Well, it obviously doesnt, or they wouldn't have the rules!
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
Southampton spying compendium thread
- Thread starter jarrowdiamond
- Start date
Diamond Eyes
Full Back
Apparently there’s an appeal date of the 27th already set for Southampton. Interesting in itself.
This is exactly what it comes down to. They broke the rules. Kick them out.
Last edited:
The poster might have mentioned recording but the regulation itself does not.
Without prejudice to the requirements of Regulation 3.4 (that each Club shall behave towards each
other Club with the utmost good faith), no Club shall directly or indirectly observe (or attempt to
observe) another Club’s training session in the period of 72 hours prior to any match scheduled to be
played between those respective Clubs.
woodlebert
Striker
Doesn’t matter but agree there’s no public evidence of that
Cee Jay
Striker
link...unless it's some youtuber or bedroom dwelling "wanabee journo"
One tree is nowt.
Other than him pointing his camera/phone at them, then seen to delete content off his phone, before running away!
woodlebert
Striker
I agree with the poster that technically there’s no evidence of it, although it’s clearly what he’s doing
As you've pointed out, it's irrelevant anyway.
sponge
Winger
There is evidence. Even if every single thing he recorded is wiped and never to be recovered there’s actual footage of him being stood in a place observing something he isn’t allowed to be doing as an employee of Southampton.
woodlebert
Striker
Correct
I’m saying there isn’t evidence (in the public domain) of him recording
contrarian
Central Defender
With the money available in premier league à 200k fine just doesnt cut it
À 2m or 10m fine would still be chump change
Has to be either a significant points reduction or award game to boro
If other teams can prove similar spying allegations it should be game over
I reckon Soton may throw that coach under the bus ( as it were)
À 2m or 10m fine would still be chump change
Has to be either a significant points reduction or award game to boro
If other teams can prove similar spying allegations it should be game over
I reckon Soton may throw that coach under the bus ( as it were)
Smiler
Striker
Needs more tall shrubbery
buster
Striker
I’ve got a cunning plan , let Southampton play Hull in the final and give every decision against them as is seen every weekend by incompetent refereeing , nobody would notice any difference anyway.
Makes sure Hull win , all the fans go to Wembley on time and jobs a good un.
Then the EFL can sanction Southampton for next season
Makes sure Hull win , all the fans go to Wembley on time and jobs a good un.
Then the EFL can sanction Southampton for next season
The play off competition doesn't award points, so a points deduction has no merit. Within the play off competition the only known rule breaking was allegedly carried out by Southampton against Boro in the immediate build up to the first leg. A logical and proportionate punishment would be awarding Boro the tie with a 3-0 win.
The football league season itself is a separate competition, as yet there is no publicly available information that Southampton have broken this rule in that competition. If it's proven satisfactorily that they have then a points deduction and or fine and or expulsion from the competition is within the scope of penalties, needs to be proportionate though.
JC70
Full Back
Yes, maybe Boro played poorly because Saints were able to nullify them because of the insight into their tactics, set up, line up, set pieces gained from spying. It's an unquantifiable and a moot point.
