Secret Visage
Striker
Being ruined by a MLF still.Dowoffyyy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Being ruined by a MLF still.Dowoffyyy
Air tightBeing ruined by a MLF still.
Not even close. Just because he’s owed £140 million in loans (plus the £90 million he paid) it doesn’t mean the club is worth that much otherwise we’d have been valued at £150 million. Newcastle is simply not worth more than 4x what he paid for it.
Will he fuck, you think hes bothered about a bunch of scruffy ***** shouting nasty things at shops and restaurantsIf a good offer finally comes in for the club he'll snap it up quicker than shit off a stick.
He bought the club for £140m, with a debt of £70m, although he later claimed once he purchased it he found the debt to be £100m.
'Sunderland fan in distorting facts about NUFC shocker'
Jim Branning's latest meltdoon.
You must be logged on to see external linksYou must be logged on to see external links
Michael Martin Retweeted The Chronicle
Why is The Chronicle doing this? They know Charnley didn't GET Rafa. Rafa GOTYou must be logged on to see external linksCharnley did GET McClaren tho
It's only worth what someone else is prepared to pay for it.Forbes and Price of Football both value nufc around £270m. Not even twice what he paid. Clearly dependent on PL status though. Add in his debt of £140m and it comes in at £400m.
It's only worth what someone else is prepared to pay for it.
Staveley could find enough down the back of the sofa to tempt Ashley, Kenyon seemingly can't find anyone to back him as it's all gone quiet and Ashley pissed the Man City owners off preferring an extra hour in the pub by all accounts.
Step forward Sir Mike of Ashley.
According to the interview Stavely done, the group she represented met his valuation in a few ways, either the cash purchase for a lesser amount or the instalments for a higher amount. The conditions set out by Ashley. He then decided he didn't want to sell. He also claimed there were other offers on the table which turned out to be lies.
According to the interview Stavely done, the group she represented met his valuation in a few ways, either the cash purchase for a lesser amount or the installments for a higher amount. The conditions set out by Ashley. He then decided he didn't want to sell. He also claimed there were other offers on the table which turned out to be lies.
As for the Peter Kenyon story I wouldn't believe that for a second. Why would the story come out of an embryonic bid? He didn't even have a consortium together. It's like me announcing I'm gonna buy it, just looking for financial backers
According to Staveley. Does anyone know how trustworthy she is?
She appears to enjoy the limelight as the same happened with Liverpool.
So a cash purchase for a lesser amounts meets his valuation?![]()
Well there's a story from the Polygon consortium fronted by Steve McMahon who were looking to buy it but then when it looked like it could happen, Ashley pulled the plug.
Barry Moat attempting to buy it and Ashley pulling the plug then denying it ever happened.
Stavely saying they met his valuation twice, then Ashley pulling the plug.
The Mansours wanting it until Ashley sabotaged the meeting, a story told by Ashley's man who had brokered the meeting.
So that's 4 times where Ashley has got cold feet, so are the other 3 untrustworthy as well? The common denominator is Ashley pulling out.
I've no idea regarding the rest but, Staveley turning-up for a televised game in order to attract media attention would have set off alarm bells for me. Also, the fact she was talking about her investors wanting a return before a deal was agreed.
I doubt I'd trust her more than Ashley and I reckon you dodged a bullet.
If they'd met either or both of these valuations then surely he'd have sold?Well there's a story from the Polygon consortium fronted by Steve McMahon who were looking to buy it but then when it looked like it could happen, Ashley pulled the plug.
Barry Moat attempting to buy it and Ashley pulling the plug then denying it ever happened.
Stavely saying they met his valuation twice, then Ashley pulling the plug.
The Mansours wanting it until Ashley sabotaged the meeting, a story told by Ashley's man who had brokered the meeting.
So that's 4 times where Ashley has got cold feet, so are the other 3 untrustworthy as well? The common denominator is Ashley pulling out.
Yes.
He released a statement saying he would accept a lesser value as a single lump sum, or would take a higher amount in installements. The Stavely group offered both.
If they'd met either or both of these valuations then surely he'd have sold?
Something doesn't add up about it all and seeing as they've not been back again (she's a bit of a media whore, so if they had it'd be public) and Ashley still has the club, I'd suggest they couldn't actually back the bid with cash.
I’m getting the impression that Ashley now “gets” Newcastle as your lot put it, and just doesn’t want to leave.According to the interview Stavely done, the group she represented met his valuation in a few ways, either the cash purchase for a lesser amount or the installments for a higher amount. The conditions set out by Ashley. He then decided he didn't want to sell. He also claimed there were other offers on the table which turned out to be lies.
I’m getting the impression that Ashley now “gets” Newcastle as your lot put it, and just doesn’t want to leave.
So from that they could get together £250 million towards the £380 million asking price.I've just been having a look, first bid was £300m with installments, second bid £350 in installments, 3rd bid £250m cash.
This was the offers made after they'd looked at the books.
There was a mistake i made here, it was that I had Ashley as pricing it at £300m, but apparently he wanted £380m (according to a couple of papers), but not sure if that asking price is true as there's no quotes to say what his actual asking price was.