• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover in trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grumpy Old Man said:
There are those who will never be happy. There may be sensible people who still don't like what's happened. I can't control that. I can only (finally) post my take on what I think it all means. People can agree or disagree.
Click to expand...
Good on you and please don't stop providing your take on events, it's most appreciated marra
 
Chop Sauce said:
All of the clappers fell for the spin and guff, getting the club back, PR stunts, put the seats in yourself etc etc. truth is last season was shite, manager was shite, and now the truth is really coming out about these two blaggers.
Click to expand...
What proof? please elaborate and provide documented facts.

What i know is that the club was destined for the scrap heap with apathy from both players and supporters. Last season there was a reconnect as we started seeing both the club and the supporters working together.

At the end of the day we didn't get promoted but i for one was proud of my club again.
 
Re this timebomb of information that people can't divulge, is it information that the owners are legally obliged to disclose?
Or are they trying to be open with the supporters and shooting themselves in the feet?
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
In my opinion, no. There's been loose language, and you can never be sure there are thing left unsaid.
Click to expand...

This is the inherent problem GOM. I appreciate you are trying to be positive, but I'll be honest it sounds like (in the nicest possible terms) you are um, tonguing their collective arseholes, with the idea that if you do that enough, they'll let you in the front door to have full penetrative sex (with their accounts). I don't think they ever will let you near Madrox's accounts, but the bigger problem is the language and evasiveness.

I just doubt very much whether the statements and language in the minutes will be categorical, or completely disprove the idea that the £10m loan was used to pay off Donald's personal debt for the shares. I also doubt it will provide a solid schedule of repayment.

If I'm wrong, I'll happily say so, but you're definitely interpreting their words as 'inarticulate' rather than 'disingenuous'. I think they often say things like 'it wasnt 32m' rather than 'it was 25m and we loaned ourselves the rest' for example.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top