ir35
Striker
Ive got to the point where I go to every game expecting these clowns to be pathetic and aim rarely wrong.Then all refs should follow it.
Consistency is a huge issue
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ive got to the point where I go to every game expecting these clowns to be pathetic and aim rarely wrong.Then all refs should follow it.
Consistency is a huge issue
Look at the rules, stud's up, over the top of the ball, not in control, this dangerous tackle.Are you on about us yellow? It was never a red man
He was shouting at him waving his arms.We know exactly what he said and he’s booked one player in the game for using a swear word not even directed at the ref but just in a general remark ffs. Thick as mince.
Would you book someone for saying that’s a f***ing foul?This is entirely predictable.
Years and years on here I read refs been too soft and not standing up to players calling them and been called soft pricks.
Yet when he does stands up to players guess what he is still a prick!!!
No wonder refs can’t win!!
Refs should stand up to players calling them but of course not to Sunderland players!!!
Tony Mowbray is quoted by Sky saying that's what happen when asked at half-time.It is not the rule at all. Its a warning, not a caution. There is no evidence Neill received any warning today about dissent.
TM wasn't there either. It's dissent, and bookable.Are you calling him and TM a liar?
Last minute of the half in a derby atmosphere, how about the referee reads the occasion and gives him a warning like 99% of referees would. Instead the referee made it all about him.There's no technically about it , it is the rule , he applied the rule,he is wrong if he does and he's wrong if he doesn't, you can't have it both ways , they should apply the rule all the time , Neil was out of order and rightly got punished.
Guidelines say a warning, not a booking.TM wasn't there either. It's dissent, and bookable.
He wasn't swearing at the ref.He was using an expletive as a adjective. Saying "You're f***ing useless" is dissent. What Dan said is what's usually called industrial language, and refs normally ignore it.
So you are saying the ref got the decisions right?TM wasn't there either. It's dissent, and bookable.
Probably not thought it was a tad harsh if he just said that.Would you book someone for saying that’s a f***ing foul?
Look at the rules, stud's up, over the top of the ball, not in control, this dangerous tackle.
It should have been a red.
The ref was bad, but for both teams.
He may have been warned. The guidelines probably say that challenge was a red too!Guidelines say a warning, not a booking.
Probably not though it was a tad harsh if he just said that.
However it was very unprofessional of a professional footballer player to do that while already on a yellow card and game standing at 0 0.
How about a professional footballer reading the fact he on a yellow card and been more disciplined.Last minute of the half in a derby atmosphere, how about the referee reads the occasion and gives him a warning like 99% of referees would. Instead the referee made it all about him.
Hes a young man. The ref is more mature and should have used common senseProbably not thought it was a tad harsh if he just said that.
However it was very unprofessional of a professional footballer player to do that while already on a yellow card and game standing at 0 0.
I wouldn’t either some would that’s the problem we need rules and consistency from those above VAR is a prime example of referees work on opinions they need more guidanceProbably not though it was a tad harsh if he just said that.
However it was very unprofessional of a professional footballer player to do that while already on a yellow card and game standing at 0 0.