People lost to conspiracy theories

MackemX said:
You realise they could fire it beforehand so it hits the reflector? Probably why send pulses as one is bound to hit it.

Again explaining the basics :lol:
Click to expand...
Aye, fire it beforehand to a tiny little reflector and hope it hits, eh?
The same thing applies as it does hit, if that was the case. By the time it hit it would've moved away from it and hit the surface.
It's a fantasy story sold to the public, imo.
 


Nebula said:
The saddest thing I find about them is the strong and confident belief that they have stumbled upon the truth while the rest of us are mere sheep. They'll go round and round in circles complaining about people who disagree with their politics being beholden to the "MAINSTREAM MEDIA" yet the only people they agree with are those who consume the same Youtube channels and social media accounts and are therefore in on the truth.
Click to expand...

Poster I don’t recognise

Subs bench

Posting about conspiracies...

Thank god you’re one of the normal ones :D every other new poster is a mentalist

zwartekat said:
This isn't really debating. For reasons I can't fathom you are ignoring or dismissing every piece of evidence that contradicts your own beliefs which appear to be based on nothing much more than you want to believe them. Your misunderstanding of the laser question is a bit sad.
Click to expand...

@Nukehasslefan is just an attention seeking troll who thrives off the attention people give him — like almost all conspiracy theorists.

You prove them wrong and they deflect. It’s maddening so you’re sucked back in. Stop replying and they go away.
 
zwartekat said:
This isn't really debating. For reasons I can't fathom you are ignoring or dismissing every piece of evidence that contradicts your own beliefs which appear to be based on nothing much more than you want to believe them. Your misunderstanding of the laser question is a bit sad.
Click to expand...
I'm far from dismissing every piece of evidence.
I'm dismissing the stories told because I've explained my side.
You couldn't set up a laser anywhere and have it hit a spot to reflect back from a moving target,
You're dismissing any other side because you accept the story without actual proof.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
They supposedly send up craft after craft to a supposed space station to show us how they eat floating meals. And they send gorilla suits up when the cost per pound to send up items is 10's of thousands...not to mention a supposed fully functional Tesla car.

Economic benefits?
I think they're being super economical with the truth.
Click to expand...
I think you're as dumb as Flat Earth Frizzell
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'm not asking you to explain anything to me. I'm simply saying that we are told the earth rotates at over 1000 mph and a laser pointed at a specific thing like a supposed retroreflector would never hit it to come back to source.

It's like sitting on a roundabout and aiming a laser at a person in the playground and expecting it to come right back at you even though your laser aim has missed the person due to your rotation.

It's just not happening no matter how it's spun by the pretenders.

Maybe....but then again, such is life when debating.
Click to expand...
It's not debating. It's you refusing to acknowledge or understand things.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'm far from dismissing every piece of evidence.
I'm dismissing the stories told because I've explained my side.
You couldn't set up a laser anywhere and have it hit a spot to reflect back from a moving target,
You're dismissing any other side because you accept the story without actual proof.
Click to expand...
You could set a laser up in Roker to bounce off a target on the other side of the North Sea.


If the Earth wasn't a globe of course.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Aye, fire it beforehand to a tiny little reflector and hope it hits, eh?
The same thing applies as it does hit, if that was the case. By the time it hit it would've moved away from it and hit the surface.
It's a fantasy story sold to the public, imo.
Click to expand...
You must be on a wind up surely? :lol:

The laser is 2km in size by the time it hits the moon. I explained this just earlier and how only so many photons are reflected back and us 15km on its return.

Yet you come out with this shite? No wonder people dismiss what you say when you either ignore, can't quite grasp the basics.
 
ned_werby said:
I think you're as dumb as Flat Earth Frizzell
Click to expand...
Mackem00 said:
It's not debating. It's you refusing to acknowledge or understand things.
Click to expand...
It is debating. It's not accepting one side of an argument just as you don't.
There would be no debate when we all agree.
MackemX said:
You must be on a wind up surely? :lol:

The laser is 2km in size by the time it hits the moon. I explained this just earlier and how only so many photons are reflected back and us 15km on its return.

