Dogs without training

Status
Not open for further replies.
My mother in law (no) dog has attacked her tenant, bit her on hand and foot.

Same dog attacked me and ripped a chunk out of my bicep and mauled my two hands when i was punching the twat to get off me.

I feel my mother in law should get rid of the dog, hes a liability, especially in the US, but i also realise hes her buddy.

Its not the dogs fault, he was a rescue, but my mother in law is just not strong enough to control him.

Whats best solution for dog? Rehousing would seemingly traumatise him but also he shouldnt be around people
 


For a dog to rip a chunk from your bicep that could easily have been your face or neck. Imagine what could happen if it switches on a kid

Yup, he went for me when i was on a low chair. I wouldnt trust it around anything. Dont want to see it destroyed but i honestly cant see how he can be around people
 
Yup, he went for me when i was on a low chair. I wouldnt trust it around anything. Dont want to see it destroyed but i honestly cant see how he can be around people

Surely she should keep it in the house and around people the dog is familiar with.

She’s the owner, she should be taking responsibility.

Did the tenant take it further? If she took an aggressive dog to her rental property with a tenant inside then that’s just shear stupidity.
 
Yup, he went for me when i was on a low chair. I wouldnt trust it around anything. Dont want to see it destroyed but i honestly cant see how he can be around people

Then muzzle the dog and keep it in a seperate room to home visitors. It would be sad for it to be put down, but the damage it could do to somebody could be deadly.
 
Sound like the dog needs to calm down a bit. Somebody has obviously trained it to be snappy. Detrain it then train it to be a good boy/girl.

I'll take the hound
Over my dead body its mine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Get it put down. Imagine if it got hold of a bairn man.

No need to kill a dog because the owner is irresponsible. We don’t even kill serial peados or child killers in this country, yet it’s okay to put a dog down because it freaks out and attacks when probably scared?

Keep it in familiar territory and company, or keep it muzzled. Dog’s weren’t created to be pets, we put ourselves in this situation so we should be responsible for them, not just kill them off if they don’t play by our rules straight away.
 
What is its name?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s already asserted its Alpha dominancy in the household,biting humans is a no-no,putting it to sleep is the best option,hope there’s no small children who visit the household who toddle along at face-muzzle level,it’s happened before,dogs savaging children,it will no doubt happen again with untrained assertive canines.
 
No need to kill a dog because the owner is irresponsible. We don’t even kill serial peados or child killers in this country, yet it’s okay to put a dog down because it freaks out and attacks when probably scared?

Keep it in familiar territory and company, or keep it muzzled. Dog’s weren’t created to be pets, we put ourselves in this situation so we should be responsible for them, not just kill them off if they don’t play by our rules straight away.

Plus we don’t kill child killers but we kill cows, sheep and chickens etc., who haven’t bitten anybody at all, and then we cut them up and eat them.

Or, in other words, your logic is slightly flawed
 
At the end of the day you should be a responsible owner. Dog should be muzzled and trained properly.


Plus we don’t kill child killers but we kill cows, sheep and chickens etc., who haven’t bitten anybody at all, and then we cut them up and eat them.

Or, in other words, your logic is slightly flawed

Just beucase we do doesn't make it right.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top