Michael Vaughan



No. He was asked the question are you seriously suggesting that Moeen should be challrnging random Muslims in the street to ask if they are terrorists. To which he replied ‘Yes’ if it keeps us safe. A comment which he had said today he is ashamed of. He is equally ashamed of the London comment, fair play to Vaughan for that but if you think it’s lighthearted banter then shame on you. How brilliant he was as a captain is absolutely neither here nor there but I would argue that it was Hussain and Fletcher who lifted us from the cricketing basement.

Do you think Vaughan has shown any shame in those past statements up till today ?
I don’t, think he’s finally having to realise he can’t just brazen his way out of the current situation.
 
Do you think Vaughan has shown any shame in those past statements up till today ?
I don’t, think he’s finally having to realise he can’t just brazen his way out of the current situation.
I agree and the timing is the key. He could have said this 2 weeks ago but has waited until he was banned from TMS and there are issues with BTSport / Fox. It’s self preservation.
 

Inclined to agree, pretty awkward. His body language is not great and it’s telling when asked ‘is he embarrassed’ about the tweets, he shakes his head while saying “absolutely”.

It’s sad to see, I’ve always been a big fan of his and his role in 2005 cemented his legendary status for me, so like Monty I can’t reconcile that person with the man he’s perceived as today.
From the bbc interview
  • He would "love" to play a part in helping Yorkshire move forward, alongside Rafiq.
Would be easier to believe that if he hadn't refused to cooperate with the enquiry when he'll have been well aware of Yorkshire's intentions around it too.
 
Just listening to his interview on R5 and his frame of reference seems to be that he absolutely isn't racist and what is acceptable is changing so when he was overtly racist 3 years ago not being able to pronounce an Asian players name so calling him Steve... he says that just goes to show how fast what is acceptable is changing

No Vaughan... it wasn't acceptable 3 years ago you mad racist
 

Your wish, etc.
Maybe I am Dan Walker?!
There is so much hatred on this forum for the man who dragged England out of the cricketing basement and took us to the top of the pile captaining us to the greatest ever Ashes victory in the process. The cancel culture is alive and well on this forum.

As a matter of interest he didn't "suggest" Moeen should be challenging random Muslims on the street to check if they are terrorists as he was asked the question whether Moeen could do more in the fight against terrorists and he just answered "yes" Likewise his comment that he needed to learn another language to go London was purely a light hearted throwaway bit of humour.

I assume that Monty Panesar's comments in The Telegraph article were written under duress and therefore should be discounted as we all know that Michael Vaughan is an acolyte of Tommy Robinson as we read it on these boards
Alreet Vaughany? (You’re fooked, btw, thickie)
 
Last edited:
‘I don’t recall saying it. But three people have said I did and I’ll accept what they are saying and they have no reason to lie. I can only apologise as it’s very obviously a ridiculous thing to say. Upon reflection, I’ve also put out some absurd tweets in the past without careful thought in the heat of the moment. I’ve been very thoughtless and regret that but can assure people there was no racist intent. I’ve learned a lot in recent weeks and will think before speaking or publishing and temper my language accordingly’.

Piece of piss this PR lark. PR gurus seemingly get paid for handing out some really poor advice.
 
That's the problem with Twitter, say something a bit thick/ill thought out when passions were running high (as they were after the Manchester Islamist attack) and it's held against you forever.
 
That's the problem with Twitter, say something a bit thick/ill thought out when passions were running high (as they were after the Manchester Islamist attack) and it's held against you forever.
Yes if you are a massive racist don’t put it in writing that’s just stupid. far better say something racist and you can deny it blind years later no matter how many people heard you.
 
Do you think the comments, corroborated by others, to Rafiq are a problem with “ever changing definition”?

you won’t answer realistically. You’ll deflect into something else if you do

I was referring to the Moeen tweet. With the alleged comment to Rafiq, there are definitely other possibilities than "Vaughan made this comment, meant it literally and wholeheartedly and is therefore a racist". You will no doubt jump to the most malicious possibility as you obviously don't like the bloke. Fact is, only he knows if he made that comment and how he meant it.
 
I was referring to the Moeen tweet. With the alleged comment to Rafiq, there are definitely other possibilities than "Vaughan made this comment, meant it literally and wholeheartedly and is therefore a racist". You will no doubt jump to the most malicious possibility as you obviously don't like the bloke. Fact is, only he knows if he made that comment and how he meant it.
No he doesn’t. It is far, far more likely that the 3 people on the wrong end of that comment will remember it. Vaughan would deny the London and Moeen comments if they weren’t in print.
 
I was referring to the Moeen tweet. With the alleged comment to Rafiq, there are definitely other possibilities than "Vaughan made this comment, meant it literally and wholeheartedly and is therefore a racist". You will no doubt jump to the most malicious possibility as you obviously don't like the bloke. Fact is, only he knows if he made that comment and how he meant it.
And your opinion? On both topics? Given one was in text format and another has been corroborated?
 
And your opinion? On both topics? Given one was in text format and another has been corroborated?

Moeen comment was ill thought out, can't see how it's racist though tbh.

Alleged comment to Rafiq - I could easily see that being made with jocular intentions and he's put his foot in it. That's the line he should have gone with even if he genuinely doesn't think he made the comment.
 
I was referring to the Moeen tweet. With the alleged comment to Rafiq, there are definitely other possibilities than "Vaughan made this comment, meant it literally and wholeheartedly and is therefore a racist". You will no doubt jump to the most malicious possibility as you obviously don't like the bloke. Fact is, only he knows if he made that comment and how he meant it.
If it was 20 years ago, and even then it would have been evidently wrong with half a brain, there is no nice way of interpreting Vaughan's comments. He has been captain of Yorkshire and England and eas in a position of power, influence and authority. That defence was wibbled out in the eighties. If I had said that to somebody at work at the same time I'd have been sacked. Nothing he says now ameliorates it. He is trying to save his image and broadcasting career and is not motivated by anything else. He might have had a role if he had co-operated with the enquiry and had immediately owned up and asked for examples of his exemplary behaviour and attitudes to be considered (unfortunately his major personal, public engagement is via Twitter and that might have scuppered that). Anyone who apologises to " anyone I might have offended" is automatically denying their actions.
 

Back
Top