• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Elland road upgrade


If I was the owners I'd make sure I've done my market research on the potential customer base before I start shelling out on this project.

There's a reason why Leeds - despite being one of England's leading club in the last 60's / early 70's and then league champions in 92 - don't already have a stadium bigger than 36k.

They've never had an season average crowd of 40k and when times get hard their crowds drop by 50% at least. I'm sure someone will point out West Ham did it and Everton are doing it but those were both new builds.

They'd better off doing the West Stand first and seeing if this waiting list is as committed as they think it is. A couple of seasons getting tw@tted in the PL will test their current assumptions I suspect.



Leeds have a bigger fan base than us. I'm not even sure how people can argue this :lol:

Have you been drinking? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
If I was the owners I'd make sure I've done my market research on the potential customer base before I start shelling out on this project.

There's a reason why Leeds - despite being one of England's leading club in the last 60's / early 70's and then league champions in 92 - don't already have a stadium bigger than 36k.

They've never had an season average crowd of 40k and when times get hard their crowds drop by 50% at least. I'm sure someone will point out West Ham did it and Everton are doing it but those were both new builds.

They'd better off doing the West Stand first and seeing if this waiting list is as committed as they think it is. A couple of seasons getting tw@tted in the PL will test their current assumptions I suspect.





Have you been drinking? :rolleyes:
It will come down to cost. I'm happy with a redeveloped Elland Road. South Stand retained as it is, may make it lop sided but the upside is that's where most of the noise comes from so won't be watered down by tourists. As for waiting lists, as you say the proof will be in the pudding. Club has already made a tidy sum from the fee to join the waiting list so they must be reasonably confident.
 
If I was the owners I'd make sure I've done my market research on the potential customer base before I start shelling out on this project.

There's a reason why Leeds - despite being one of England's leading club in the last 60's / early 70's and then league champions in 92 - don't already have a stadium bigger than 36k.

They've never had an season average crowd of 40k and when times get hard their crowds drop by 50% at least. I'm sure someone will point out West Ham did it and Everton are doing it but those were both new builds.

They'd better off doing the West Stand first and seeing if this waiting list is as committed as they think it is. A couple of seasons getting tw@tted in the PL will test their current assumptions I suspect.





Have you been drinking? :rolleyes:

Unfortunately not
 
If I was the owners I'd make sure I've done my market research on the potential customer base before I start shelling out on this project.

There's a reason why Leeds - despite being one of England's leading club in the last 60's / early 70's and then league champions in 92 - don't already have a stadium bigger than 36k.
Attendances over the game are far different to previous decades and been steadily increasing since the mid 80s

Logon or register to see this image



To think that Leeds couldn't fill it after being extended is being naive and it's obvious the owners will have looked into it in detail. With the current 35k crowds, they get £30m in gate receipts as they limit season tickets and don't have generous concession prices. To put that into perspective, we got £11.6m from 40k fans so there's a huge difference in what fans pay on average at both clubs. They're actually 7th highest paying fans if you just do the basic calculation of match day revenue divided by fans as I hoyed this up previously and was surprised at it.

Logon or register to see this image


These were their prices for 2018/19 after the finished 13th and had been out of the Premier League since 2003, spent 3 seasons in League One in 2007-2010 then spent 6 of the following 8 seasons finishing 13th or below in the Championship and just average over 31k in 2017/18. In many areas it's more expensive than we are now.



If we had exactly the same pricing structure as Leeds limiting ST sales and concession areas then we wouldn't be getting the 40k we get now. That's what's class about the SOL size as the owners can't take the piss with pricing due to demand exceeding supply. Though as we've seen this season they've dramatically increased concession prices in the East & West stands and dropped the U16 down to U14. This is only the start as it will change more if we hit the Premier League as they know crowds will increase.

Leeds will easily get 1,000s more attending and they've got plenty of wiggle room to create concessions that would attract parents to take kids to games like we can. This then gets them hooked at an early age and gets them to go to games even when times are crap.

All this discussion about crowds online is usually just pointless dick waving as there's far more than just looking an average number, unless it's being used in a school playground between kids.
 
If I was the owners I'd make sure I've done my market research on the potential customer base before I start shelling out on this project.

There's a reason why Leeds - despite being one of England's leading club in the last 60's / early 70's and then league champions in 92 - don't already have a stadium bigger than 36k.

They've never had an season average crowd of 40k and when times get hard their crowds drop by 50% at least. I'm sure someone will point out West Ham did it and Everton are doing it but those were both new builds.

They'd better off doing the West Stand first and seeing if this waiting list is as committed as they think it is. A couple of seasons getting tw@tted in the PL will test their current assumptions I suspect.





