• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Charlie Methven on metro radio

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mrjardine said:
Methven needs to learn that dealing in facts (well facts that don’t suit) in regards to our fans wont end well.
Click to expand...

He also needs to learn that if you come in and play to the gallery about us being ‘the biggest club to ever have played in this division’ and being bigger than the Mags etc then you have to deal with questions that emerge when we don’t get out of said division. And dealing with those questions by responding that we are no bigger than Charlton because they sold a few more thousand tickets for a fixture on their doorstep isn’t particularly the best way, sounds hypocritical and is unnecessarily provocative.
 
NorthCountryBoy said:
He didn't say it was the fans fault if you're on about the Metro interview.
Click to expand...

He didn’t. But for some reason some people have taken it that way and agreed with it. That’s far dafter than the people who have taken it that way and disagreed with it.

He talks some rubbish in the interview and completely unnecessarily brought our support both in terms of numbers and volume into the discussion to an unrelated point that was being made.
 
offmenut said:
Doesn't bother me, as in the context it was to show that Charlton fans, as well as Safc fans think they shouldnt be in league one, taking 40k to Wembley and being a prem club recently.
But I can see that's offended you massively. That and trying to increase safcs turnover by getting (and succeeding may I add) more folk to attend the SOL.
I think you're being a bit ott in your opinion of him, maybe due to a prejudice against posh torys?
Click to expand...

Don't know any posh Tory's tbf so you are getting a bit ahead of yourself there mind ya

Let's see how much increased turnover there is next season

I'm sure his next waffle will be.
'we have a new investor , someone has put 4 million into the club the future is rosy''
He is a f***ing joke man and people like you lap it up
 
The atmosphere issue is being blown totally out of proportion, it was not great from Charlton at all.

They made noise when they scored and the last 10 minutes when we were being pinned back.

It's hard to create a rocking atmosphere when your own team won't pass the half way line
 
Wood Green Mackem said:
agree

the interviewer made the derogatory comment about Charlton and got the honest response.

I don't like the fact the daytrippers won out , but as a club we don't have a divine right to get promoted.
Click to expand...

The interviewer made absolutely no comment on Charlton Athletic whatsoever.

He never mentioned them once. Either comparing us to them on or off the park. You’ve completely made that up :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Difficult to create a decent atmosphere when you watch your team consistently fail to hold onto a 1-0 lead throughout the second half of the season, as well as watching us barely press the opposition for the ball when it's in our own half.

Playing negative football doesn't help us at all.
 
jimbob said:
Very succinct.
So could it be that the limit of his cash investment is actually £1,000 and he got his 6% ownership of Madrox effectively through the sweat of being the PR?
If so, could it also be the case that he is expensed for transport and subsistence/sundry costs. I wonder if he also invoices fees or draws a salary from Madrox?
@Grumpy Old Man
Click to expand...

No-one draws a salary from Madrox - it's purely an investment vehicle. Long-term is will probably be a dormant company (that is, owning the shares but conducting no active business. If he got anything from Sunderland or SAFC, it would be buried in the note on director's pay and there's no requirement in private companies to disclose individual director's pay. If Dragon PR were reimbursed for his time, that would need to be shown as a related party transaction; there's no such disclosure in any of the accounts.
 
Mrjardine said:
Methven needs to learn that dealing in facts (well facts that don’t suit) in regards to our fans wont end well.
Click to expand...
Saying the attendance at Wembley is indicative of charlton being as big a club is a deflection tactic..look at the seasons attendances..if we were playing the final down the road at Borough on a bank holiday weekend who would have the greater allocation?
To apportion any blame onto fans for being quiet is frankly bollocks.
Not getting promoted has nothing to do with the fan base.He needs to be careful not to lose those he has spent the season encouraging.
 
jimbob said:
The orange skinned 6% salmon pants superman doesn't half talk alot of cacbabble. He's basically just said Sunderland fans aren't good enough!!!
I'll repeat.. A total failure has just insinuated its the fans' fault!

I tell you who's not good enough.. you sir. You made a bet which hasn't come off and now your are blaming the fans in your roundabout nancy pancy sort of way.

You are outed with a tattered and scarred reputation..
Click to expand...
They weren’t good enough Sunday.
Charlton took the roof off.
 
Daks said:
Don't know any posh Tory's tbf so you are getting a bit ahead of yourself there mind ya

Let's see how much increased turnover there is next season

I'm sure his next waffle will be.
'we have a new investor , someone has put 4 million into the club the future is rosy''
He is a f***ing joke man and people like you lap it up
Click to expand...
He's done a lot of good man.
Folk twist at anything.
Folk on here were gannin radge at him for setting the 40k boxing day target, that no one thought we'd reach and it would be embarrassing.
He helped us get over 46k there, which were all proud of.
Some haters just want to hate.
He's been very good for us
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top