pwsafc
Striker
Yes but you can't sponsor a motor racing team with £581They had £581 in the bank at the time of the last accounts. It's a matter of public record.
You must be logged on to see external links
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes but you can't sponsor a motor racing team with £581They had £581 in the bank at the time of the last accounts. It's a matter of public record.
You must be logged on to see external links
Yes but you can't sponsor a motor racing team with £581
You said he had £581 showing in his last accounts. But it's obvious he must have more than that, and the company must have more than that or they wouldn't be anywhere near motorsports.I didn't say he did.
All of this, plus the fact Donald and Methven took almost everyone in by saying the right things, yet people still come out and say he came across well or maybe we need to give him a chance. We should be making sure the cretin is nowhere near the club.1. Rich Energy's bank balance is £581. (No figures missed off).
2. Rich Energy haven't filed any accounts - even though they are overdue - since 2018.
3. It is impossible to purchase Rich Energy in any shop that I have ever been in.
4. An F1 team went into administration when he was claiming to be interested in buying them because they knew he wasn't credible.
5. When he went to court for stealing the logo of Whyte Bikes, the judge found that he was dishonest- her comments are worth repeating as he seems to have pulled the same stunt on our fans here:
"I found both Mr Storey and Mr Kelly [Storey's friend and logo designer] to be poor witnesses. Mr Storey provided different and inconsistent accounts of the development of [the Rich Energy logo], which also conflicted to a large extent with the evidence of Mr Kelly. He often did not answer questions directly, preferring to make speeches about his vision for his business or alternatively seeking to evade questions by speaking in generalities or in the third person plural. He only answered several questions when I intervened. He had a tendency to make impressive statements, which on further investigation or consideration were not quite what they seemed."
6. He claimed in court that he had sold 90 million cans of his drink. He changed that to three million.
7. He sponsored an F1 team then fell out with the owners of the team, and the other shareholders in his own company.
This in itself should be a red flag.You said he had £581 showing in his last accounts. But it's obvious he must have more than that, and the company must have more than that or they wouldn't be anywhere near motorsports.
You said he had £581 showing in his last accounts. But it's obvious he must have more than that, and the company must have more than that or they wouldn't be anywhere near motorsports.
All of this, plus the fact Donald and Methven took almost everyone in by saying the right things, yet people still come out and say he came across well or maybe we need to give him a chance. We should be making sure the cretin is nowhere near the club.
This in itself should be a red flag.
I didn't ask for facts! Not really sure what getting all defensive for. Just saying it's obvious rich energy have more money than that, as they are spo sorting superbikes and motor racing.In response to a post acting for facts, I said that Rich Energy had £581 in the bank as at the last accounts.
You said "Have no idea about him butbri h (sic) energy will have a lot more than £581 or they wouldn't be sponsoring motor racing and superbikes"
So I gave you the link which showed that Rich Energy had £581 in the bank as at the last accounts. You can get into whatever speculation you want about how he funds F1 sponsorship, I was asked for facts and provided one.
To be fair, I turn up to meetings in a suit, and I am sure this guy is much more successful than me and millions of others like me. For all he is a bit of a Kernt, Branson has done ok for himself by not following "standard" protocol. Not saying this guy will be any good, but its a bit of a dated mindset to thing you need a suit and tie to do business. you want to see what the fuckers wear in our Stockholm office, and its what they consider to be "business casual"!Who turns up for a meeting to buy a club, in a replica shirt, pushes the photo out on social, and then does a radio interview, slagging people off? He's a publicity hound. This is all about him, not us. He'll be a nightmare for us, and we should avoid him a all costs.
I didn't ask for facts! Not really sure what getting all defensive for. Just saying it's obvious rich energy have more money than that, as they are spo sorting superbikes and motor racing.
All of this, plus the fact Donald and Methven took almost everyone in by saying the right things, yet people still come out and say he came across well or maybe we need to give him a chance. We should be making sure the cretin is nowhere near the club.
This in itself should be a red flag.
Not really bothered if you don't read my posts, I was just making the point ( not challenging) that you can't become a sponsor with £581 so the company must have more money from somewhereI wasn't responding to you, though, when I mentioned the £581 they had in the bank (I tend to be fairly selective these days whose posts I read so I don't often read yours, I'm afraid). It was you that started challenging what I had written. You can deal in what is 'obvious' to you, I will go off what their accounts say on this one, thanks.
Where?Not really bothered if you don't read my posts, I was just making the point ( not challenging) that you can't become a sponsor with £581 so the company must have more money from somewhere
Ask storey, but you wouldn't be alloeed anywhere near superbikes with £581. It will cost more than that to out his his logos on the bikesWhere?