Yet you come out with this shite? No wonder people dismiss what you say when you either ignore, can't quite grasp the basics.
Click to expand...
I can read any book and suchlike then argue from that point. It doesn't make what you say, true.
 
Last edited:
Mackem00 said:
No. If someone offers up a scientific explaination for something and your response is just "nah, do not buy it" then it's not really debating. :lol:
Click to expand...
As long as they can prove it's a real scientific explanation and not just a made up story to cater for something being questioned.
And this is what we're dealing with.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
2 men with back packs needing oxygen and water and battery power, spend 75 hours on the moon.

Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and say both their backpacks were capable of holding 8 hours worth of water and oxygen.

let's guess they had 16 hours on the surface and 8 hours sleeping in their LM, per day. I'd be happy to be corrected so I can revise more.

They leave the LM which means they must depressurise, losing that amount of oxygen.
They have 8 hours out and back in the LM, shut the door and repressurise and then they are able to repressurise their back packs with 8 more hours of oxygen.
While this happens they use however long it takes to fill their tanks of oxygen inside the LM. Let's say 1 hour inside before they're kitted up for their next 8 hour jaunt on the surface.

Then they depressurise the LM after suiting up and back for 8 hours.

Then back in for the sleep and refill and repressurise.

There's one day.

And again do this for 2 more days in the same vein.
I'd like to know how that was managed in that vein but also, I'd like to know how they managed to repressurise the tanks and also have all their electrical instruments inside that LM not overheat with zero air circulation when depressurised.

Not to mention the batteries working in a supposed vacuum with supposed temperatures being minus 250 in the shade and plus 250 in sunlight, as we're told.


And also eating and drinking and using the toilet in those suits, because surely they must've kept those suits on given the absolute nightmare it apparently took to actually get in and out of one.

I know....nappies.....but......seriously?

It's no wonder it's questioned...and this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Click to expand...
When it reopens, get yourself to the science museum in London. A lot of what you ask is answered there.
 
zwartekat said:
This isn't really debating. For reasons I can't fathom you are ignoring or dismissing every piece of evidence that contradicts your own beliefs which appear to be based on nothing much more than you want to believe them. Your misunderstanding of the laser question is a bit sad.
Click to expand...
It would be nice if you said this to the UFO debunker's on here and back me up when I'm on a UFO thread. ;)
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It doesn't need to go any farther for me.
The supposed global spin and the actual size of the supposed retroreflector is more than enough for me to understand there would be no direct hit to that retroreflector in order to send back any signal.

The very micro second that laser is sent the laser has shifted away from it and that's to the source.
It's impossible.

There's a topic on this. Take a look what I said.
Click to expand...
The maths shows otherwise as I have just explained. Even a very narrow beam across those distances would still be killometers wide by the time it reaches it's destination.

Like the Apollo LM, I think your problem is you think anything you don't know the answers to or take the time to understand is impossible.
 
zwartekat said:
This isn't really debating. For reasons I can't fathom you are ignoring or dismissing every piece of evidence that contradicts your own beliefs which appear to be based on nothing much more than you want to believe them. Your misunderstanding of the laser question is a bit sad.
Click to expand...
That is something that I have observed. A conspiracy theorists seems to form their own personal view of how the universe should work or look, then if it looks like it should not, global conspiracy.

It is fine just not knowing stuff. That could be at a personal level or just mankind does not know things. Biology is not my thing. I know food, stomach, digestive juices, energy and waste out the bowels, but when you break down the details, I don't know the specifics of why we eat or how it works. I still eat. All the study of the worlds oceans and nobody really knows what happens to basking sharks over winter. They can be seen around our coast in the summer months and then they just go somewhere. Where? Do they still feed? They just don't know. Basking sharks do exist and logic says they continue to exist in the winter.
 

Back
Top