dangermows
Striker
He has seen it's hit his arm ffsHow can a pro ref not see that the ball has hit his arm there man.![]()
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He has seen it's hit his arm ffsHow can a pro ref not see that the ball has hit his arm there man.![]()
It's not the rules, it's the way they enforce them. There will always be debatable hand ball decisions but that was handball.IFAB have made the rules so complicated, the professionals who are there to implement the rules don’t know what they’re doing.
The rules need simplifying and they need to get some competent referees.
Accidental tbf. It's come off another body part first and his arm is in a natural position.
He's there lad! Reet in amongst it, love it!He has seen it's hit his arm ffs. The judgement call is intent (its hit another body part first) and unnatural positioning of his arm, or not.
It’s little wonder people use the word “corruption”.How can you even have the audacity to call that a misjudgement !!!!!!!!
It’s just a complete fuck up.
I mean it was clear like, he got an advantage which they later scored from. It’s a good job forest are safe imagine they were still in the mix and that point was huge.One of the worst decisions I've seen.
Not good enoughFor not ruling out Cunha’s goal after Mbuemo’s hand ball.
It’s just ridiculous isn’t it? How can the ref miss it in real time, have his mate say “you might want to look at this”, watch a replay, and still get it wrong?
If the people refereeing the game don’t know the rules, what are they doing there in the first place?
How can a pro ref not see that the ball has hit his arm there man.![]()
Surprised they've apologised as surely it's just down to a subjective opinion of if his arm is in an unnatural position or not. Obviously hits the arm, doesn't seem deliberate as the ball is deflected to him and then is coming off his stomach area.
But the rules seem a mess as if he'd scored himself in that moment instead of his shot being blocked it would have been ruled out no question. But because he didn't it's subjective opinion handball again. Which is a bit silly anyway that because he didn't score it's not a clear cut absolute decision despite the handball being the same.
No way anyone but one of the big boys would get that decision. Not a chance in hell.All this the many other blatant mistakes do is just back up claims of corruption (especially when it's always the big clubs who benefit)
There is no forgiving the refereeing for that 'goal' mind as the rules around handball in the box leading to a goal have been very clear all season
This wasn’t a VAR shocker though, weirdly enough. They sent the ref to the screen and he stuck with his decision. Only so much VAR could doI find it funny that all of the proper VAR shockers always seem to benefit the sky 6
He has seen it's hit his arm ffs. The judgement call is intent (its hit another body part first) and unnatural positioning of his arm, or not.
Fair play, but the overall point still stands. I'd say the vast majority of the very worst decisions always tend to go the way of those 6 clubs (maybe not so much Spurs this season).This wasn’t a VAR shocker though, weirdly enough. They sent the ref to the screen and he stuck with his decision. Only so much VAR could do