Put a flat earthier into space

[West_Winger]

Never known a supposedly grown adult go on like a complete petulant wanksplat.

It’s bad enough dismissing literally everything that has been put forward to him on here but also the fact he’s called every science experiment and scientists liars and stupid and come back with fuck all.
The bloke is a moron of the highest order

Water Flat blah blah f***ing blah

He’s a newcastle fan. Nuff said really.

 

[legend7]

Of course there is. Why? ....Because there is no proof.


The experiments are simple and you basically know how to do them but refuse to acknowledge them because it goes against the grain. I know this and you know this.

Which experiment that is simple did you do to prove the centre is made of crystals?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Oh, don't forget the spirit level on a raft on a lake experiment.

It always shows the bubble in the middle of the spirit level therefore the lake is flat.

I saw a flat earth video where some clown took a spirit level on a plane to prove they fly level

 

[What A Waster]

Bad news lads. I've just ran a bath and even though it's deeper at one end, the surface is flat. Checked with a permanent marker and a spirit level.

 

[payne]

Bad news lads. I've just ran a bath and even though it's deeper at one end, the surface is flat. Checked with a permanent marker and a spirit level.

I filled a pale up and work and before I added cleaning solution I placed it on the ground and let the water settle. It looked level to the naked eye so I'm now convinced.

 

[DPTT]

I poured water over a balloon while rotating it and the water didn’t shoot off

What does that mean

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

I poured water over a balloon while rotating it and the water didn’t shoot off

What does that mean

You might be in space. Can you breathe?

 

[DPTT]

You might be in space. Can you breathe?

Well I hyper ventilated over the confusion it caused

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Well I hyper ventilated over the confusion it caused

Do a really big fart and test out rocket propulsion in space while you're up(down) there.

 

[DaveH]

Of course there is. Why? ....Because there is no proof.


The experiments are simple and you basically know how to do them but refuse to acknowledge them because it goes against the grain. I know this and you know this.

I don’t think I do know how to do them. Why not assume I’m a bit simple and explain it to me? After all, 330 pages I don’t think you have addressed it.

I get up tomorrow morning uncertain as to what shape the earth is. Is it flat, is it a globe, is it Cornish pasty shaped? How can I prove it.

Walk me through the experiment that I can simply try that is 100% absolute proof we are not on a spinning globe.

 

[BigPete]

Lads stop wasting ya time..

 

[The Krankie Returns]

Lads stop wasting ya time..

Been saying that for a while on this thread. He’s a wum.

 

[fyl2u]

Been saying that for a while on this thread. He’s a wum.

Not convinced he's a wum. I think he's just super thick.

 

[The Krankie Returns]

Not convinced he's a wum. I think he's just super thick.

I’ve been trying not to follow this but I keep coming back.
As I read it, the basic argument from him is that he’s not seen it so he can’t verify it therefore it’s not real. Is that about right? And flat water.

 

[fyl2u]

I’ve been trying not to follow this but I keep coming back.
As I read it, the basic argument from him is that he’s not seen it so he can’t verify it therefore it’s not real. Is that about right? And flat water.

Something like that.

He refuses to do any experiment that tests his cellworld flat earth theory AGAINST the globe model.
He refuses to acknowledge any scientific knowledge presented by anyone that isn't a globe denier.
He can't follow even the most basic primary school maths put in front of him.
He misuses various scientific words that he thinks he understands.

And he lies constantly.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

I know this has been touched on previously in this thread: can you advise why we can’t see the top of Everest from Sunderland? It’s the highest point on both flat earth and globe theories, yet it can’t be seen unless you’re in a certain range. I’m happy with the globe reasoning. But I’d like to explore your understanding of why.

Atmospheric dense barrier over distance.

Never known a supposedly grown adult go on like a complete petulant wanksplat.

It’s bad enough dismissing literally everything that has been put forward to him on here but also the fact he’s called every science experiment and scientists liars and stupid and come back with fuck all.
The bloke is a moron of the highest order

Water Flat blah blah f***ing blah

The silly thing is....it is. It's certainly not curved. And that simple little silly thing nails the spinning globe dead in that water.
And it's not me going on like what you describe. Look in the mirror.

It is easily proved and you have been shown how to prove it to yourself. You don't want to.

You forget I used to be just like the rest who believed the globe, so it's not any case of just not wanting to. It's a case of finding out it's nonsense.

No it isn't or you'd be sucking up all the info laid out for you in this thread and checking it all out. You have your theory and you're defending it rather than looking for any true reality.

