Herberthall
Winger
When we signed him some of their supporters came on here and said he's finished.but their fans rated him and apparently he did really well the year before we signed him.
Was a decent Championship CH but that was a while ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When we signed him some of their supporters came on here and said he's finished.but their fans rated him and apparently he did really well the year before we signed him.
well those ones are right but I distinctly remember links to their forums saying what a great signing he was for us and that they were sorry he had gone.When we signed him some of their supporters came on here and said he's finished.
Was a decent Championship CH but that was a while ago.
How wrong they were.well those ones are right but I distinctly remember links to their forums saying what a great signing he was for us and that they were sorry he had gone.
peole on here were whining like fuck about hume and embleton contracts-caloing the owners all sorts of names for not getting it done..then s soon as they sign fans decdie they shouldnt play..not good enough etc..what the fuck was the point if signing them then? they arent youth players-they have to be good enough for league one now or its not justified employing them..I hope so.
But it’s a big gamble.
We played cautiously to cover for the defensive frailties imo.
Stronger defence hopefully means more freedom further up.
Loovens is a waste of a squad number. He won’t get near the first team and pointless playing him in the Reserves.
I agree. At the age now where it's time for them to show what they've got. It's not as if it's premier league football we're asking for them to step up too. If they want to be decent professional footballers, then at their age they need to be playing at this level now.peole on here were whining like fuck about hume and embleton contracts-caloing the owners all sorts of names for not getting it done..then s soon as they sign fans decdie they shouldnt play..not good enough etc..what the fuck was the point if signing them then? they arent youth players-they have to be good enough for league one now or its not justified employing them..
and the probelm is some people say "lets give em time" but if they need time-then by the time they are ready to be league one players-i would hope we would be a championship club-so they would still be behind,..and we cant have that..I agree. At the age now where it's time for them to show what they've got. It's not as if it's premier league football we're asking for them to step up too. If they want to be decent professional footballers, then at their age they need to be playing at this level now.
Shift Oviedo and Loovens, bring this lad in and then use Flanagan as cover across the back four. Job done.
4th best and finished 5th. We were aiming to finish top 2 so that clearly isn't good enough. Never mind that it was clear as day to anyone that watched our games we played very defensively and we have the best keeper in the league so goals against doesn't show the full picture.last yer we had one of the very best defensive records in the legaue..
Plenty goals and creativity in our team if we played a more attacking systemWhich would be fine if we had enough creativity to score more than 1 goal.
4th best and finished 5th-so our defence outperformed the other areas of the team..if the other areas had perfored as well we would have been 4th overall.4th best and finished 5th. We were aiming to finish top 2 so that clearly isn't good enough. Never mind that it was clear as day to anyone that watched our games we played very defensively and we have the best keeper in the league so goals against doesn't show the full picture.
Plenty goals and creativity in our team if we played a more attacking system
But 4th is still no good, plus the midfield spent more time in defence than attack4th best and finished 5th-so our defence outperformed the other areas of the team..if the other areas had perfored as well we would have been 4th overall.
Which still wouldn't have been good enough.4th best and finished 5th-so our defence outperformed the other areas of the team..if the other areas had perfored as well we would have been 4th overall.
4th best and finished 5th-so our defence outperformed the other areas of the team..if the other areas had perfored as well we would have been 4th overall.
Interesting to look back on this thread posted by @Johnsafc to see how Heneghan and Willis stack up. On the amount of ground and air challenges they win they're both down on Jack Baldwin. Maybe a note of caution is worth sounding here. Obviously other factors come into play outside of these two. They're pretty important though - and shouldn't be discounted.
yes in that scenario the defence wou;d, or would look, like it was outperforming the rest...you wouldnt change the defence in that scenario, you would change the other players and or the formation..which is exactly hat I thinksafc need to do..In a scenario where a team was ultra defensive and had every player defending behind the ball,we could draw 0-0 every game. We'd have the best defence in the league,but we'd be nowhere near the top. The defence would outperform the other areas of the team simply because there weren't any other areas with any goal-scoring intent.
4th best and finished 5th-so our defence outperformed the other areas of the team..if the other areas had perfored as well we would have been 4th overall.
Are theyYeah I mean Willis at 5'11 I can't imagine he's particularly dominant. Both better than Flanagan mind!