• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover in trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.
Horace Cope said:
There is a conspiracy that the club is skint and Stewart used the clubs own money to purchase us despite no official accounts having been filed
Click to expand...

People will still say thats fine if he has, in fact they did when the first rumour game out

Some people are beyond help
 

KittenMittens said:
1 It's not a personal attack. I was just suggesting that when we're in person, it's easy to be charmed, even if we're wary. GOM is probably aware of this himself and has acknowledged that he has to be careful about what he says to maintain any kind of relationship (whether he still wants it or not is anyone's guess!). He is a good egg and hey, where I come from licking arse is barely an insult.

2 No, not disproven. There are still huge unknowns as GOM says, and sometimes what is not said, or how some things are said, is grating when trying to forensically understand where the money is, was and will be.

3 I don't know. Nobody does. I am asking the questions, providing an interpretation. We may literally never know depending on how Madrox file their accounts and what we're able to class as 100% fact, which is inordinately difficult with these people.
Click to expand...

1 calling someone an arselicker with an agenda of getting noticed by the club so he can be brought in IS a personal attack, and its disingenuous to say otherwise.

2 only the club knows

3 only the club knows.

So what you're left with is a negative assumption of the worst.

If that's the case it's up to you to prove it, not call people 'arselicker'.
 
sksk3021 said:
But you will already have spent the years regardless of whether you play them or not!
Click to expand...

As stated, the intended goal is for them to sign contracts from the first point they're able (16?) so that we always have the right to extend if they're progressing and they get incremental bonuses.

I think they're aiming this at the 17-22 year olds in the squad. Obviously those under the age where you can sign a contract can walk of they at choose.

It's a sensible plan if applied properly.

Black Cat Gypsy said:
Just been reading the minutes of the RAWA meeting. It doesn't sound good and SD and CM have been a bit loose with the truth and not 100% as transparent as people make out.
Click to expand...

This is the third thread I've seen you on saying the exact same thing. No wonder people question whether you have an agenda.

You seem to have made it your goal to spread as much panic as possible while pretending you're just impartially reading the minutes (and taking the most pessimistic view imaginable as already pointed out on other threads)
 
Last edited:
Nelson! said:
As stated, the intended goal is for them to sign contracts from the first point they're able (16?) so that we always have the right to extend if they're progressing and they get incremental bonuses.

I think they're aiming this at the 17-22 year olds in the squad. Obviously those under the age where you can sign a contract can walk of they at choose.

It's a sensible plan if applied properly.



This is the third thread I've seen you on saying the exact same thing. No wonder people question whether you have an agenda.

You seem to have made it your goal to spread as much panic as possible while pretending you're just impartially reading the minutes (and taking the most pessimistic view imaginable as already pointed out on other threads)
Click to expand...
I think you are right it’s a sensible plan but they haven’t been hear to do it with Maja or Kimpioka for example. We are going to have a lot of players out of contract next summer.
 
Nelson! said:
That's optimistic. This kind of nonsense was going on here all during last season.

The match was just a distraction in between the moaning and accusations.
Click to expand...

At least when its to do with the football people know a little bit about what they are talking about. Bar about 2% of people on here nee fucker has a single clue about our finances but plenty seem very keen to convince us they do
 
sksk3021 said:
I think you are right it’s a sensible plan but they haven’t been hear to do it with Maja or Kimpioka for example. We are going to have a lot of players out of contract next summer.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Too late with those lads but hopefully they've learned a lesson.

In hindsight Maja should have been sorted as a matter of priority but no one knew how he's perform at L1. Most on here were very skeptical.

If they implement that policy now then hopefully we won't have any more Maja situations.....or at least we can command a big fee.
 
Chancer of the highest order is that prick.

And that horrible little salmon-panted Methven is a f***ing parasite. Done nothing but slag our fans off from day one.

You’ve been found out boys, I hope ya reading this forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top