Aituk7
Striker
Well if that was the case racism, homophobia and the church would still be all the rage.I think public opinion decides.
How on earth do we we expect to change someones mind with a new idea if public opinion decides
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well if that was the case racism, homophobia and the church would still be all the rage.I think public opinion decides.
so why did you turn the telly over, did you just not like it?I’ve been told I’m homophobic because I turned the telly over when 2 blokes were kissing and racist because I don’t like rap music.
but it's not, because public opinion has deemed it unacceptable. So your own argument defeats itselfWell if that was the case racism, homophobia and the church would still be all the rage.
Only because some people first turned around and argued the case against itbut it's not, because public opinion has deemed it unacceptable. So your own argument defeats itself
Indeed, but those arguments were not hate-speech, they were genuine debate which won through. I'm not sure what your point is. No one is stopping progressive debate, just the prejudiced crap.Only because some people first turned around and argued the case against it
Cause I didn’t want to watch it. Doesn’t mean I have a problem with it, lots of things I don’t have a problem with that i wouldn’t choose to watch.so why did you turn the telly over, did you just not like it?
Was the only reason because of the two blokes kissing?Cause I didn’t want to watch it. Doesn’t mean I have a problem with it, lots of things I don’t have a problem with that i wouldn’t choose to watch.
Yes they wereIndeed, but those arguments were not hate-speech,
Yes, is that a problem with you. And who exactly have I offended by turning it over?Was the only reason because of the two blokes kissing?
That video is an example of progressive debate, where is the hate being professed by trying to reduce prejudice against homosexuals?Yes they were
Do you have no knowledge of history at all?
Heretics mean anything to you?
Listen for the historical examples he mentionsThat video is an example of progressive debate, where is the hate being professed by trying to reduce prejudice against homosexuals?
Not a problem for me, but it does meet the definition of homophobic - *having or showing a dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people."Yes, is that a problem with you. And who exactly have I offended by turning it over?
I did - can you quote the lines that were prejudiced or hateful?Listen for the historical examples he mentions
But I don’t have a prejudice or dislike for homosexual people.Not a problem for me, but it does meet the definition of homophobic - *having or showing a dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people."
'Like' is pretty binary, and it would seem that you don't like men doing that. Which is fine, but be ok with the definitions.
I did - can you quote the lines that were prejudiced or hateful?
You've just said you turned the tv over because you didn't like homosexual men kissing. Is that a dislike or a like?But I don’t have a prejudice or dislike for homosexual people.
I don’t have a problem with what they are or what they do. I would just prefer not to watch, if that makes me homophobic then so be it. If there was someone having a shit on the telly I would probably turn it over, I don’t have a problem with shitting, in fact I do it myself, I would just prefer not to watch.You've just said you turned the tv over because you didn't like homosexual men kissing. Is that a dislike or a like?
in theory, decency evolves as society become more enlightened - an 80s playground 'eenie meenie miney mo' evolved to catching fishies in recent years. a 21st century caveat seems to be online\offline decency, with online lagging way behind real life for many keyboard warriors. i don't think we're quite evolved on the gammon\snowflake debate yet.Calling someone a gammon come under common decency? What about a snowflake? People have been offended by both before.
Oh ffs.Not a problem for me, but it does meet the definition of homophobic - *having or showing a dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people."
'Like' is pretty binary, and it would seem that you don't like men doing that. Which is fine, but be ok with the definitions.
I did - can you quote the lines that were prejudiced or hateful?
extreme example, being labelled a prick for holocaust jokes is probably more appropriate.Trying to lock people up for telling jokes man
I have watched it - he's not proclaiming prejudice and hate-speech at all. He's advocating causing offence in the name of progress is acceptable, which I agree with. He explicitly states that case of the 'gay times'. At no point does he say here is an example of anti-Semitism and it was good or similar.Oh ffs.
Listen mate if you're not gonna watch the clip there's no point.
Have a good weekend and enjoy censoring people
Sad boy, Sealionsurprised the usual suspect hasn’t been along yet to tell us we are all sad and constantly whinge despite our white privilege.