• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Durham v Kent (h) C.C. ( 3/4/26)

Theirs a difference between saying the standard is awful which it is than people suggesting it's an agenda against Durham
I don't particularly think it's an anti Durham agenda, I just think it's all round poor in general. Obviously at times I don't have the benefit of a YouTube video replay at the game so rely on social media at times but stuff like that bad light call this afternoon really annoys me.
 

You know my view. I've said for years the standard is just shit across the board. That bad light decision this afternoon up there with one of the worst decisions I've seen. I just think the standard is very poor all round.
The umpiring is very variable. It's the finger up instantly that annoys me - unless it's absolutely plumb it should require some thoughtCertainly Durham had 3 shouts which looked much closer than McKinney 's dismissal. That's not an agenda against Durham it's just an honest opinion which posters should not be suppressed to express.
 
Last edited:
The umpiring is very variable. It's the finger up instantly that annoys me - unless it's absolutely plumb it should require some thoughtCertainly Durham had 3 shouts which looked much closer than McKinney 's dismissal. That's not an agenda against Durham it's just an honest opinion which posters should not be suppressed to express.
Not you but other people as soon as Durham get bad decision against them it's an agenda always against Durham, very quiet when we get fortunate decisions as well
 
The umpiring is very variable. It's the finger up instantly that annoys me - unless it's absolutely plumb it should require some thoughtCertainly Durham had 3 shouts which looked much closer than McKinney 's dismissal. That's not an agenda against Durham it's just an honest opinion which posters should not be suppressed to express.

As I've said for years, majority of the time with LBW, they're just guessing. It's just a very very poor standard
 
Not you but other people as soon as Durham get bad decision against them it's an agenda always against Durham, very quiet when we get fortunate decisions as well
Yeh,some supporters are prone to be a shade bias. I don't feel I have the right to condemn them for it. That's life.None of us are perfect.
 
Not you but other people as soon as Durham get bad decision against them it's an agenda always against Durham, very quiet when we get fortunate decisions as well

I'll say what I like on here if I dont agree with an umpires decision.

Just because you dont agree, it's not going to change my mind.

Message board forums are all about different opinions. You constantly whinge at posters who form an opinion that doesn't agree with yours. Well nothing is going to change those opinions so just accept it.
 
As I've said for years, majority of the time with LBW, they're just guessing. It's just a very very poor standard
There are 3 salary grades for umpires in 1st class cricket £100k,£60k,40k per annum plus separate fees for the Hundred. On those salaries consistent high performance should be expected. The lower tier are normally confined to Division 2 which is why we didn't recognise today's 2. Be prepared,therefore,for a lower standard this season.
I'll say what I like on here if I dont agree with an umpires decision.

Just because you dont agree, it's not going to change my mind.

Message board forums are all about different opinions. You constantly whinge at posters who form an opinion that doesn't agree with yours. Well nothing is going to change those opinions so just accept it.
Totally agree. He,and another regular poster, appear to claim the right to condemn very readily views apposite to theirs.
 
Last edited:
There are 3 salary grades for umpires in 1st class cricket £100k,£60k,40k per annum plus separate fees for the Hundred. On those salaries consistent high performance should be expected. The lower tier are normally confined to Division 2 which is why we didn't recognise today's 2. Be prepared,therefore,for a lower standard this season.
I actually didn't know that but I don't expect much full stop from the umpires in the CC, they're very very poor.
 
I'll say what I like on here if I dont agree with an umpires decision.

Just because you dont agree, it's not going to change my mind.

Message board forums are all about different opinions. You constantly whinge at posters who form an opinion that doesn't agree with yours. Well nothing is going to change those opinions so just accept it.
Nope the standard is awful of umpiring it's not an agenda against Durham why would random people have agenda against us
 
Nope the standard is awful of umpiring it's not an agenda against Durham why would random people have agenda against us
I don't know if they have but I've certainly have that perception at times. It's the furthest North,hence generally the coldest,and generally the longest and most incovenient to travel to. Hence we're probably not very popular. I certainly wouldn't dismiss that view out of hand.Nor condemn people for expressing it.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if they have but I've certainly have that perception at times. It's the furthest North,hence generally the coldest,and generally the longest and most incovenient to travel to. Hence we're probably not very popular. I certainly wouldn't dismiss that view out of hand.Nor condemn people for expressing it.
Jesus if people are going to be that cynical and paranoid I don't get how they can enjoy cricket so you not get how silly that sounds
 
Jesus if people are going to be that cynical and paranoid I don't get how they can enjoy cricket so you not get how silly that sounds
As I've repeated ad nauseum we operate on entirely different wavelengths. Whenever I attempt to engage in discussion or respond to your requests you regress to inflammatory and insulting rhetoric.
 
As I've repeated ad nauseum we operate on entirely different wavelengths. Whenever I attempt to engage in discussion or respond to your requests you regress to inflammatory and insulting rhetoric.
You have just suggested we might not be liked because it's slightly further to travel and slightly colder that's ridiculous
 
Just my opinion here, on an umpires lbw decision. We were there all day with no benefit of a action replay. The lbw decisions looked to me to be correct. It looked like the decisions against Durham were given when the batter was playing back into his crease and the 2 Kent decisions likewise. Northeast was putting in a big stride forward so when he was struck in front he got the benefit of any doubt as it should be. In my opinion of course.
I can't quite fathom out why their over rate is only -2
I think the -2 is worked out by they should bowl 16 overs an hour. Throughout the day they bowled at 14 giving a -2 figure. That is why the figure is updated hourly on the scoreboard. It is then carried over to the second innings giving them a chance to pull it back.
 
Last edited:
Just my opinion here, on an umpires lbw decision. We were there all day with no benefit of a action replay. The lbw decisions looked to me to be correct. It looked like the decisions against Durham were given when the batter was playing back into his crease and the 2 Kent decisions likewise. Northeast was putting in a big stride forward so when he was struck in front he got the benefit of any doubt as it should be. In my opinion of course.

I think the -2 is worked out by they should bowl 16 overs an hour. Throughout the day they bowled at 14 giving a -2 figure. That is why the figure is updated hourly on the scoreboard. It is then carried over to the second innings giving them a chance to pull it back.
I agree with this for the umpiring decisions yesterday. Some on here are like the football lot when it comes to referees and supposed biases.

The Durham ones given out were tight but you can absolutely understand why they were given out on first viewing. The ones not given when bowling seemed right as well - the Potts one everyone seems to think the batter hit it, Raine’s first one clearly going down leg side and the second close but probably just outside the line.

There’s no conspiracy against Durham, sometimes you get close decisions given for you and sometimes against. Just the way it goes.
 
Back
Top