Gareth Thomas rugby player hiv positive

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't have any interest in the topic, just like the other two mugs :lol:

Makes no sense whatsoever this, m8, seeing as though I opened the thread and replied to the OP...

But if that’s what you want to use to amuse yourself and you insist on having the “last word”, keep swinging... ;)
 


Other people missing the point doesn't prove your point, althiugh you haven't made it clear what point you're trying to make.

I suspect you're simply being disagreeable, as usual, and that the only interest in the thread is the OP.

You're well known for latching onto anyone having a pop at me, just as you're doing here.

Stop trying to deflect, man. It’s a simple enough question. Why would he need to be distanced from?

Why wouldn’t you want someone like him as a representative or a focal point? He was a world-class competitor in one of the most popular sports on the planet.

A sport, I may add, is all about strength and aggression.

He seems a good a representative as any for the (no doubt) thousands of other professional sportsman that struggle with being comfortable publicly with their sexuality.

I think you need to stick to the PF forum tbf, you’re way out of your depth here.
 
Last edited:
I have a couple of gay pals, and they say for some it's like a badge of honour in the gay community. I can't quite get me head round that one
 
Other people missing the point doesn't prove your point, althiugh you haven't made it clear what point you're trying to make.

I suspect you're simply being disagreeable, as usual, and that the only interest in the thread is the OP.

You're well known for latching onto anyone having a pop at me, just as you're doing here.

You still haven’t answered the question. I’d also like to know why you think people should distance themselves for him because I haven’t a clue what point you’re trying to make to be honest.
 
You still haven’t answered the question. I’d also like to know why you think people should distance themselves for him because I haven’t a clue what point you’re trying to make to be honest.

Nah, he's made his point perfectly clear. So clear, in fact, that no one on here seems to know what his point it. Except him...
 
You still haven’t answered the question. I’d also like to know why you think people should distance themselves for him because I haven’t a clue what point you’re trying to make to be honest.

Really, you don't have a clue?

What is it about my post that you don't understand?

"I don't believe he represents his cause particularly well and he doesn't seem well equipped to handle the pressure it's putting him under."
Nah, he's made his point perfectly clear. So clear, in fact, that no one on here seems to know what his point it. Except him...


.... 'no one on here' except the 9 people who 'liked the OP' :lol:
 
Last edited:
What would you know about the pressure of covering up your homosexuality for years, then being diagnosed with HIV? Then onto (reportedly) being forced into going public on it before it is released by the press anyway?

Why doesn't he represent 'his cause' particularly well?
 
What would you know about the pressure of covering up your homosexuality for years, then being diagnosed with HIV? Then onto (reportedly) being forced into going public on it before it is released by the press anyway?

Why doesn't he represent 'his cause' particularly well?

What would you know?
 
Whether you agree with the vague points in the OP or not, I think some people really need to work on fundamental reading comprehension skills.
 
Wow, I never knew ...


Did I say he had?
:lol: did i say you had? You're getting awfully touchy and defensive over a simple question asking to clarify a point that you say is very clear. You don't seem very well equipped to deal with conversing and messageboards. In fact you're probably doing more harm than good to whatever your point is, I'm distancing myself from you.
 
I’m not the one saying he doesn’t represent his cause particularly well and people would be better of keeping their distance from him.

:lol:

Neither am I you clown.

I didn't say anything of the sort, you always do this when your argument falls apart.

Misquoting me doesn't prove your point, it destroys it ...
... try to remember that in future.

You have no interest in this thread topic. You're just like your mate Jardine. You see people disagreeing with me and latch on thinking you can use mob law to eventually score a point over me.

It's laughable tbh.
 
Stop trying to deflect, man. It’s a simple enough question. Why would he need to be distanced from?

Why wouldn’t you want someone like him as a representative or a focal point? He was a world-class competitor in one of the most popular sports on the planet.

A sport, I may add, is all about strength and aggression.

He seems a good a representative as any for the (no doubt) thousands of other professional sportsman that struggle with being comfortable publicly with their sexuality.

I think you need to stick to the PF forum tbf, you’re way out of your depth here.


And you should stick to yer own club boards ya snide fooka,
 
What would you know about the pressure of covering up your homosexuality for years, then being diagnosed with HIV? Then onto (reportedly) being forced into going public on it before it is released by the press anyway?

Why doesn't he represent 'his cause' particularly well?
Are you the lad who was caught being snidey as fuck about a lass off here on a rival board? I lose track of who's who.
 
:lol:

Neither am I you clown.

I didn't say anything of the sort, you always do this when your argument falls apart.

Misquoting me doesn't prove your point, it destroys it ...
... try to remember that in future.

You have no interest in this thread topic. You're just like your mate Jardine. You see people disagreeing with me and latch on thinking you can use mob law to eventually score a point over me.

It's laughable tbh.

Why don't you think he represents his cause well (which you've omitted from your bolding)?

It's a bit daft suggesting I would use 'mob law' considering what my reputation is on here. Totally irrelevant too.

Speaking of 'mob law', seems they're starting to turn up in here. I'll let the thread carry on to avoid the inevitable derailment.
 
Last edited:
:lol: did i say you had? You're getting awfully touchy and defensive over a simple question asking to clarify a point that you say is very clear. You don't seem very well equipped to deal with conversing and messageboards. In fact you're probably doing more harm than good to whatever your point is, I'm distancing myself from you.

Unlike your eloquent eloquent intellectual chums calling me a c/unt, a tool and a dick, etc :lol:

Are they well equipped at conversing, give your head a shake man.

Are they being touchy and defensive ...
... now attempt to respond to that question without any hypocrisy.

Away you go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top