Sorry like, but in an effort to play down Benitez' ability (purely because Newcastle fans rate him, by the way), you're saying that statistically, anecdotally worse football is the same as it was under RB? I've shown that the points don't tell the full story.
We were so lucky (something you read a lot on here) last season. So many games where we'd played badly and somehow, against all logic, have nicked a point or better. The Everton game for example. They were much, much better than us and should have been home and dry with a comfortable 2-0 win, but bizarrely we equalise in the final minutes of the match. That gave us a point, which you're saying is exactly the same as a well-organised, well drilled, hard won point under Benitez against Man City (or whomever). That's revisionist bollocks. You're deliberately twisting reality to fit your prejudice.
Bruce is shit, and much much worse than all but one or two of the Newcastle managers I've endured in nearly 40yrs on this planet. If we're relegated (which is possible), he'll go down as the worst. He just turned up at the worst team in Premier League history, played a passive low block and allowed a winless Sheffield United to play their way confidently to a deserved win. But, sure, he's as bad as Benitez because, reasons.