Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any occupation would be more straightforward than Iraq or Afghanistan. For a start there will be a portion (how big would be the question) of the population who would be all for it, more so in Eastern Ukraine. Culturally they have alot in common.Makes me wonder if the west actually wants Russia to invade, the easy bit is an invasion. Occupying a country is a completely different ball game, as we found out in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Any war that pitted the US and NATO vs China and Russia - fought without the use of nukes - would be a whitewash in favour of the US and NATO.The ace card in this discussion is China, if there is a conflict between Russia and the US, Europe will start off as a US proxy but end up doing the bulk work. Europe cannot defeat Russia in a serious conflict and if the US get stretched China will have gains to make by joining the conflict.
Remember the problems we had in Northern Ireland? It doesn’t matter if some of the population support the occupation as long as a significant minority don’t there will be problems. Increasingly those problems tend to be taken to the occupying country. A few well placed bombs in Russian cities and suddenly the civilian population takes notice. Troubles abroad are one thing but troubles at home are another. Bomb hoaxes are almost as disruptive as bombs and less risky. I remember being unable to use the university library on several occasions because of bomb threats and that was in Dundee not one of the most prominent targets. That went on for decades - it almost didn’t feel like Christmas without the annual bombing in London and other cities to keep Christmas shoppers on their toes. I’m sure those lessons have been learnt by Ukrainians.Any occupation would be more straightforward than Iraq or Afghanistan. For a start there will be a portion (how big would be the question) of the population who would be all for it, more so in Eastern Ukraine. Culturally they have alot in common.
I do wonder whether it's a case of now or never for Putin. Similar to Brexit, the younger generations are increasingly leaning toward the West.
Any war that pitted the US and NATO vs China and Russia - fought without the use of nukes - would be a whitewash in favour of the US and NATO.
Most of russias military tech is on its last legs. And if china’s is built like everything else they build, it’ll be cheap tat that breaks within minutes of use
We don’t agree then, the political strife in the US and Europe, the mere fact we can’t agree on anything suggests to me we wouldn’t have any appetite for any sort of drawn out conflict. NATO contains Turkey doesn’t it? NATO could fall apart due to internal conflict. Iraq and Israel could go all in, Israel might lose its head and go first if things were collapsing. The West is done, it cannot contain the world under it’s hegemony like the past.
Started early or still on it from last night?
With respect, I disagree.The ace card in this discussion is China, if there is a conflict between Russia and the US, Europe will start off as a US proxy but end up doing the bulk work. Europe cannot defeat Russia in a serious conflict and if the US get stretched China will have gains to make by joining the conflict.
He messed up the title.Your finest yet.
No one will remember once it’s finished though![]()
A full scale conventional war for China against the USA and its Eastern allies would be risky for China. They have a large army but the number of combat troops is much lower than what they quote as they include those working as regional police and other roles in the total. The places they could go is limited. They would probably attempt an invasion of Taiwan but that would be costly. They could move against South Korea but that is well defended. The Chinese do have some modern technological weapons but nowhere near the level of the USA. Even if they combined naval operations with the Russians I doubt they could be much of a match for the US Pacific Fleet. On their own doorstep they would face South Korean, Japanese, American and Australian forces and even Vietnam is now leaning towards being more sympathetic to those forces than China's who who they hate with a passion. China would be better off staying out of such a conflict for a good few years yet.The ace card in this discussion is China, if there is a conflict between Russia and the US, Europe will start off as a US proxy but end up doing the bulk work. Europe cannot defeat Russia in a serious conflict and if the US get stretched China will have gains to make by joining the conflict.
The ace card in this discussion is China, if there is a conflict between Russia and the US, Europe will start off as a US proxy but end up doing the bulk work. Europe cannot defeat Russia in a serious conflict and if the US get stretched China will have gains to make by joining the conflict.
With respect, I disagree.
The European armed forces can certainly defeat our Russian equivalents, particularly if we are defending. The Russians risk absolutely catastrophic losses if they advance any further than the contested areas of eastern Ukraine.
I was hugely impressed and humbled with the UAF when I was teaching in their university last year. They’re proud and capable, not to mention determined.
There’s zero chance of China entering a full scale war against the countries that all the cheap shit it exportsA full scale conventional war for China against the USA and its Eastern allies would be risky for China. They have a large army but the number of combat troops is much lower than what they quote as they include those working as regional police and other roles in the total. The places they could go is limited. They would probably attempt an invasion of Taiwan but that would be costly. They could move against South Korea but that is well defended. The Chinese do have some modern technological weapons but nowhere near the level of the USA. Even if they combined naval operations with the Russians I doubt they could be match for the US Pacific Fleet. On their own doorstep they would face South Korean, Japanese, American and Australian forces and even Vietnam is now mow leaning towards being more sympathetic to those forces than China's who who they hate with a passion. China would be better off staying out of such a conflict for a good few years yet.
Consider a European war effort that contains the different nations, some will naturally be dissenting, it will cause political strife and a bogged down bureaucracy and if Germany/France override protocols due to necessity it causes further break downs in a war effort. Europe cannot fight effectively against a major power for these reasons.
lets indulge this fantasy for a moment
in a war with Russia, the US heavy lifters would be the Air Force and the Army
in a war with China, the US heavy lifters would be the US Navy and US Marines
America would not be stretched in any meaningful way if involved in a limited war in Europe and the Pacific, and the minute they start to feel stretched is where they'll threaten to escalate with nukes
On the flip side, many European countries have joint battalions and squadrons, so can cooperate together.
Yes it can, that's why they exercise and work together so they can be effective when needed.Consider a European war effort that contains the different nations, some will naturally be dissenting, it will cause political strife and a bogged down bureaucracy and if Germany/France override protocols due to necessity it causes further break downs in a war effort. Europe cannot fight effectively against a major power for these reasons.