LondonMackem
Striker
Logon or register to see this image
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He should have cashed out as soon at the goal went in!
He should have cashed out as soon at the goal went in!
Show proof your mate cashed out in the 92 minutes and d I will no issue.
Show proof your mate cashed out in the 92 minutes and d I will no issue.
Until then stop posting random betting slips
The principle is flawed because you still have humans making the calls on a game with some subjective laws
my mate also cashed out when city scored
I’ve already done that with the screenshot a few posts up showing a cash out in the 91st minute.Show proof your mate cashed out in the 92 minutes and d I will no issue.
Until then stop posting random betting slips
But what is absolutely bullshit, is checking every goal when the ref doesn't think it needs to happen - or VAR intervening when neither the ref or players have asked for it. That's bullshit and they should scrap it.
This is typical of the type of complaints VAR is getting. It sounds sensible and reasoned but you need to think through what would actually occur in practise.
Let's take the handball as an example. By your logic, next week we have a goal ruled out for handball, in very similar circumstances to Laporte although. The referee suspects there may have been a handball and VAR confirms it.
The week after there is a similar but slightly more subtle handball. The ref doesn't see it and neither do the players. As a result VAR leave it alone.
Later that day when SSN show the ball glancing the goal scorers hand, what do you think the reaction will be? What about the handball last week!? Total meltdown - team were robbed, where's the consistency? Referee will be slaughtered. People will slaughter the officials and there will be a clamour for a rematch and/or a reallocation of points.
Personally, my prediction is that on field decisions on interpretative decisions will very rarely be overturned. It will mainly be for offsides and attacking handball where no interpretation is necessary.
This is indicative of the problem with VAR actually. All other sports that have successfully implemented technology-assisted adjudicating have quite explicitly not been aiming for perfection. There are still incorrect lbw decisions in cricket, for example, even though that one can pretty much be decided objectively.
Bad decisions are part of the game, part of all games and technology doesn't change that. Hasn't in rugby, hasn't in cricket, hasn't in American Football, hasn't in tennis. So the scenario you sketch out not only will happen, it should happen - and people will have to put up with it, as they have for years.
Besides, the handball issue isn't technically about VAR, it's about the handball law.
Didn't ask you tit.I’ve already done that with the screenshot a few posts up showing a cash out in the 91st minute.
Didn't ask you tit.
My god how hard is it? If Hudson shows his mates cash out and not random ones I'll square up until he stops lying fuck off
Didn't ask you tit.
My god how hard is it? If Hudson shows his mates cash out and not random ones I'll square up until he stops lying fuck off
That's a lie now pay upI’ve shown it, but then you already know that.
Deciding instead to act clever on the internet and go back on a £20 donation to a cancer charity.