• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC and other Sportswashing Spring 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skylon said:
You said its wrong ,because the morals of normal people around you think it's wrong.Thats not you personally thinking it's wrong.Therefore,you condone it.Dodgepot.
Click to expand...


For years Newcastle supporters have claimed Chelsea bought trophies with dirty money.

Who'd have thought their club would be owned by people who make Abramovich look like a decent bloke :lol:
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
He actually did but not to the extent that some fans wanted.
Basically, he was never going to keep up with the rich clubs who were bankrolled, just as we are going to be, which I believe is wrong.
Click to expand...
He did a decent job mate, Newcastle were a regular Premier League club and during a time of financial troubles kept them running.
Exile 1968 said:
You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
Aye, but Disney man ;)
 
Last edited:
Morse said:
The absolute moron just has to be on a wind up...right?
Click to expand...
Nope.
PaddySAFC97 said:
@Mackemmichael is a blatant mag. It’s such a giveaway that the account was created on the same day as the takeover.
Click to expand...
And outed shortly thereafter.
Junior Birdman said:
Eddie Howe needs to understand he's going to be asked 'difficult' none football related questions. That what happens when you accept a job where your wages are paid by owners with blood on their hands.
Click to expand...
He’s put himself in this position. He’s in a high profile job. Surely he must have been prepared for the questions that would be asked of him, been prepared to defend his position?
Sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting la la la I’m not listening just makes him look silly and even more of an unprincipled mercenary.
Harbour Boy said:
Michael Martin's account.
Click to expand...
He’s certainly thick enough
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nukehasslefan said:
Not at all. It covers all people, not just one group.
The fact the rivalry is there when we talk on this forum only heightens what I'm saying. It isn't specific to you.


Yes because it covers all people in all countries, not just football fans.

I never believed it was anything other than barbaric which covers many many countries who do similar stuff and call it the consequence of war.
Then you get people who back that act and then reel back in horror at another when it's basically all the same thing.
Subjective morality covers it all with people. It's just a simple case of when it rears its head, kind of thing.


No innocent human being should be killed or injured by deliberate acts but it happens all over the known populations of countries in many ways.
We are basically, pack animals and will believe we are morally right to do such things when the time comes, as we have in wars. Like I said, subjective morality and that's on the bigger issue of war.
the rest comes down to consumerism and what's acceptable and what's not when the time and a position suits.

Subjective morality we can't hide away from.

There's a load of criticism at all times by many different groups for many many different things with many objections to different states on what their humanitarian goings-on are but we forget our own because we're made to believe we're a country of basic morals and innocence.
Click to expand...
The only reply I'm going to give is, take a step back and think what you're posting here. Stop hiding behind the "its their culture, we can't comprehend it" and the those who live in glass houses routine.
Your club is a vehicle for these people in fact, they don't consider it your club at all, it is a PR exercise for some of the most evil fuckers we've seen for a century who know they can do what they want. Now, if you want to compartmentalise this and utilise some GCSE Sociology to claim its the natural human pysche merely because the club they have devoured is your own then crack-on but don't be coming on here claiming we are employing subjective morality when children are being massacred and we are disgusted these c unts are allowed to waltz into our national sport like missionaries.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Not at all. It covers all people, not just one group.
The fact the rivalry is there when we talk on this forum only heightens what I'm saying. It isn't specific to you.


Yes because it covers all people in all countries, not just football fans.

I never believed it was anything other than barbaric which covers many many countries who do similar stuff and call it the consequence of war.
Then you get people who back that act and then reel back in horror at another when it's basically all the same thing.
Subjective morality covers it all with people. It's just a simple case of when it rears its head, kind of thing.


No innocent human being should be killed or injured by deliberate acts but it happens all over the known populations of countries in many ways.
We are basically, pack animals and will believe we are morally right to do such things when the time comes, as we have in wars. Like I said, subjective morality and that's on the bigger issue of war.
the rest comes down to consumerism and what's acceptable and what's not when the time and a position suits.

Subjective morality we can't hide away from.

There's a load of criticism at all times by many different groups for many many different things with many objections to different states on what their humanitarian goings-on are but we forget our own because we're made to believe we're a country of basic morals and innocence.
Click to expand...
None of the above justifies their ownership of what was once your club.
 
Dilligaf60 said:
None of the above justifies their ownership of what was once your club.
Click to expand...

I've seen it mentioned a few times that there's now a thick black line drawn between pre-Saudis and post-Saudis at Newcastle. Everything before they bought the club, and the minds of the supporters, is 'history' and everything from now on is tainted.

I'd say that's true, they've thrown away their history for a bag of gold.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
I've explained to you a dozen times why there's no such thing. Cut the crap once and for all. Something is moral, or it ain't - end of story,
Click to expand...
Exactly mate. He's been indicating all along that we pick and choose our morality in line with who we support, its so transparent man. Its children being killed - loves ended, done. If these c unts had bought Bristol City or Crewe, I'd be every bit as disgusted but, its those who are so keen to defend them because they'll buy them the odd expensive fullback that really has me shaking my head.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
I've explained to you a dozen times why there's no such thing. Cut the crap once and for all. Something is moral, or it ain't - end of story,
Click to expand...

Yes but, surely if it's someone's culture it can't be immoral!!!

Hitler, the Third Reich and the Jews for example.

Oops, sorry I didn't think that through.

Wait there and I'll come back with a better example :confused:
 
Father Jack Hackett said:
Exactly mate. He's been indicating all along that we pick and choose our morality in line with who we support, its so transparent man. Its children being killed - loves ended, done. If these c unts had bought Bristol City or Crewe, I'd be every bit as disgusted but, its those who are so keen to defend them because they'll buy them the odd expensive fullback that really has me shaking my head.
Click to expand...

Something is moral or not, Whether or not we take an immoral action is a matter of personal choice. Very few people are capable of making morally correct decisions 100% of the time. So our lives are a mixture of conscious morally or immorally correct decisions, or amoral decisions, those made without considerations of the moral correctness at all. I'd suggest that the Mags (or a large percentage of them) are currently making an amoral decision in relation to their owners.
 
Last edited:
Mags embarrassing and disgracing themselves on here I see trying to defend their brutal neanderthal child bombing murdering owners instead of just saying yep we wanted them we knew what and who they were we just have to deal with the flak coming our way.

The mags are a f***ing disgrace and pond life tbh. If your fanbase signed a petition with over 100,000 names on it demanding the government and premier League let the Saudis in then please don't f***ing whinge and cry that it's not fair when the condemnation of the world comes your way
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top