Put a flat earthier into space

the tech of the people behind the part of earth off limits is spectacular. I wonder how they select from the general pool of non in the know humans who should be brought into the fold to help their efforts. Must have to do psychological analysis to be sure these smart people can easily be swayed to the lie side or at least easily manipulated.

clever people. Newcastle Fan should apply for a job
And when people retire or die do they have a list of people who have already committed to lie to the public and their families, ready to step in.
 


Now it is not usually accepted that sound and light are different things and they are recorded as travelling at different speeds. So this seems a good one to start with, as it changes a lot about what we think we know.
Of course they're different things to us. But they start out as the very same thing. Energy = force/pressure = vibration/friction (which is sound) = frequency = the light we see.
And there's no speed of light. IMO.
It's instant.

What is "friction of matter" as a moving part of my lightbulb?
Through the filament.
Like water running through a pipe as an analogy. I'm sure this'll be twisted.
Imagine how much attention to detail is required in the CGI department. All them working off the exact same specs. Even including what would match the weather in real life. Top quality work
You only have to look at the floating about in a so called space station to see how they play out CGI.
Imagine they got one coastal inlet or something slightly wrong. the flatties would be all over it. "This doesn't match what's on your Google earth cgi"
They could easily be caught out. Yet the CGI makers are so consistent everywhere they work
You don't think they make films and pass them out as on the spot live, do you?
 
Last edited:
Of course they're different things to us. But they start out as the very same thing. Energy = force/pressure = vibration/friction (which is sound) = frequency = the light we see.
And there's no speed of light. IMO.
It's instant.



Through the filament.
Like water running through a pipe as an analogy. I'm sure this'll be twisted.

You only have to look at the floating about in a so called space station to see how they play out CGI.

You don't think they make films and pass them out as on the spot live, do you?
You still haven't said what is moving in a lightbulb to cause the friction. Also that's assuming it's an old fashioned filament bulb, what about LED ?

That's ignoring the rest of the absolute shite you posted.
 
Last edited:
Of course they're different things to us. But they start out as the very same thing. Energy = force/pressure = vibration/friction (which is sound) = frequency = the light we see.
And there's no speed of light. IMO.
It's instant.



Through the filament.
Like water running through a pipe as an analogy. I'm sure this'll be twisted.

You only have to look at the floating about in a so called space station to see how they play out CGI.

You don't think they make films and pass them out as on the spot live, do you?
Can I just check you intended to type that? “There is no speed of light”. What exactly do you mean by that?
 
You still haven't said what is moving in a lightbulb to cause the friction. Also that's assuming it's an old fashioned filament bulb, what about LED ?

That's ignoring the rest of the absolute shite you posted.
I'm sure you don't want answers from me.
Can I just check you intended to type that? “There is no speed of light”. What exactly do you mean by that?
Exactly what it says.
Light has no speed. It's instant.
 
I'm sure you don't want answers from me.

Exactly what it says.
Light has no speed. It's instant.
Didn’t you say that light needs a medium to travel through which is why we should not be able to see stars going through the near vacuum of space many lightyears away? Surely anything travelling has a speed?
 
Since the great one has everyone bar about 2 on ignore now am I right in thinking we have literally thousands of scientists working pretending the earth is a globe then we must have thousands of “real” scientists doing everything in the background doing all the proper science stuff on this flat, not flat, ice dome lemon squeezer thing🤷‍♂️
 
Didn’t you say that light needs a medium to travel through which is why we should not be able to see stars going through the near vacuum of space many lightyears away? Surely anything travelling has a speed?
Nothing moves without connectivity. That means all matter must be attached. No free space, which means no vacuum or scattered particles in a so called free space.

Light is the product of what shows it to our eyes/vision, which is the friction of matter and what we see of that friction of matter is instant, not a speed.
The sound from it can be classed as a speed to our ears from the source.

The speed of light is not a thing. In my opinion of course.
 
Since the great one has everyone bar about 2 on ignore now am I right in thinking we have literally thousands of scientists working pretending the earth is a globe then we must have thousands of “real” scientists doing everything in the background doing all the proper science stuff on this flat, not flat, ice dome lemon squeezer thing🤷‍♂️
the fake industry will have vastly more people working in it. they'll need stuff like metal detectors at airports and Sports Direct to make sure people aren't removing tech for a start
 
Nothing moves without connectivity. That means all matter must be attached. No free space, which means no vacuum or scattered particles in a so called free space.

Light is the product of what shows it to our eyes/vision, which is the friction of matter and what we see of that friction of matter is instant, not a speed.
The sound from it can be classed as a speed to our ears from the source.

The speed of light is not a thing. In my opinion of course.
🤪🤪🤪🤪😂😂😂😂😂🤷‍♂️🤯🤯🤯
 
Nothing moves without connectivity. That means all matter must be attached. No free space, which means no vacuum or scattered particles in a so called free space.

Light is the product of what shows it to our eyes/vision, which is the friction of matter and what we see of that friction of matter is instant, not a speed.
The sound from it can be classed as a speed to our ears from the source.

The speed of light is not a thing. In my opinion of course.

If we were to get a glass bell jar and create a vacuum (as much as is possible), then shine a light through the side of the jar, the absence of matter inside would mean the light can’t be seen in the other side. Assuming your theory is correct.
 
If we were to get a glass bell jar and create a vacuum (as much as is possible), then shine a light through the side of the jar, the absence of matter inside would mean the light can’t be seen in the other side. Assuming your theory is correct.
I was gonna post similar but I'm on ignore I'm sure
 
If we were to get a glass bell jar and create a vacuum (as much as is possible), then shine a light through the side of the jar, the absence of matter inside would mean the light can’t be seen in the other side. Assuming your theory is correct.
A bell jar can only evacuate so much of what's inside via a pump.
The jar is still crammed full of matter it's just much less dense matter, meaning the matter is broken down and expanded.

Seeing light through this would never be any issue.
A true vacuum would mean the end of existence for everything.
 
Nothing moves without connectivity. That means all matter must be attached. No free space, which means no vacuum or scattered particles in a so called free space.

Light is the product of what shows it to our eyes/vision, which is the friction of matter and what we see of that friction of matter is instant, not a speed.
The sound from it can be classed as a speed to our ears from the source.

The speed of light is not a thing. In my opinion of course.
So is there such a thing as the speed of sound?
 

Back
Top