• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

ALL NUFC and Sportwashing stuff in here. (Threads will be merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nukehasslefan said:
This isn't about percentages being higher or lower.
If you partake in anything PIF are part of whether it's 00000000000000000.1% or 20%/50%/80% or 100% you're still buying into it.
If you don't buy into any of it and buy into nothing from any country that commit bad/terrible/atrocious acts then you have a stronger argument.


No. It makes them part owners. But you can argue 1005 owners if you wish. It's all still down to percentages.
Arguing a lesser percentage in something keeps morals higher is basically not an argument.

If they feed into them and it is allowed it tars them all, including those who partake in what's on offer by those companies.
Subjective morality.

I don't know what I come over as. All I can do is answer in the manner I think suits.
That answer will not suit those arguing against me, obviously,


If I want to argue the points like you are then I'll argue that I don't care for the regime but I am a Newcastle United fan and supporter of the club.
If that puts me into the bracket of condoning atrocities by people then there's nothing I can do about that. People willd ecide what they decide, regardless.


My morals are subjective like the morals of everyone.
Would you say all your morals are intact with no subjectiveness?
Click to expand...
Didn't over 200% of your alleged 50K biweekly crowds at the landfill beg to be bought by the inhuman Saudi regime?
Wasn't that the whole point of involving MPs, petitions, protests etc etc??
 

keybuk said:
Everybody knows that ownership of clubs in Germany are different to that in the UK. But if you are going to compare apples with pears then carry on.
Click to expand...
It's not about the ownership. He's comparing the response of the fans when scum try and get into their club. How can you be so thick as to think... Oh, hang on. I remember.
 
200 million. Not a bad sum.

Oh, hold on what about the inflated figures asked by other clubs when contacted.

Oh, hold on what about the inflated wages asked for by players agents.

When richest club in the world then that's a given.
 
There's always been something not right about these fuckers. Be brilliant if Biden forced the Eton Mess to reverse the decision. Never happen, but a nice thought, especially after the shameful way the Skunks have gone on
 
The Man The Legend said:
I’ve seen (and owned) the original cover of Days in Europa. I’m not sure I need to know more; how do you explain it?
Click to expand...
I don’t need explain it, Jobson has already done this at the time (which was many years ago) and since.
What we had last night (many years later) was someone wearing a St Pauli shirt, calling Boris J a wanker, criticising the human rights record of the Saudis. So not really much of a right wing sympathiser in any respect.
 
BigPete said:
Loads of them knackers doing it down south one glued his face to the ground.

I'd have pulled his pants down and let a dog bum him.

Punishment fits the crime and he wouldn't do it again.

Just when you thought mags couldn't get worse..

Sportswashed mags and the whataboot brigade comes to town :lol
Click to expand...
Thing is though they’re fooling no one but themselves. The whole world can see them and through them. They’re a f**king disgrace.
Theyve always been attention seekers, well now they’re getting it for all the wrong reasons. The loveable friendly mag supporter. Aye right. Everyone sees them as they really are now. Murderers accomplices and supporters of genocide committed by a medieval regime.
 
Dilligaf60 said:
Thing is though they’re fooling no one but themselves. The whole world can see them and through them. They’re a f**king disgrace.
Theyve always been attention seekers, well now they’re getting it for all the wrong reasons. The loveable friendly mag supporter. Aye right. Everyone sees them as they really are now. Murderers accomplices and supporters of genocide committed by a medieval regime.
Click to expand...

Bunch of gonks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When they don't spend £200m in January thousands of Gravy stained 🐫 🤛ers will be burning flags, shouting at Mosques and chucking tea-towels on the pitch,
It's going to be Hell,
It's going to be Hell,
lock up your 🪨s
It's going to be Hell
 
cluffy said:
You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Aye but there’s clear separation between the PIF and the Saudi government. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 still believe in the Easter bunny. The whole thing is rotten from top to bottom. The fact that Boris has got his dabs all over this should be proof enough it’s bent. And the premier league aren’t exactly paragons of virtue. Jesus, what a f**king mess man.
Thatheaderman said:
200 million. Not a bad sum.

Oh, hold on what about the inflated figures asked by other clubs when contacted.

Oh, hold on what about the inflated wages asked for by players agents.

When richest club in the world then that's a given.
Click to expand...
Assuming someone holds their nose and deals with them ( which they will) the mark up is going to be eye watering
Thatheaderman said:
Yeah. It will come to roost for the Tory bafoon shortly.

US have suspended arms deals with them and asked the bafoon to follow suit. No answer from him yet but soon will be , he wont have a choice.
Click to expand...
I wish I was there to see the fat corrupt bastard squirm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top