• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover News/Rumours - Part 42

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seems to be a few suggestions by other posters that it might be to do with SpD and Poyet not having total control.
Cheers mate. It’s been common knowledge though so not sure why it would scupper it so late in the dat. Unless of course he found out who and wasn’t impressed
 
Tend to agree with that. Some people were analysing every tweet looking for coded messages. I don't think our Social Media team are that bright............
When they make a typo they are “thick as whale spunk”; when they have the word “Back” in bold then they are sending us coded messages about the new manager
 
Hank they are almost certainly staying on in a vain attempt to recuperate their losses. I’m not sure how many millions Donald is in the red on Sunderland but selling now would crystallise his losses.

If he can get the cost base to a point the club is not losing money he can then take an annual dividend which is probably more than the interest his original capital outlay would have received in the bank.

The “take over” seems to be a mechanism to get extra working capital into the business because it continues to lose money and no other financing options are available but to dilute his ownership. That or administration and lose the lot.

Honesty, thinking pragmatically about it this is what is happening. It is not a takeover and plenty of people at close hand have said as much.
With the damage caused by Donald and methven its just not going to be anywhere being close to acceptable if they retain any kind of ownership. The club will only be able to truly move on once they have gone.

And I suspect their presence will have a shocking impact on attendances.

We need clean break and a fresh start.
 
With the damage caused by Donald and methven its just not going to be anywhere being close to acceptable if they retain any kind of ownership. The club will only be able to truly move on once they have gone.

And I suspect their presence will have a shocking impact on attendances.

We need clean break and a fresh start.

I agree about a fresh start mate. Although CM and SD will be minority shareholders, people will have doubts about their involvement.
 
With the damage caused by Donald and methven its just not going to be anywhere being close to acceptable if they retain any kind of ownership. The club will only be able to truly move on once they have gone.

And I suspect their presence will have a shocking impact on attendances.

We need clean break and a fresh start.
So the PR machine will create the impression that they have relinquished control and are now silent partners.

It is up to us and time will tell to see if that is believable.
 
Let's be honest, dreyfus and a sporting director probably don't have a clue who Cowley is. If he gets the job its proof that the same fools are running the show.

Takeover is being over-egged massively once again
Be Rodwell saying that his mate Cowley is a top quality manager etc, pushing it onto them and so forth.
 
Let's be honest, dreyfus and a sporting director probably don't have a clue who Cowley is. If he gets the job its proof that the same fools are running the show.

Takeover is being over-egged massively once again

I wouldn't be too convinced by Cowley, but not sure how you came to that conclusion. Surely this is the point of CVs, interviews and references? I'd rather we got the manager who performed best in the recruitment process, not just someone who the new owner knows.
 
I wouldn't be too convinced by Cowley, but not sure how you came to that conclusion. Surely this is the point of CVs, interviews and references? I'd rather we got the manager who performed best in the recruitment process, not just someone who the new owner knows.
Whos to say Cowley isn't being hired because he knows rodwell by that logic?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top