Nobody’s got a ‘beef’.
I know you don’t exactly ‘get’ this but people are taking the piss (not I hasten to add, ‘outraged’) because your thread title suggested that one of the fairly regular and routine amendments to the design of bank notes had ‘erased history’.
You surely can’t expect people not to mock that?
I mean even the people who think that Churchill was the greatest British person who ever existed are ripping the piss out of your apparent outrage.
Don’t you think taking a step back and maybe typing something like “aye, alright, maybe I was a bit over the top. What I meant to say was I don’t think they should remove important figures from the design of bank notes” might have been a better approach. Instead you’ve doubled down and started telling everybody else they’re being unreasonable.
It’s not working if you wanted them to start taking you seriously.
I’m (sort of) trying to be helpful here but I’m not anticipating a magnanimous response. I’m happy to be surprised.