• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover in trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.

Safc88 said:
Thats it. Obviously could be all shite but if true fuck me what a mess
Click to expand...

I'm very wary of social media just look at the situation with Cattermole, nobody saw that coming. But that post I've copied seems really odd. If it's someone trying to stir shit and they get found out I hope they get named, if it turns out to be true then we have some serious underlying issues in the club, again.
 
Coeus said:
I can't be bothered to go through all the podcasts but from the first search, I found this

You must be logged on to see media items

11:50 Charlie M states it is to secure the payment and then mixes his words to the effect of there not earmarked for that reason.

Regardless of if the money will come back at some point, there should be 24m sat in Sunderlands accounts and not Maddrox's.

To then later state "CM noted that the parachute payment money was always intended to pay off SBC bank debt, and that was precisely the “money coming back into the club”" is dishonest.

Prior to this, I have been critical of the strategy but behind them as people and their intentions. Not after this unless I am getting something very wrong here.

@Cack Stottie can you tell me if I have made it up that SD has repeatedly said on the podcasts that the parachutes were to secure the payment ensuring that he would be paid and inferred that they would do that?
Click to expand...
My main concern was the football side of things. I always felt that we'd be ok on the financial. But today was a real eye opener. It shows they have been dishonest and have more or less called people liars if they questioned them.
 
Pepe said:
How is a view an agenda?

Would you be less concerned if the view was one you agreed with?
Click to expand...

Having a view doesn't constitute an agenda. The same poster showing up on multiple threads, posting the same thing over and over again, and trying to convince everyone he's uncovered some elaborate scam by simply reading the info as negatively as possible does.
 
Scootsie said:
Where has this come from, btw? I haven’t kept up with the thread.

They’ve done a podcast together since the first Wembley game, haven’t they? so them not sitting together doesn’t really mean anything.

The rest of it is anyone’s guess.
Click to expand...
Its doing the rounds, i got sent it earlier, its on some facebook pages. Fuck nars where it originally come from
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top