• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
Atmospheric dense barrier over distance.

The silly thing is....it is. It's certainly not curved. And that simple little silly thing nails the spinning globe dead in that water.
And it's not me going on like what you describe. Look in the mirror.

You forget I used to be just like the rest who believed the globe, so it's not any case of just not wanting to. It's a case of finding out it's nonsense.

I'm defending my thoughts because I spent time getting to this point.
As for looking for true reality. That's exactly what I'm trying to do and the biggest starter is ridding my mind of the utter nonsense of a spinning globe.

None.

Seasons mean nothing for a spinning globe.

Means nothing for a spinning globe.


Yes, apparent. We clearly know by our senses that the points of light move over and arund us and we do not move under them whilst stuck to a sphere.

Anything will move lower to your eye if you walk away from it.

Received knowledge?

There's plenty of stuff I'll accept but it doesn't involve a spinning globe and space vacuums they tell us about, plus 2 million mile plus circumference of a central burning sun in this vacuum...and so on and so on.

A cell maybe. A spinning globe...not a chance in hell.

You feel free to decide what you think I'm doing or not doing. It changes nothing from my side.

Your opinion.

I offered experiments but they were waved away.


If you mean water level then it is a nailed on proof. You won;t accept it because it clearly destroys the spinning globe set up. It's like taking the foundation card out of the stack. The rest come tumbling down.

Water conforms to the container it's in. It does not curve within.
The closest you'll ever get to a curve is a water fall or a small container filled to the brim where atmospheric crush against the edges of the small container creates a crush back against the small amount of water. It works just the same with droplets of water.

n large bodies of water the only curves you'll see are waves and ripples.
At rest there's no water curve and also the reason for it is because the Earth is absolutely 100% not a spinning globe.

I've done enough looking to know we don't live on a spinning globe.

You seem smart enough. Go and do some simple experiments and you can rule ourt the silly thoughts like Cornish pasty shapes and spinning globe shapes.

And yet you and others waste your time on me. Why?
The sensible thing to do when you're dealing with someone as thick as me is to bin me or simply ignore anything I say.
Or you could spend all your time trying to ridicule me but then again can you ridicule a thick person and believe that thick person understands ridicule?

I see many complain that I'm this that and the other and I see people come in for a dig like they're looking for a high five and a case of " your turn now" and then I see people crying that I'm a wind up merchant and a troll.

You know my stance. You know I'm not going to bow down unless one of you provides proof and you also know offering ridicule en masse does not constitute a proof.

My advice would be to ignore me and get on with whatever else you have to do.
I'm just trying to help.
Click to expand...
What experiment did you do that proves water is flat?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'm defending my thoughts because I spent time getting to this point.
As for looking for true reality. That's exactly what I'm trying to do and the biggest starter is ridding my mind of the utter nonsense of a spinning globe.
Click to expand...
Yeah some of those YouTube vids do go on a bit.
Ridding your mind of utter nonsense would be a fine place to start.
Nukehasslefan said:
Seasons mean nothing for a spinning globe.

Means nothing for a spinning globe.
Click to expand...
Day and night and the seasons mean nothing for a spinning globe?
Nukehasslefan said:
Yes, apparent. We clearly know by our senses that the points of light move over and arund us and we do not move under them whilst stuck to a sphere.
Click to expand...
As I thought, you dont know what "apparent motion" means. You're still happy to form a ridiculous opinion based on it though.
Nukehasslefan said:
Anything will move lower to your eye if you walk away from it.
Click to expand...
If the surface of Earth was not curved you could walk from end to end and still see Polaris in the same place.
Nukehasslefan said:
I offered experiments but they were waved away.
Click to expand...
You have been asked for these mythical experiments dozens of times and the only thing you have offered is a visual check of the bath water and the stupid spirit level and pen thing. If you have more post them, if there are posts I have missed, point them out.
Nukehasslefan said:
If you mean water level then it is a nailed on proof. You won;t accept it because it clearly destroys the spinning globe set up. It's like taking the foundation card out of the stack. The rest come tumbling down.

