Deleted User 18963
New Member
Exactly when leadership was required and you look to your captain to step up he went f***ing missing which to be fair is the one thing he is good at
Honeyman said he didn't want to take a penalty. That's enough for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly when leadership was required and you look to your captain to step up he went f***ing missing which to be fair is the one thing he is good at
I know for a certainly he refused one.
So, you wouldn't want us in say, Man City's shoes?
Not sell McGeough ,HE TRIGGERED THE EXTENSION WHEN ONLY OFFER HE GOT WAS FROM ABERDEEN WHOSE WAGES OFFER NOT GOOD ENOUGH .NO OFFER FROM US SO TRIGGERED IT HIMSELF .HAVING TO SHOUT SICK OF POSTING THIS.
Definitely not, there's no comparison for me.
No the question is why did the captain and leader not step up
Agreed. It’s up there with the body language expertsI'm against this penalty argument like, for all we know 11 players wanted one, you can still only pick 5.
Because he thought he would miss? Let's face it, if he'd taken one and missed he'd have been crucified on here in a way Catts wasn't. The lad couldn't win.
I know for a certainly he refused one.
You have to have been in the top division in order to be the “top division version” of something.MK Dons was a top division version of MK Donsweren't they?
So, you'd rather see George Honeyman turning out for us than David Silva?
So, you'd rather see George Honeyman turning out for us than David Silva?
And Catts probably shouldn't have. A better question is why Wyke didn't take one.
Best thing to happen for all parties. He gets a load of unfair stick and the fact he’ll be moving to a higher level shows he’s better than he’s given credit for. Good luck to the lad.
He bottled it. You can try and spin that anyway you like
What if he's just not very good at penalties