• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

4th test Manchester


Call me old fashioned but I think making best use of the conditions should always be the first approach in a test match. If the weather turns from day 2 onwards then there's a few of their batsmen who struggle in those conditions.
I don't think it was a dead obvious call. They probably thought days two and possibly 3 would be the best time to bat and their looked like some overhead conditions around this morning. Cummins would also have bowled but didn't seen too bothered either way.
 
Whilst the scoreline doesn't surprise me with our one dimensional bowling attack ie, too many medium quicks who need a bit in the wicket have we been unlucky or just not good enough

I haven't seen a ball yet
 
Us going at 4+ an over and scoring 300-400 today when it's sunny. Then bowling at them when they'd be going on/off due to rain and it being overcast. Plus keeping our bowlers fresh in the process.

Is definitely a better way of winning than them posting 300+ and chasing the game.

They don't have to win at the end of day, even if they desperately want to win the series.
Of course it is it sure why people can’t see this tbh like
 
The wood chance look like a massive moment? These 2 are a nightmare to get out when in, could be all over by tonight
Like I said before just makes the decision to bowl even worse.

As you shouldn't be getting people out hooking in the session before lunch if you've put someone into bat. Ball shouldn't be anywhere but full/good length outside off or attacking the stumps.
 
Us going at 4+ an over and scoring 300-400 today when it's sunny. Then bowling at them when they'd be going on/off due to rain and it being overcast. Plus keeping our bowlers fresh in the process.

Is definitely a better way of winning than them posting 300+ and chasing the game.

They don't have to win at the end of day, even if they desperately want to win the series.
Why do you have to assume that whoever bats first scores 300? If they score 300 batting second, we equally won’t win the game. I think we plan to bowl them out cheaply - just because it doesn’t work out like that doesn’t mean the decision is wrong
 
Back
Top