Takeover News/Rumours

[joedurham]

Double bluff by Ted

Hastings is not "H"

 

[6inarow]

Hasnt tweeted for a couple of days

You must be logged on to see media items

 

[Papa Smurf]

Hasnt tweeted for a couple of days

You must be logged on to see media items

Was willing to give the bloke a chance but sticking up for Parky now.......I’m out, bloke is clearly not all there!

 

[wigwams]

Really don't see the point in this needing to be done as soon as. Nothing can or will be done about what happens on the pitch now.

 

[Sbarcher]

Don’t shoot the messenger, just repeating what I heard last night. Bob Murray is involved with a consortium to take over the club but SD still wants overall control. May be BS but discussions on-going with Neil Fox. ( from a member of the consortium).

 

[qixman]

Don’t shoot the messenger, just repeating what I heard last night. Bob Murray is involved with a consortium to take over the club but SD still wants overall control. May be BS but discussions on-going with Neil Fox. ( from a member of the consortium).

From who? SD has publicly stated he wants out so why would he still want to have overall control?

 

[sick]

Really don't see the point in this needing to be done as soon as. Nothing can or will be done about what happens on the pitch now.

Could change the manager.

 

[Papa Smurf]

Really don't see the point in this needing to be done as soon as. Nothing can or will be done about what happens on the pitch now.

So they can’t sack the manager? Honestly don’t get those on here stating even if we have new owners there’s no point in getting rid of Parkinson at this stage etc. The bloke is an abortion of a manager and needs gone ASAP.

 

[Scorer]

Don’t shoot the messenger, just repeating what I heard last night. Bob Murray is involved with a consortium to take over the club but SD still wants overall control. May be BS but discussions on-going with Neil Fox. ( from a member of the consortium).

Can’t see that happening but I’d welcome him back with open arms, if we aren’t getting a big money owner then Murray would be the next best thing.

 

[Roger]

Don’t shoot the messenger, just repeating what I heard last night. Bob Murray is involved with a consortium to take over the club but SD still wants overall control. May be BS but discussions on-going with Neil Fox. ( from a member of the consortium).

Just to point out - there is a huge difference between Bob Murray being "involved" with a consortium and being part of a consortium.

It would make sense for interested parties to consult with previous owners of the club, but this doesn't mean they are part of the takeover in any way.

 

[Sbarcher]

From who? SD has publicly stated he wants out so why would he still want to have overall control?

Actually was TOLD. SD still wants to be major shareholder but not actively involved.

 

[Roker Mackem]

Actually was TOLD. SD still wants to be major shareholder but not actively involved.

Wont happen. Sack your source.

 

[Secret Visage]

Just to point out - there is a huge difference between Bob Murray being "involved" with a consortium and being part of a consortium.

It would make sense for interested parties to consult with previous owners of the club, but this doesn't mean they are part of the takeover in any way.

Bob was sounded out by another party, prior to SD buying from Short.

 

[Sbarcher]

Just to point out - there is a huge difference between Bob Murray being "involved" with a consortium and being part of a consortium.

It would make sense for interested parties to consult with previous owners of the club, but this doesn't mean they are part of the takeover in any way.

He is part of a 3 man group.

 

[Mary Hinge]

He is part of a 3 man group.

He never had the money the last time and ran it like a corner shop......

 

[Deleted member 11942]

SD does NOT still want overall control, he actively wants out

 

[rubberface]

Can someone direct me to one single post where any of the itk’s have actually stated anything apart from the obvious? I just want guidance on whether I should bother checking the thread ever again

Dinnit bother then. See ya.

 

[MikeSAFC]

He never had the money the last time and ran it like a corner shop......

It was a better corner shop than this one

 

[rubberface]

Don’t shoot the messenger, just repeating what I heard last night. Bob Murray is involved with a consortium to take over the club but SD still wants overall control. May be BS but discussions on-going with Neil Fox. ( from a member of the consortium).

Bob Murray will never ever get involved with Sunderland again. Fact.

From who? SD has publicly stated he wants out so why would he still want to have overall control?

What he is saying publically is so far from the truth.

Just to point out - there is a huge difference between Bob Murray being "involved" with a consortium and being part of a consortium.

It would make sense for interested parties to consult with previous owners of the club, but this doesn't mean they are part of the takeover in any way.

...hece why the pair from Dubai want MG as head of talks for them. Cos he knows the.club and area and are mates with him and trust him. He's not involved financially as i've already stated tho but Donald still acting the twat. He just can't let go.

 

[Mary Hinge]

It was a better corner shop than this one

Wasn't man, another golden opportunity to push on and shit his pants.....