MSC
Striker
Agreed.Surely Eckhart gets the sack now. No self respecting Southampton fan could accept him back next season knowing that this decision is the major reason they won't be in the PL next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed.Surely Eckhart gets the sack now. No self respecting Southampton fan could accept him back next season knowing that this decision is the major reason they won't be in the PL next year.
The argument (I assume) would be "we lost because of the info Southampton gathered" or at least contributed to that game against Boro. Unfair advantage innit.Punishing Southampton is absolutely the right call, its what they deserve. However, I do not understand how you reward Boro for doing f all. Surely you just promote Hull?
Well every other team in the league should appeal thenBoro are saying that like every Club they have a right to expect that their opponents keep to the rules of the competition that everyone else in the League has agreed to. If you can't play to the rules you can't be in the competition.
So how is that going to work? Will they just cancel them all and refund them ?If I read correctly, Southampton sold out and got 2 thousand extra tickets
Different Neutral independent body listening to appeal tomorrowIt was an independent body so I can’t see them overturning it.
So you should get away with cheating if your opponent is shit?they admitted to spying on oxford of all teams and still lost. boro lost because they weren't good enough
Because Boro were the ones cheated, not Hull. Its not rocket science.
Rules were changed after that incidentSouthampton will argue leeds only took a fine. Makes me wonder if they have found proof they have been spying on other teams throughout the season.
Amazed the EFL had the balls
Which will lead to a sacking. Can’t keep his job open for a year.According to Sky Sports news Eckert could be facing a ban of at least a year
Playoffs are a different part, I’m guessing the four points is punishment for the spying in season. I’m not sure you can go any further back or you’d risk voiding the season. The fact they were caught spying prior to the play offs game I guess the efl were hoping boro beat them so less hassle. It’s the only punishment that makes sense really, the playoffs are treat like a different part of the season and unless they’d wanted complete carnage over the entire season this seems the punishment that makes sense. Kicked out of the playoffs and start next season on -4.The spying happened before the first game. If the punishment is retroactive and Southampton are expelled then why shouldnt Wrexham get a chance at Boro? Not saying I think they should, just that the whole thing is messy. Most fair result is to promote Hull.
Ignominious for Southampton. They now join a rogue group of cheating clubs:
1. Leeds City, 1919 (financial irregularities, blackmail - they then folded)
2. Arsenal, 1919 (authorised corruption - payments for promotion)
3. Leeds United, 1961-74 (the Don Revie years of on field cheating and thuggery and off field financial misconduct and bribery)
4. Leeds United, 2009 (spying on Derby County)
This is an absolute disgraceAt least they made a quick decision, only 3 years and counting for the Man City 115
It will have been a horse trade today.I don't understand how the appeal will be just 1 day, given that it's to a completely different panel ... surely they'll need as long as the original to hear the evidence and judge it in order to decide if the punishment is proportionate?
Ha'way Hull
At least they made a quick decision, only 3 years and counting for the Man City 115