Twisted
Striker
Somewhat bemused to see Clark not given an opportunity yet Coughlin is selected
Vindicated?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Somewhat bemused to see Clark not given an opportunity yet Coughlin is selected
Credit where it's due but I'm just not sure why he's in for if we are going on merit/performances (that said he's on a 3 year deal). Mind you it's a good chance for some bowlers to make a point here as Glamorgan are just here to play one day mode. I'd have still had Clark in the sideVindicated?![]()
Took him ages mind and for that reason I don't believe he was 100% sureAnd Pratt gets his finger out.
Credit where it's due but I'm just not sure why he's in for if we are going on merit/performances (that said he's on a 3 year deal). Mind you it's a good chance for some bowlers to make a point here as Glamorgan are just here to play one day mode. I'd have still had Clark in the side
Well this one wont go to Wednesday.
86/8
Yup. Mind you Glamorgan are a bit poor and a bit in one day mode. 9 down here.Agree entirely, just love a reverse commentators curse
And another!Agree entirely, just love a reverse commentators curse
Depends on how Durham bat might not even make it till after work the morra![]()
Yup. Mind you Glamorgan are a bit poor and a bit in one day mode. 9 down here.
For anyone interested you can redeem the Surrey game free drink and sarnie voucher for this game as well...but you have a long wait in the members bar as the usual outlet behind the new scoreboard isn't open.
You can even get a hot pork sarnie today !Good to know! And by chance I have them with, although they just say Game TBC on them.
You can even get a hot pork sarnie today !
Hard to think that Glam were 60-1 at 11.15 this morning.
Bad miss by Potts.
Not that it matters.
Somewhat bemused to see Clark not given an opportunity yet Coughlin is selected. Handful of us in the county Durham upper.
Also nice to see the opposition make the effort to travel and fulfill a fixture.
Credit where it's due but I'm just not sure why he's in for if we are going on merit/performances (that said he's on a 3 year deal). Mind you it's a good chance for some bowlers to make a point here as Glamorgan are just here to play one day mode. I'd have still had Clark in the side
I'm just not sure what Coughlin has done though, even to be ahead of Salisbury (who took 7 wickets in the seconds whilst Coughlin took 2). Few questions about the starting 11 given it all means nowt and this game here I'm struggling to take seriously. We aren't the biggest squad and I think we don't have the luxury of solely basing performances with white ball but I'm a tad bemused. Suppose we have to justify a 3 year contract. I'd like to think Campbell got a go at some point earlier, he took 3 wickets last game. As for Jones,.my thoughts are crystal clear as they have been for a good whileSurely you’re not comparing the selection of a bowler to a batsman…?
If you talk about merit - Clark failed in his last opportunity in red ball cricket (whilst Jones excelled). Clearly there was only one space up for grabs and they’ve gone with Jones. Can’t argue with the decision at all. White ball cricket and red ball cricket are so very different.
Glamorgan turned up for a whack.Not at the game today, but wondering if teams can be arsed at this time of the season with nothing to play for.
Yup because their is nowt to play for. I think Gloucester were about 80 all out.Some atrocious scores around the country today.![]()
Difficult to read anything into this. I'm not taking much of it seriously.Durham turning into a really canny 4 day side