Have you been drinking? :rolleyes:
They didn't even average one season of 30000 when they were in League 1. Highest was 26k. Their fans deserted them.
 
Attendances over the game are far different to previous decades and been steadily increasing since the mid 80s

Logon or register to see this image



To think that Leeds couldn't fill it after being extended is being naive and it's obvious the owners will have looked into it in detail. With the current 35k crowds, they get £30m in gate receipts as they limit season tickets and don't have generous concession prices. To put that into perspective, we got £11.6m from 40k fans so there's a huge difference in what fans pay on average at both clubs. They're actually 7th highest paying fans if you just do the basic calculation of match day revenue divided by fans as I hoyed this up previously and was surprised at it.

Logon or register to see this image


These were their prices for 2018/19 after the finished 13th and had been out of the Premier League since 2003, spent 3 seasons in League One in 2007-2010 then spent 6 of the following 8 seasons finishing 13th or below in the Championship and just average over 31k in 2017/18. In many areas it's more expensive than we are now.



If we had exactly the same pricing structure as Leeds limiting ST sales and concession areas then we wouldn't be getting the 40k we get now. That's what's class about the SOL size as the owners can't take the piss with pricing due to demand exceeding supply. Though as we've seen this season they've dramatically increased concession prices in the East & West stands and dropped the U16 down to U14. This is only the start as it will change more if we hit the Premier League as they know crowds will increase.

Leeds will easily get 1,000s more attending and they've got plenty of wiggle room to create concessions that would attract parents to take kids to games like we can. This then gets them hooked at an early age and gets them to go to games even when times are crap.

All this discussion about crowds online is usually just pointless dick waving as there's far more than just looking an average number, unless it's being used in a school playground between kids.
That is an outstanding post…fair play

Everyone can have their own opinion but they cannot have their own facts

Nice work fella 👍
 
"Leeds United is delighted to unveil..."

Will always remind me of this absolute beauty...

If I was the owners I'd make sure I've done my market research on the potential customer base before I start shelling out on this project.

There's a reason why Leeds - despite being one of England's leading club in the last 60's / early 70's and then league champions in 92 - don't already have a stadium bigger than 36k.

They've never had an season average crowd of 40k and when times get hard their crowds drop by 50% at least. I'm sure someone will point out West Ham did it and Everton are doing it but those were both new builds.

They'd better off doing the West Stand first and seeing if this waiting list is as committed as they think it is. A couple of seasons getting tw@tted in the PL will test their current assumptions I suspect.





Have you been drinking? :rolleyes:
Leeds have a catchment area of well over1 million.
 
They didn't even average one season of 30000 when they were in League 1. Highest was 26k. Their fans deserted them.

I might be wrong but I'm sure I read their ticket prices were ridiculously expensive at the time
Leeds have a catchment area of well over1 million.

Aye their catchment area is huge. One club in a big city. Wakefield is about the population of Sunderland and most there will support Leeds I'd imagine.
 
Last edited:
I support Everton, not Sunderland.

Id like to hear a genuine justification from a Leeds fan as to why even when you were one of the top clubs in the country, and your Stadium size allowed it, you couldn't get over 40,000 fans to watch you across a season.

As I said, the peer clubs who Leeds would be compared with - Newcastle, Villa, Sunderland, West Ham, Everton - have all managed it with ease.

Then when you throw in the huge one club City aspect it makes it reflect even worse on Leeds. As much as I don't like them, Newcastle for example put you to shame in that respect, and theyve had far less success in the last 50-60 years than Leeds.
Not sure what concern Leeds stadium expansion on a Sunderland message board is to do with Everton fans mind. During our last sustained spell in the prem 92-04 we had bigger home average attendances than EFC.

Even if I remove 1992-94 when both our home crowds were impacted (our attendances were higher) during stadium renovations that reduced capacity, in the following 11 seasons our home average was bigger than Everton's for 6 of those seasons.
 
Last edited:
I might be wrong but I'm sure I read their ticket prices were ridiculously expensive at the time


Aye their catchment area is huge. One club in a big city. Wakefield is about the population of Sunderland and most there will support Leeds I'd imagine.
Hand on a minute…I got hammered for comparing ‘SFC’ to Huddersfield or Halifax. In any event I am 86% confident that Sunderland are a bigger club than Wakefield 👍
 
It was built to ultimately house 63,000.
Won't ever be needed.
The population of Sunderland is projected to rise by around 50k over the next 25 years, probably similar numbers for county Durham, and with football becoming more watched we will need to increase the stadium, especially if we have a period of relative success.
 
The population of Sunderland is projected to rise by around 50k over the next 25 years, probably similar numbers for county Durham, and with football becoming more watched we will need to increase the stadium, especially if we have a period of relative success.
They'll all be going to watch the mags.
 
Back
Top