• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Leeds agree £10m for Longstaff


dcl0sc said:
He reckons all he does is sit back, break up play and then play simple billy basic passes as that's all he has and if that's what Leeds are after, he's their man.
Click to expand...
Don't most decent midfields have the more basic player. He played it well when Bruno, Joe and Longstaff pretty much got us into the CL.
 
Behind Enemy Lines said:
One of those players who can do a job surrounded by good players but don’t think he’s suited to being the main man in a lesser team. Man Utd had loads of those types during the Fergie years, half of them ended up playing for us.
Click to expand...

And most did a decent job for us in the top tier for a decent period of time. Leeds would take that.
 
Sea to Shining Sea said:
I don’t think I’ve read anyone on here describe him as mint. And a component premier league player is a good signing for a newly promoted side.
Click to expand...
My point being more than a fair few regard experience as a necessity for the Premier League which I personally think is a load of bollocks
 
At 10m I think he’s a decent enough signing for any newly promoted team, brings some experience and not at a huge cost really.

Will be interesting to see how he does surrounded by poorer players
 
DPTT said:
My point being more than a fair few regard experience as a necessity for the Premier League which I personally think is a load of bollocks
Click to expand...
Experience of performing at the level and demonstrating a capacity to cope there is pretty important. Not many sides do well there without it.
 
Whichever way you look at it, £10m for 27 year old with most of his games played in the top flight can’t be a bad deal.
 
Tom said:
I would, which clubs out of the 20 most seasons have the least premier league experience in their squads?
Click to expand...
The three that come up, but I’d say the three that come up have the least quality. That’s where the difference is. Not experience.

Likes of Brighton (constantly mid table since promotion) & Brentford (same) didn’t litter their squad with premier league experience at all. They recruited well from overseas. That’s the model that we are seemingly following like it or not.

Brighton -
You must be logged on to see external links

Brentford -
You must be logged on to see external links


Not much premier league experience there at all (it’s their first transfer window after promotion for reference).
 
Last edited:
SAFC Wilks said:
The three that come up, but I’d say the three that come up have the least quality. That’s where the difference is. Not experience.

Likes of Brighton (constantly mid table since promotion) & Brentford (same) didn’t litter their squad with premier league experience at all. They recruited well from overseas. That’s the model that we are seemingly following like it or not.

Brighton -
You must be logged on to see external links

Brentford -
You must be logged on to see external links


Not much premier league experience there at all (it’s their first transfer window after promotion for reference).
Click to expand...
Well that’s 2 clubs who’ve bucked the trend in the last 6 years.
 
Sort of signing you’d expect a Leicester or Birmingham to make in the championship

Nothing football who main attribute is he works hard
 
StayPuft said:
Going from Diarra to Sadiki to Longstaff is quite the downgrade. There's definitely worse midfielders in this league but it's some downgrade
Click to expand...
While I hope the above is correct can we be at least aware we’re buying young lads who’ve never kicked a ball in the UK… versus a lad who’s been pretty regular for a top half premier side over a good few years.
 
DPTT said:
More than just the Premier League though, some people seem to think other leagues don’t count
Click to expand...
You’d have to be very wary of a squad completely made up of foreign players without any prem experience in there, a mixture of both would be a different story.
 
VXi said:
Don't most decent midfields have the more basic player. He played it well when Bruno, Joe and Longstaff pretty much got us into the CL.
Click to expand...
Utter bullshit.

Last season minutes wise he played the equivalent of 9 games out 38 in the Premier League.

Your expansive football knowledge putting us mere mortals to shame again 😂
Pudding said:
While I hope the above is correct can we be at least aware we’re buying young lads who’ve never kicked a ball in the UK… versus a lad who’s been pretty regular for a top half premier side over a good few years.
Click to expand...
I agree apart from the regular bit. He played a lot when Tonali was banned. He played when the mags had injuries. He's never been a first choice.

We've bought young, current internationals with potentially very high ceilings, time will tell of course. Leeds have bought a plodder. Plodders won't keep you up. If they buy several better he might fill in and they might have a chance.

I'd rather aim higher.
 
Last edited:
Keith S30S said:
Utter bullshit.

Last season minutes wise he played the equivalent of 9 games out 38 in the Premier League.

Your expansive football knowledge putting us mere mortals to shame again 😂
Click to expand...
Aye, Longstaff or Tonali?
2 years ago, Bruno, Joe and Longstaff got us in the CL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top