• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC/Sportswashing - Summer 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nukehasslefan said:
If Newcastle were owned by Kyril and co and Sunderland were taken over by the PIF, Reuben, and Staveley, Sunderland fans would be crucified by Newcastle fans in near-exact ways that are happening now, in this situation, so I get the resentment on top of the natural hatred by a portion of fans.
Click to expand...
But thank fuck we are not so I can still go to games and not witness simpletons waving their flags and defending their horrific backward culture.
 

Thatheaderman said:
Fair points but the " business wise" is so important in the allies part. I dont believe for one minute they would be allies without financial reward and particularly not with culture. Along with that I believe weapons and oil exchange is the only reason they're tolerated. Guess money makes the world go around
Click to expand...

It definitely does mate. It's a sad state of affairs that a regime with so much blood on their hands has been welcomed into our game purely because of how much cash they bring with them. What's even sadder is the fact that pretty much all of them have ignored the facts and decided to welcome them into their club n'all.

Like you say, money talks and bullshit walks.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
If Newcastle were owned by Kyril and co and Sunderland were taken over by the PIF, Reuben, and Staveley, Sunderland fans would be crucified by Newcastle fans in near-exact ways that are happening now, in this situation, so I get the resentment on top of the natural hatred by a portion of fans.
Click to expand...
Exactly as you are a massive bunch of hypocrites.

The only difference is you wouldn't have Sunderland fans defending them online. You wouldn't have over 100k signatures on a petition.

Well you may have some Sunderland fans defending but you wouldn't have the majority of them like with your lot.

They will be more happy with what your fans do on twitter than how the team does on the pitch.

Why is that?
Sportswashing..
 
Nukehasslefan said:
If Newcastle were owned by Kyril and co and Sunderland were taken over by the PIF, Reuben, and Staveley, Sunderland fans would be crucified by Newcastle fans in near-exact ways that are happening now, in this situation, so I get the resentment on top of the natural hatred by a portion of fans.
Click to expand...
But….and you know this, but you fancy yourself as some kind of ‘talking head’….the difference is, a FAR higher percentage of SAFC fans would actively protest against it and would boycott the club until PIF had left.
Myself included.

So…the question has to be asked….”What did you do during the Sportswash Daddy?”
 
FatDrummer said:
But….and you know this, but you fancy yourself as some kind of ‘talking head’….the difference is, a FAR higher percentage of SAFC fans would actively protest against it and would boycott the club until PIF had left.
Myself included.

So…the question has to be asked….”What did you do during the Sportswash Daddy?”
Click to expand...
I'm afraid you are writing bollocks. Your stadium would go back to being full. You could even re-open the upper levels. To suggest otherwise you're living in outer space feeding on moon cheese.
 
BigPete said:
Exactly as you are a massive bunch of hypocrites.
Click to expand...
I agree and not just Newcastle fans. All people. It's just a case of when the hypocrisy comes to the fore.
BigPete said:
The only difference is you wouldn't have Sunderland fans defending them online. You wouldn't have over 100k signatures on a petition.
Click to expand...
That all depends on any situation.
BigPete said:
Well you may have some Sunderland fans defending but you wouldn't have the majority of them like with your lot.
Click to expand...
Some, many, few, majority, minority.
BigPete said:
They will be more happy with what your fans do on twitter than how the team does on the pitch.
Click to expand...
Some, many, few, majority, or minority?
BigPete said:
Why is that?
Sportswashing..
Click to expand...
I'd be honest and say many would be looking at what Newcastle can achieve against anything else cast out.
That would go for any club or anything really.
 
weebil64 said:
But I was making the point about te endless parade of Tory apologists and enablers trooped out on TV being on a par with Mags defending their supreme leader. But Labour aye. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
.. I don't give a shit. You always point out the Tories involvement but never Labour. I'm balancing the equation.. But both of the horrible f'in parties ..
 
FatDrummer said:
But….and you know this, but you fancy yourself as some kind of ‘talking head’….the difference is, a FAR higher percentage of SAFC fans would actively protest against it and would boycott the club until PIF had left.
Myself included.
Click to expand...
As it stands no one could really argue your stance other than to offer hypotheticals as you are doing right now.
FatDrummer said:
So…the question has to be asked….”What did you do during the Sportswash Daddy?”
Click to expand...
The answer would be watching the fortunes of Newcastle United and taking an interest in Newcastle United's day-to-day players.
 
VXi said:
"I watched the Mackems on the SMB disappear up their own hoops with faux rage son - where's wa magpie movers?"
Click to expand...
But….what did you do about the Sportswash. This is not about us. It is about the supporters of Newcastle United Football Club completely throwing out any moral fibre that they may have had for the promise of blood money.
So I will adjust the question:
”What did you DO about the Sportswash, Daddy?”
 
andyj73 said:
.. I don't give a shit. You always point out the Tories involvement but never Labour. I'm balancing the equation.. But both of the horrible f'in parties ..
Click to expand...
I'm not pointing out the Tories involvement in anything other than lies, as far as I'm aware thry've nowt to do with the mags. You are the one linking them. Labour have no involvement either, other than a sycophant MP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top