• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Mellborg - perennial back-up or future 1st teamer?


If the club didn’t think Patto would make it I can’t see how they think this kid will

Patto isn’t brilliant but he’s a better shot stopper than Mellborg
When Patterson was the same age as Ellborg, he'd just had a loan finished in the conference and came back to Sunderland.
 
When Patterson was the same age as Ellborg, he'd just had a loan finished in the conference and came back to Sunderland.

Fair enough but if we’re talking about next season and playing regular Patto would give me more confidence than Ellborg does right now
 
Fair enough but if we’re talking about next season and playing regular Patto would give me more confidence than Ellborg does right now
Aye but thats a completely different question to asking if a 22 year old keeper is 'perennial backup'.

Why can't people just give young players time? He won't have been bought to start even next season.
 
Comparing any young keeper to Pickford is a tough one man. He's been Englands number 1 for 10 yrs and isn't he one of England's highest ever appearance holders? The hero of multiple tournaments :lol:

He was unbelievable at a young age but it's possible to be a very solid Premier League goalkeeper without being compared to JP.

It's too early to say, clearly. Let's give the lad a chance. I suspect he'll end up understudy to Young when we inevitably sell Roefs.
 
Aye but thats a completely different question to asking if a 22 year old keeper is 'perennial backup'.

Why can't people just give young players time? He won't have been bought to start even next season.

I get he’s been put in well before we expected him to be and he’s got plenty of time to develop, he may well make it but…

His handling is poor
Distribution is hit and miss
Can’t get through bodies to claim or punch a ball

I just think there’s too much wrong for him to be a premier league goal keeper

Also we’ve got Young out on loan who is probably a better prospect so Ellborg is likely to be his back up or hopefully will be
 
Last edited:
Comparing any young keeper to Pickford is a tough one man. He's been Englands number 1 for 10 yrs and isn't he one of England's highest ever appearance holders? The hero of multiple tournaments :lol:

He was unbelievable at a young age but it's possible to be a very solid Premier League goalkeeper without being compared to JP.

It's too early to say, clearly. Let's give the lad a chance. I suspect he'll end up understudy to Young when we inevitably sell Roefs.
Even Pickford was 22/23 ish before becoming our number 1.
I get he’s been put in well before we expected him to be and he’s got plenty of time to develop, he may well make it but…

His handling is poor
Distribution is hit and miss
Can’t get through bodies to claim or punch a ball

I just think there’s too much wrong for him to be a premier league goal keeper
Its just mental to write players off so easily.

Emi Martinez at villa was playing at Sheffield Wednesday at the bottom end of the championship.

He didn't become a PL regular keeper until 26. Hes now a world cup winner and seen as one of the best is the league. There will be dozens of examples like this.

Ellborg isn't ready, but writing him off is absolutely pathetic and sums this place up. People had written off rigg the other week at 18.
 
Last edited:
Even Pickford was 22/23 ish before becoming our number 1.

Its just mental to write players off so easily.

Emi Martinez at villa was playing at Sheffield Wednesday at the bottom end of the championship.

He didn't become a PL regular keeper until 26. Hes now a world cup winner and seen as one of the best is the league. There will be dozens of examples like this.

Ellborg isn't ready, but writing him off is absolutely pathetic and sums this place up. People had written off rigg the other week at 18.

You’re allowed to look at the attributes of a young player and decide they’re not going to make it we don’t have to believe that every player is going to make it

I’m a believer in giving people time to develop and am not one of those that thinks Rigg won’t make it I just don’t think Ellborg is going to

People like Martinez showed better promise than Ellborg is
 
Whatever happens the decisions will be made with Matty Young in mind. 2 years time and he'll be out number 1, no doubt about it.

Personally I think the club will do everything possible to hold onto Roefs for one more year, then let him go with Matty waiting to step in.
You’re allowed to look at the attributes of a young player and decide they’re not going to make it we don’t have to believe that every player is going to make it

I’m a believer in giving people time to develop and am not one of those that thinks Rigg won’t make it I just don’t think Ellborg is going to

People like Martinez showed better promise than Ellborg is
Martinez, you're using one of the best keepers in the world as a benchmark, Very unfair.
 
You’re allowed to look at the attributes of a young player and decide they’re not going to make it we don’t have to believe that every player is going to make it

I’m a believer in giving people time to develop and am not one of those that thinks Rigg won’t make it I just don’t think Ellborg is going to

People like Martinez showed better promise than Ellborg is
Fair enough. Pointless going round and round in circles.

Ellborg was brought in for peanuts and will either contribute long term or they'll probably get a profit on him anyway.

Not sure why we need a thread to decide right now about him.
Martinez, you're using one of the best keepers in the world as a benchmark, Very unfair.
Like I've just said above, Martinez didn't become a PL regular until 26 but people want to write off Ellborg after about 400 minutes.
 
Last edited:
Whatever happens the decisions will be made with Matty Young in mind. 2 years time and he'll be out number 1, no doubt about it.

Personally I think the club will do everything possible to hold onto Roefs for one more year, then let him go with Matty waiting to step in.

Martinez, you're using one of the best keepers in the world as a benchmark, Very unfair.

Wasn’t my example mate I was just replying to someone else’s example
Fair enough. Pointless going round and round in circles.

Ellborg was brought in for peanuts and will either contribute long term or they'll probably get a profit on him anyway.

Not sure why we need a thread to decide right now about him.

We probably will make a profit given how little we paid

He’s probably judged quite harshly because of how good Roeffs has been as well and given the fact our model is buy young and sell high the questions are always going to be asked of any young player
 
Don’t think he’s ready to start in the PL but the problem with goalkeepers, unlike the other 10 outfield players is that you don’t sub them or rotate them. If he doesn’t start he never really learns.
 
Lads been here 2 minutes and been thrust into the first team, he's done fine when called upon and looks a good prospect...but let's just write him straight off ffs.
Yes but in those 2 minutes some of the resident experts on here have fully evaluated the lad and concluded that he's never going to be good enough.

As others have commented I doubt he was brought in as no 1 should Roefs leave.
 
When Patterson was the same age as Ellborg, he'd just had a loan finished in the conference and came back to Sunderland.

That's not really true at all though is it?

Ellborg is 22 years and 11 months old.

When Patterson was 22 years and 11 months old, he'd been back from his loan at Notts County for over a year, and he was approaching the end of his first season as number 1 keeper for us in the Championship, during which he played every game, having broken through the year before in League One. He'd played the best part of 75 games as our number 1 keeper for us. He was very well established at that point.
 
That's not really true at all though is it?

Ellborg is 22 years and 11 months old.

When Patterson was 22 years and 11 months old, he'd been back from his loan at Notts County for over a year, and he was approaching the end of his first season as number 1 keeper for us in the Championship, during which he played every game, having broken through the year before in League One. He'd played the best part of 75 games as our number 1 keeper for us. He was very well established at that point.
Haway man, I'm not going to delve right into the months :lol: just went for rough ages. Its also hard to judge that version of Patterson to Ellborg.

Patterson will be on a higher wage than Ellborg and if sold, will cost more than we paid for Ellborg. He needs time and has done okay after being thrust in. Loads of time
Yep. The lads done fine. There’s no doubt Roefs is better with his feet currently, people conveniently forget Roefs has made some errors on the ball too, Bournemouth away being one obvious one.

He’s come in away to Leeds and the mags and done well.
People are going on like this is him and the finished product of what he can be. Can't get my head around it at all.

Same people who probably give Talbi grief
 
Last edited:
Back
Top