I'm defending my thoughts because I spent time getting to this point.
As for looking for true reality. That's exactly what I'm trying to do and the biggest starter is ridding my mind of the utter nonsense of a spinning globe.

There's the curvature of water,

None.

there's the seasons

Seasons mean nothing for a spinning globe.

, day and night,

Means nothing for a spinning globe.

the "apparent motion" of the stars (yes we're back there again and the motion is still only apparent),

Yes, apparent. We clearly know by our senses that the points of light move over and arund us and we do not move under them whilst stuck to a sphere.

there's the observation of Polaris dipping lower in the sky as you move south in a manner only possible on a globe.

Anything will move lower to your eye if you walk away from it.

All these before you start looking at the received knowledge of scientists and physicists, astronomers and astronauts over many years.

Received knowledge?

There's none that you want to accept, but that's an entirely different matter, as you know.

There's plenty of stuff I'll accept but it doesn't involve a spinning globe and space vacuums they tell us about, plus 2 million mile plus circumference of a central burning sun in this vacuum...and so on and so on.

I didn't say your Earth thought process, I said your non globe theory, which is central to the whole thread. It's a globe and you choose to deny this.

A cell maybe. A spinning globe...not a chance in hell.

I have no problem with questioning things. Questioning things should be the default position. You are not questioning, you're just refusing to look at or accept anything that contradicts the story you have already settled on.

You feel free to decide what you think I'm doing or not doing. It changes nothing from my side.

Utter bullshit. You know any real experiment will prove the globe and you know you have no real experiments of your own.

Your opinion.

That's why you keep saying stuff like "the experiments are easy" and "put your mind to it" instead of just explaining what these easy experiments are.

I offered experiments but they were waved away.

The only one you've given so far is so ridiculous you've tried to distance yourself from the details ever since but still cling to it as your main proof.

If you mean water level then it is a nailed on proof. You won;t accept it because it clearly destroys the spinning globe set up. It's like taking the foundation card out of the stack. The rest come tumbling down.

The curve you know you're going to find if you ever do the real experiments/measurements.

Water conforms to the container it's in. It does not curve within.
The closest you'll ever get to a curve is a water fall or a small container filled to the brim where atmospheric crush against the edges of the small container creates a crush back against the small amount of water. It works just the same with droplets of water.

n large bodies of water the only curves you'll see are waves and ripples.
At rest there's no water curve and also the reason for it is because the Earth is absolutely 100% not a spinning globe.

I've told you where to look. I cant see it for you.

I've done enough looking to know we don't live on a spinning globe.

I don’t think I do know how to do them. Why not assume I’m a bit simple and explain it to me? After all, 330 pages I don’t think you have addressed it.

I get up tomorrow morning uncertain as to what shape the earth is. Is it flat, is it a globe, is it Cornish pasty shaped? How can I prove it.

Walk me through the experiment that I can simply try that is 100% absolute proof we are not on a spinning globe.

You seem smart enough. Go and do some simple experiments and you can rule ourt the silly thoughts like Cornish pasty shapes and spinning globe shapes.

Not convinced he's a wum. I think he's just super thick.

And yet you and others waste your time on me. Why?
The sensible thing to do when you're dealing with someone as thick as me is to bin me or simply ignore anything I say.
Or you could spend all your time trying to ridicule me but then again can you ridicule a thick person and believe that thick person understands ridicule?

I see many complain that I'm this that and the other and I see people come in for a dig like they're looking for a high five and a case of " your turn now" and then I see people crying that I'm a wind up merchant and a troll.

You know my stance. You know I'm not going to bow down unless one of you provides proof and you also know offering ridicule en masse does not constitute a proof.

My advice would be to ignore me and get on with whatever else you have to do.
I'm just trying to help.

 

[Nobby]

Atmospheric dense barrier over distance

Is a new term we have never had before.

It sounds like an equation, what is the unit of measurement of Atmospheric dense barrier that is divided by distance?

I'm just trying to help

If you are trying to help then share your experiments

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Is a new term we have never had before.

It sounds like an equation, what is the unit of measurement of Atmospheric dense barrier that is divided by distance?

If you are trying to help then share your experiments

Start by questioning your global model before you even think about doing any experiments.

 

[BigPete]

Not convinced he's a wum. I think he's just super thick.

He is like nobody can be that stupid.

Hes either an ignorant idiot or a WUM.

Either way wasting your time..

 

[Nobby]

Start by questioning your global model before you even think about doing any experiments.

If my mind wasn't open I wouldn't want to do or understand the experiment.

What is the unit of measurement of atmospheric dense barrier in your equation?