Water conforms to the container it's in. It does not curve within.
The closest you'll ever get to a curve is a water fall or a small container filled to the brim where atmospheric crush against the edges of the small container creates a crush back against the small amount of water. It works just the same with droplets of water.
Click to expand...
Repeated ad infinitum but you still wont go and check it for real.
Nukehasslefan said:
I've done enough looking to know we don't live on a spinning globe.
Click to expand...
Is anyone keeping score here?
Nukehasslefan said:
And yet you and others waste your time on me. Why?
The sensible thing to do when you're dealing with someone as thick as me is to bin me or simply ignore anything I say.
My advice would be to ignore me and get on with whatever else you have to do.
Click to expand...
You're right. The only sensible thing you've posted in the whole thread.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Whatever you want to think.
Click to expand...
If the unit of measurement can be anything I want it to be it can't be anything other than made up.
It has no meaning if I can measure "atmospheric dense barrier" in Newtons but someone else can choose to measure it in Labrador puppies
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Yeah some of those YouTube vids do go on a bit.
Ridding your mind of utter nonsense would be a fine place to start.
Click to expand...
It's not easy but water level is a great place to start.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Day and night and the seasons mean nothing for a spinning globe?
Click to expand...
Correct.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
As I thought, you dont know what "apparent motion" means. You're still happy to form a ridiculous opinion based on it though.
Click to expand...
Apparent...hmmm, let's look it up.
seeming real or true, but not necessarily so.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
If the surface of Earth was not curved you could walk from end to end and still see Polaris in the same place.
Click to expand...
Nope.
Distance and atmospheric mass will scupper that.

The Snockerty Friddle said:
You have been asked for these mythical experiments dozens of times and the only thing you have offered is a visual check of the bath water and the stupid spirit level and pen thing. If you have more post them, if there are posts I have missed, point them out.
Click to expand...
If you want to do your own experiments then you're free to do so but first of all you need to question your spinning globe in order for you to genuinely do that.
I don;t see you or anyone wanting to divert from the accepted norm, which is fine by me.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
You're right. The only sensible thing you've posted in the whole thread.
Click to expand...
Yep. The Earth is not a spinning globe.
 
taipeisafc said:
Are we back in this loop again - like Groundhog day this thread. I can't wait for the response.....edit I missed the reply "many simple ones" hmm I wonder what he is referring to.......
Click to expand...
Yep

Still think he believes this stuff.

Problem is he has had his arguments totally deconstructed and is out of his depth. The only way he is able to respond is to double down into repetition and trolling, which has been clear in the way he has been posting since the end of last week.

Atmospheric dense barrier (a new term he has created) can be measured in any unit you choose, but is apparently a real thing and is part of an equation with distance. A prime example of his new trolling
 
Nobby said:
Yep

Still think he believes this stuff.

Problem is he has had his arguments totally deconstructed and is out of his depth. The only way he is able to respond is to double down into repetition and trolling, which has been clear in the way he has been posting since the end of last week.

Atmospheric dense barrier (a new term he has created) can be measured in any unit you choose, but is apparently a real thing and is part of an equation with distance. A prime example of his new trolling
Click to expand...

If you google "atmospheric dense barrier" in quotation marks, there is no result for it.

How dare you suggest he's just pulled it out his arse because it sounds like it could be something
Nukehasslefan said:
It's not easy but water level is a great place to start.

Correct.

Apparent...hmmm, let's look it up.
seeming real or true, but not necessarily so.

Nope.
Distance and atmospheric mass will scupper that.


If you want to do your own experiments then you're free to do so but first of all you need to question your spinning globe in order for you to genuinely do that.
I don;t see you or anyone wanting to divert from the accepted norm, which is fine by me.

Yep. The Earth is not a spinning globe.
Click to expand...

How do you explain hydrothermal coagulation on your cell world?

Or fusion dependent dimesmeric overspill?
 
Last edited:
DPTT said:
@Nukehasslefan can you tell us what instruments (if any) you used in your water level experiment.

It was also stated that the curvature over 6ft would not be observable with the naked eye, do you agree or disagree with that?
Click to expand...

He put the maths up for calculating the so called curve on the so called globe. 8 inches per mile squared.
At a 10th of a mile using those maths it's 0.08 inches.
So obviously when you scale that down to a swimming pool or a bath you'd have a curve which is imperceptible to the naked eye.
But he said "you don't need to work it out any less than a mile"
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It's not easy but water level is a great place to start.

Correct.

Apparent...hmmm, let's look it up.
seeming real or true, but not necessarily so.

Nope.
Distance and atmospheric mass will scupper that.


If you want to do your own experiments then you're free to do so but first of all you need to question your spinning globe in order for you to genuinely do that.
I don;t see you or anyone wanting to divert from the accepted norm, which is fine by me.

Yep. The Earth is not a spinning globe.
Click to expand...


Do you reject everything you don't understand and come up with alternative narratives that 'seem right' to you.
 
BigPete said:
He is like nobody can be that stupid.

Hes either an ignorant idiot or a WUM.

Either way wasting your time..
Click to expand...

I'm here for science. It's a dirty job but someone's got to do it. We can't have brainwashed idiot pseudoscientists running wild spreading their lies unchallenged.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top