Put a flat earthier into space

It's already in the trough.
That's what I'm trying to tell you.


Why would people know this would be the potential Earth when they think they're navigating on a globe that's spinning?
Think about it.

You'll hit any land that's in the way of your navigation.
If you go east or west you're going around a circle.
If you go north you hit land from any point you start from going north.
South is the opposite. You will hit land and ice barriers well before you get to any real land gradient either way, north and south as people see it on a compass.
See, the problem is that's just not factually true. There are latitudes in the southern hemisphere at which there is no land no matter how far east or west you sail or fly.

There's only one way you can be able to "go around a circle" of the same distance in the northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere by going east or west at a constant latitude. I'll leave you to contemplate what that is.
 


See, the problem is that's just not factually true. There are latitudes in the southern hemisphere at which there is no land no matter how far east or west you sail or fly.

There's only one way you can be able to "go around a circle" of the same distance in the northern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere by going east or west at a constant latitude. I'll leave you to contemplate what that is.
You're going to have to elaborate on this just so we're clear.
 
I would imagine water has many different elevations but each body of water will be flat and level inside the container/indentation it is within.
There's no water on any slope as a level unless it is in an indentation upon the slope.
Any water on an actual slope would be flowing without a containment.


Your spinning globe offers nothing of that sort.
I'm asking you to explain it on the map you posted showing how your world looks.
The difference in level between the 2 dots.
Still waiting.
 
You're going to have to elaborate on this just so we're clear.
Please present a model of a world in which the distance around the world at 45 degrees south latitude is the same as at 45 north latitude (or any other number) or prove that the distances are different.

Or put otherwise: on a flat earth, what's at the center of the map, if east-west is a trip around the circle?
 
Last edited:
I explained it a little bit back. I'll find it and you can go to it.
#2,456
Nah I read that. It doesn't work on the map you posted reflecting what your world/cell looks like.
Have a look at what you posted again and look where the seas are, all interconnected by the way so all will fall to lowest point.
Lakes etc will be held inside landmasses etc.
 
I explained it a little bit back. I'll find it and you can go to it.
#2,456
It might help if you provided a cross section sketch of the thousands of miles of Alantic. I don’t think anyone thought your explanation made any sense.

Yes you walk down a slope from the beach into the ocean and that gets deeper as you go, because gravity is holding that water to the surface of a globe. That is the force holding it ‘in’.

You reject that, fair enough. You can say the earth is flat and the oceans are a giant puddle making a container with defined edges and a flat surface. So many things don’t work with that, but it does hold water.

You however claim some sort of central hemisphere where the atlantic ocean sticks to a slope by some unknown method very similar to gravity. If there are intentions holding the water back, then the only way to achieve this is having it stepped. We know the atlantic is not stepped with edges a ship would hit, so how.

This is the major problem with your world. You have taken a hemisphere and replaced it with a hemisphere where all the things you rejected for a globe that would make at least the middle bit work, you have already rejected.

Can you sketch for us how water sticks to your slope. Call it a gradient if you like. A gradient is still a slope. A diagram would help.
 
It might help if you provided a cross section sketch of the thousands of miles of Alantic. I don’t think anyone thought your explanation made any sense.

Yes you walk down a slope from the beach into the ocean and that gets deeper as you go, because gravity is holding that water to the surface of a globe. That is the force holding it ‘in’.

You reject that, fair enough. You can say the earth is flat and the oceans are a giant puddle making a container with defined edges and a flat surface. So many things don’t work with that, but it does hold water.

You however claim some sort of central hemisphere where the atlantic ocean sticks to a slope by some unknown method very similar to gravity. If there are intentions holding the water back, then the only way to achieve this is having it stepped. We know the atlantic is not stepped with edges a ship would hit, so how.

This is the major problem with your world. You have taken a hemisphere and replaced it with a hemisphere where all the things you rejected for a globe that would make at least the middle bit work, you have already rejected.

Can you sketch for us how water sticks to your slope. Call it a gradient if you like. A gradient is still a slope. A diagram would help.
I've tried that mate, even drew my own sections based on his own map.
He has no answer.
I even put 2 dots on different parts of the same sea on HIS map.
Can't wait for the response, probably in his bath now with his trunks on trying to work it out. 😂😂
 
Please present a model of a world in which the distance around the world at 45 degrees south latitude is the same as at 45 north latitude (or any other number) or prove that the distances are different.

Or put otherwise: on a flat earth, what's at the center of the map, if east-west is a trip around the circle?
I've already explained it.
It might help if you provided a cross section sketch of the thousands of miles of Alantic. I don’t think anyone thought your explanation made any sense.

Yes you walk down a slope from the beach into the ocean and that gets deeper as you go, because gravity is holding that water to the surface of a globe. That is the force holding it ‘in’.

You reject that, fair enough. You can say the earth is flat and the oceans are a giant puddle making a container with defined edges and a flat surface. So many things don’t work with that, but it does hold water.

You however claim some sort of central hemisphere where the atlantic ocean sticks to a slope by some unknown method very similar to gravity.
In bold.
No I don't.
I've tried to explain it but you're not looking at it in the way I'm describing.

If there are intentions holding the water back, then the only way to achieve this is having it stepped. We know the atlantic is not stepped with edges a ship would hit, so how.

