• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

NUFC July 2021.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Roker Mackem said:
12th last season🤣


12th last season🤣
Click to expand...

And personally I think the promoted 3 are weaker than the relegated 3 with a number of other teams in a state of flux. Piece of piss for Agent Bruce to keep them up this season no wonder comrade Mike is not splashing the cash.
 
jlaws said:
And personally I think the promoted 3 are weaker than the relegated 3 with a number of other teams in a state of flux. Piece of piss for Agent Bruce to keep them up this season no wonder comrade Mike is not splashing the cash.
Click to expand...
At the moment they have both Wilson and St Maximum available .At the moment !!!!
 
Qwerty said:
We criticise the mags for thinking they're better than they are so criticising them because they think they're shit makes us look like nuggets.
Plenty of things to pull the piss out of the mags for but that table isn't one of them.
Click to expand...
Qwerty said:
Delusion is thinking you're better than you are. That table shows the opposite.
Plenty legitimate reasons to criticise the mags, this isn't one of them.
Click to expand...
The delusion isn't them thinking they're a better team than they have, it's that they think they should be up there at the top as they once nearly won the league and seasons in Europe. They say they have a shit team as it hasn't got the likes of the players they had in the 90's as they were spoilt with big spending. They will also be comparing this shit team to what they thought they may get if they had the takeover. They struggled with ASM and Wilson missing at times last season but still finished best of the bottom teams but it's not good enough for them as summit like 86% (I think I saw this somewhere recently) want the Saudis in as they think they will spend big again.

They're just feeling sorry for themselves and being pessimistic about it all, mainly in part to the delusion they should be a top half team. Yet in reality, as history shows, before they spent big in the 90's they were an average mid to lower league team with the odd relegations hoyed in.

On a side note, the survey didn't ask 10,000's of fans from each club as it's just over 1,000 Premier League fans (
You must be logged on to see external links
) so just over 50 per club on average. A quick calculation shows that the 3.94% is either 3 in 76 fans or 5 in 127 fans so not a huge reflection of the 55,000 screaming geordies. The Mags were 3.71% last year so they've gone up to 3.94% so Bruce did well :lol:

To cut a long boring post short, the survey asking a handful of supporters of each club isn't the true reflection of the many 1,000's of fans anyway. Though no survey is needed to know a certain percentage of the Mags are deluded due to the brief and costly spell in the 90's they tasted decent football spoiling them :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MackemX said:
The delusion isn't them thinking they're a better team than they have, it's that they think they should be up there at the top as they once nearly won the league and seasons in Europe. They say they have a shit team as it hasn't got the likes of the players they had in the 90's as they were spoilt with big spending. They will also be comparing this shit team to what they thought they may get if they had the takeover. They struggled with ASM and Wilson missing at times last season but still finished best of the bottom teams but it's not good enough for them as summit like 86% (I think I saw this somewhere recently) want the Saudis in as they think they will spend big again.

They're just feeling sorry for themselves and being pessimistic about it all, mainly in part to the delusion they should be a top half team. Yet in reality, as history shows, before they spent big in the 90's they were an average mid to lower league team with the odd relegations hoyed in.

On a side note, the survey didn't ask 10,000's of fans from each club as it's just over 1,000 Premier League fans (
You must be logged on to see external links
) so just over 50 per club on average. A quick calculation shows that the 3.94% is either 3 in 76 fans or 5 in 127 fans so not a huge reflection of the 55,000 screaming geordies. The Mags were 3.71% last year so they've gone up to 3.94% so Bruce did well :lol:

To cut a long boring post short, the survey asking a handful of supporters of each club isn't the true reflection of the many 1,000's of fans anyway. Though no survey is needed to know a certain percentage of the Mags are deluded due to the brief and costly spell in the 90's they tasted decent football spoiling them :lol:
Click to expand...

There are mags I know that would be happy to see them relegated just so they can aim some hatred at Bruce and Ashley.

They are never happy. Even mid table under Pardew lead to mass protests.
 
Anth9ftm said:
Love it. ‘Bring your flags, banners and voices to the players entrance at 12pm’

so they’re going to shout at the players now?
Click to expand...
Be the usual 20/30 suspects, one dressed in why aye man underpants, one with a shovel, three with sports direct bags and four with gravy on their Blue star 1992 (retro) shirt two with actual hair on their heids, one vicar, 4 banners (one with a spelling error) two dogs, and 20 virgins
 
Wearside Wanderer II said:
Be the usual 20/30 suspects, one dressed in why aye man underpants, one with a shovel, three with sports direct bags and four with gravy on their Blue star 1992 (retro) shirt two with actual hair on their heids, one vicar, 4 banners (one with a spelling error) two dogs, and 20 virgins
Click to expand...
The Saudis might turn up if there are virgins there. Massive Toon fans
You must be logged on to see external links

Another Rafa flop. Read the comments man. Blaming everyone but Bouncy. f***ing Cult
 
Last edited:
Wansbeck Viking said:
There are mags I know that would be happy to see them relegated just so they can aim some hatred at Bruce and Ashley.

They are never happy. Even mid table under Pardew lead to mass protests.
Click to expand...
Pardew's form was probably worse than Bruces was when you hounded him out. Let's not rewrite history here. Pardew headbutted a player, he called another manager an old **** on the sidelines. The bloke was an absolute f***ing nightmare.
 
mag in peace said:
Pardew's form was probably worse than Bruces was when you hounded him out. Let's not rewrite history here. Pardew headbutted a player, he called another manager an old **** on the sidelines. The bloke was an absolute f***ing nightmare.
Click to expand...

He took over from hughton half way through the season. Immediately lost Carroll yet improved on Hughton’s form anyway and finished 11th.

Then he won the manager of the year award and finished 5th, then 16th, then 10th, and you were top half when he walked out on you halfway through the season.

As soon as he walked you plummeted to the bottom of the league and nearly got relegated, only staying up on the last day. Then you actually did go down the following season. You’ve never hit those heights since.

Pardew’s 4 years was your best spell in the last 15 years, and was one of your better spells of the last century. The fact that you screamed and pissed yourselves like bairns throughout the entire thing is of no consequence. Let’s not rewrite history.
 
mag in peace said:
Pardew's form was probably worse than Bruces was when you hounded him out. Let's not rewrite history here. Pardew headbutted a player, he called another manager an old **** on the sidelines. The bloke was an absolute f***ing nightmare.
Click to expand...

So when you had a mass protest against him when you finished 10th, was it about his behaviour?

We turned on Bruce when we got beat off Wigan who were bottom of the league and put us in the relegation zone in November/December time. You turned on Pardew on the last game of the season when you finished 10th. Totally different scenarios.
 
Skellington said:
He took over from hughton half way through the season. Immediately lost Carroll yet improved on Hughton’s form anyway and finished 11th.

Then he won the manager of the year award and finished 5th, then 16th, then 10th, and you were top half when he walked out on you halfway through the season.

As soon as he walked you plummeted to the bottom of the league and nearly got relegated, only staying up on the last day. Then you actually did go down the following season. You’ve never hit those heights since.

Pardew’s 4 years was your best spell in the last 15 years, and was one of your better spells of the last century. The fact that you screamed and pissed yourselves like bairns throughout the entire thing is of no consequence. Let’s not rewrite history.
Click to expand...

it's because he always lost against us
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top