Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reform will shut all bridges. They are so wokeThis. The current council have done an outstanding job reshaping the City. Not voting for them because you don’t like the current government would let Reform in and would be catastrophic for the City.
Would hardly be engineering of the scale that raised the Costa Concordia. The bridge seems quite deep and if designed in from start, could easily have been recessed when big crowds. Going by what was said after the rugby and the fact stewards were positioned to stop people walking into them suggests for big events could be a pain. Think easy to walk over a bridge and around a seat but apparently not. Someone said it as a joke but I actually think it isn't a bad idea at all but everybody just piles on and takes the piss. It's academic anyway.no, someone wrote it on here as a joke and then all of a sudden it was true![]()
Don't forget Sunderland council also want to prevent the Stadium extension, and have refused to address the post-match Kier Hardy parking which they themselves have declared dangerous to life.Ok, so what I'm saying is if you would vote labour for what they have done for Sunderland city centre so far, would you vote to keep Starmers lot in if there was a general election. I'd say no.
I've been over the bridge and if you walk into the seats then it's your own fault for walking into the seats.Would hardly be engineering of the scale that raised the Costa Concordia. The bridge seems quite deep and if designed in from start, could easily have been recessed when big crowds. Going by what was said after the rugby and the fact stewards were positioned to stop people walking into them suggests for big events could be a pain. Think easy to walk over a bridge and around a seat but apparently not. Someone said it as a joke but I actually think it isn't a bad idea at all but everybody just piles on and takes the piss. It's academic anyway.
You seem unhappy enough without making things up to make yourself more unhappy about things. Look for the positives. There's loads if you open your eyes and look around the place.Don't forget Sunderland council also want to prevent the Stadium extension, and have refused to address the post-match Kier Hardy parking which they themselves have declared dangerous to life.
(Some on here seem very happy with it, but most the new buildings are like something from Gateshead town centre)
I've not seen the seats or where they're positioned but are they not HVM's (hostile vehicle measures) to stop vehicles being driven into the crowds.Would hardly be engineering of the scale that raised the Costa Concordia. The bridge seems quite deep and if designed in from start, could easily have been recessed when big crowds. Going by what was said after the rugby and the fact stewards were positioned to stop people walking into them suggests for big events could be a pain. Think easy to walk over a bridge and around a seat but apparently not. Someone said it as a joke but I actually think it isn't a bad idea at all but everybody just piles on and takes the piss. It's academic anyway.
A few lies in here mindDon't forget Sunderland council also want to prevent the Stadium extension, and have refused to address the post-match Kier Hardy parking which they themselves have declared dangerous to life.
(Some on here seem very happy with it, but most the new buildings are like something from Gateshead town centre)
I've just walked back from the Stadium via the 'traditional' route and there are benches, bins, planters, bollards, big kerbs and all sorts and people seem to have managed to not gan arse owa tit.I've been over the bridge and if you walk into the seats then it's your own fault for walking into the seats.
Would hardly be engineering of the scale that raised the Costa Concordia. The bridge seems quite deep and if designed in from start, could easily have been recessed when big crowds. Going by what was said after the rugby and the fact stewards were positioned to stop people walking into them suggests for big events could be a pain. Think easy to walk over a bridge and around a seat but apparently not. Someone said it as a joke but I actually think it isn't a bad idea at all but everybody just piles on and takes the piss. It's academic anyway.
People would moan if there wasn't seats on it imo. City landmark with them views available and no seats FFS???
No but they like to create a straw man. ‘Bairns and pensioners will fall over them’Do people normally walk into stuff that is right in front of them?
Nee shopsNothing to whinge and moan about now.![]()
They don’tDon't forget Sunderland council also want to prevent the Stadium extension
Don't forget Sunderland council also want to prevent the Stadium extension, and have refused to address the post-match Kier Hardy parking which they themselves have declared dangerous to life.
(Some on here seem very happy with it, but most the new buildings are like something from Gateshead town centre)
Chinese touristsYou must be logged on to see media items
Even in the strange circumstance someone did (similar to say a lamppost if you’re caught in the middle of talking to someone), at most you’re likely to take a slight clip to the knee or shin and say ayah, while your mates laugh and then you carry on. The way some have gone on about benches it’s as if you’d hit them and do a flip over the railings and into the river.Do people normally walk into stuff that is right in front of them?
I still can’t, and don’t think I’ll ever understand why people don’t get the distinction between local politics/councils and government.
Its baffling.