Nope.
Indentations on land. Lakes and what not.
Large oceans run to land not slope off land but slopes to land.
Think about it.
This is the major problem with your world.

There's no problem.
You have taken a hemisphere and replaced it with a hemisphere where all the things you rejected for a globe that would make at least the middle bit work, you have already rejected.
If you want to look at it like a hemisphere then fine but the difference is, the oceans go up the hemisphere from the bowl. Your global set up cannot offer that as it's a spinning ball that somehow uses magical mysterious gravity explanations in order to hold oceans on it.

And to think I'm creating puzzlement with mine.
Can you sketch for us how water sticks to your slope. Call it a gradient if you like. A gradient is still a slope. A diagram would help.
I don't need to sketch. Just understand how water goes up a bowl or a concavity.
Your issue is in thinking water on the convex looking centre just rests on it. It rises with the water in the actual bowl.
You're just looking at a small diagram and thinking of a big hump and land masses on that big hump with water at that height.

This is balanced out over massive distance and a very very gradual gradient.
 
Last edited:
I've already explained it.
Not in a way that comports with observed facts of aerial or oceanic navigation. That's the point. So try again: just post a map of your world, that's all. I don't care about a 3-D aspect. Just a map. Shouldn't be hard if the earth is flat.
 
Last edited:
It might help if you provided a cross section sketch of the thousands of miles of Alantic. I don’t think anyone thought your explanation made any sense.

Yes you walk down a slope from the beach into the ocean and that gets deeper as you go, because gravity is holding that water to the surface of a globe. That is the force holding it ‘in’.

You reject that, fair enough. You can say the earth is flat and the oceans are a giant puddle making a container with defined edges and a flat surface. So many things don’t work with that, but it does hold water.

You however claim some sort of central hemisphere where the atlantic ocean sticks to a slope by some unknown method very similar to gravity. If there are intentions holding the water back, then the only way to achieve this is having it stepped. We know the atlantic is not stepped with edges a ship would hit, so how.

This is the major problem with your world. You have taken a hemisphere and replaced it with a hemisphere where all the things you rejected for a globe that would make at least the middle bit work, you have already rejected.

Can you sketch for us how water sticks to your slope. Call it a gradient if you like. A gradient is still a slope. A diagram would help.

no evidence is required from the smartest man alive. Take his supreme word as gospel.
 
I don't need to sketch. Just understand how water goes up a bowl or a concavity.
Your issue is in thinking water on the convex looking centre just rests on it. It rises with the water in the actual bowl.
You're just looking at a small diagram and thinking of a big hump and land masses on that big hump with water at that height.
Using your logic on YOUR map all of this below the red dot would be submerged?
As it rises up the convex in the actual bowl......
Including up the outer rim btw in case you get confused.

Not in a way that comports with observed facts of aerial or oceanic navigation. That's the point. So try again: just post a map of your world, that's all. I don't care about a 3-D aspect. Just a map. Shouldn't be hard if the earth is flat.
He posted one. I've coloured in part of it to try and work out how seas stay at a high level in the middle. He said this map was how his world looks
 
Last edited:
I've already explained it.

In bold.
No I don't.
I've tried to explain it but you're not looking at it in the way I'm describing.



Nope.
Indentations on land. Lakes and what not.
Large oceans run to land not slope off land but slopes to land.
Think about it.


There's no problem.

If you want to look at it like a hemisphere then fine but the difference is, the oceans go up the hemisphere from the bowl. Your global set up cannot offer that as it's a spinning ball that somehow uses magical mysterious gravity explanations in order to hold oceans on it.

And to think I'm creating puzzlement with mine.

I don't need to sketch. Just understand how water goes up a bowl or a concavity.
Your issue is in thinking water on the convex looking centre just rests on it. It rises with the water in the actual bowl.
You're just looking at a small diagram and thinking of a big hump and land masses on that big hump with water at that height.

This is balanced out over massive distance and a very very gradual gradient.
Indentations does not explain why water sticks to a slope.

You may not need a diagram, but I think we do. Your explanations seem like a random string of words thrown together.
 
Not in a way that comports with observed facts of aerial or oceanic navigation. That's the point. So try again: just post a map of your world, that's all. I don't care about a 3-D aspect. Just a map. Shouldn't be hard if the earth is flat.
Easy way to debunk this flat earth. Very easy. Get in a plane on the equator. Fly it exactly on the equator east or west. After a long enough time you arrive at the same point.

Some mad bastards walk amongst us.
 
Indentations does not explain why water sticks to a slope.

You may not need a diagram, but I think we do. Your explanations seem like a random string of words thrown together.

Are you implying that :-

Nope.
Indentations on land. Lakes and what not.
Large oceans run to land not slope off land but slopes to land.
Think about it.

Doesn't make sense? I mean could it be explained any clearer than the bit I have highlighted in bold.
 
Are you implying that :-

Nope.
Indentations on land. Lakes and what not.
Large oceans run to land not slope off land but slopes to land.
Think about it.

Doesn't make sense? I mean could it be explained any clearer than the bit I have highlighted in bold.
If you fill a bowl with water does the water run up the bowl or down the bowl?
 

Back
Top