Fujitsu consistently put up their own expert, who said that without a shadow of a doubt the software was fine.it may be that they thought this magic software was doing the business and catching the so called dodgy ones out.
not everybody was accused though, so I wonder the reasons why some were singled out and others were not. whether it being the postmaster or an assistant.
as usual where money is concerned there will always be somebody tempted to slip a £20 in their pocket and it gets out of hand.
I am puzzled as to what made the money go missing, how was it shown to have been paid in and how did it disappear or was just that it just appeared to disappear.
As every case went through the courts and police, I can only think some rather big assumptions were made at some point.
was it a case a trial was heard and a judge ruled that the software could be trusted.
rather like the judge ruling that DNA could be used as evidence
Despite known bugs which caused the issues seen, being identified several years previously.