• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Southampton spying compendium thread


Blyth said:
Logon or register to see this image


I think they’ll have to made an example of.

It’s like those sentences during the riots.

Leanne’s bouncy castles getting 2 years for moving a wheelie bin.

When they started dishing out those punishments it all stopped.

If not it’s gonna set a precedent and it’s a free for all for 200m jackpot.
Click to expand...
Tranmere
 
MadMackem10 said:
I can’t get my head round this argument that Boro didn’t play very well so the punishment shouldn’t be harsh.

It will be impossible to quantify the true impact this has had on Boro and their players. Also you really expecting Southampton to be caught spying and then choose to turn up and batter Boro? Everyone knows how that would look.

Boro’s entire game prep will have been disadvantaged less than 72 hours before the game. Does the manager rip up his plan and start again? Does he need to create new set piece routines? How does he manage get round the fact that his opponents knew one of their best players was still out injured.
Click to expand...
However I made a valid argument for a less harsh punishment because Boro don’t have trees at their training ground. What self respecting club is treeless in this day and age?
 
North Yorks Mackem said:
Yet when man city in 2014 and chelsea cheated more recently they just got a fine. You cant have severe penalties for one form of cheating and minor penalties for another kind of cheating (which will have had a far greater impact on results).
Click to expand...
Man City and Chelsea were charged by the Premier League were they not? two different bodies with different rules and punishments it’s like comparing a sentence from America to those in the UK.

Also they were charged with very different breaches so again you can’t compare them. It’s a stand alone charge that no club have been charged with since the new updated rules have been formed. This is the case that any future spy issues that RFL find themselves in will go back to so a fine will open the flood gates.

Sky are saying a decision by Tuesday and possible chance of the match being delayed which means Wembley may not be available. If it ends up Hull and Boro then surely a northern stadium has to be used, yes they’ll get 15k less tickets but both average attendances would just about fit in our Stadium and it means they’d not need hotels just travel. EFL would probably have it at Cardiff though just to sell as many tickets as possible.
 
buster said:
95 pages about something that doesn’t involve us as a club , is that a record on here ?
Click to expand...
Its is yes but if you care to read it you read the same bastard points 100 times 😂:

Spying would be no help anyway.
Can points deductions be carried to the prem.
Clubs dont really practice owt.
Are there fences/signs up there?
Its a hotel on public land (wtf 😂).
 
Korra said:
I think it’s mad that after 94 pages there are some posters that still don’t understand that there’s an EFL regulation which prohibits observing, or attempting to observe another clubs training session 72 hours prior to kickoff

Southampton had a lad there recording the training session. We know he works for Southampton because he’s pictured among Tonda Eckert’s staff. The info they might or might not have gotten from it is completely irrelevant to the argument

Fuck me. What part of this is difficult to understand?
Click to expand...
He was there. No evidence of it being recorded yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top