flusheding
Striker
Seems a lot of people are foaming at the mouth and ignoring this.The costs to the club has to be part of this bit
"Under current rules, clubs are only obliged to pay for policing in the stadium and on their land, leading to the taxpayer picking up most of the bill."
So if the taxpayer and not the club pay for police when the police aren't on land owned by the club, surely our increased costs are due to the club actually owning a lot of our own land around the stadium, where as Newcastle basically don't own their stadium and are in the middle of a city centre
That would also explain why London clubs where most of the police are away from the grounda in local streets paid nothing as well
Football clubs only pay for police when the police ARE NOT ON PUBLIC LAND
This is why the Met Police only got £300,000 in an entire YEAR from London clubs, as the London clubs basically have zero public land around their stadiums.
Policing football games costs Met £6.7m Police spent 6.7 million and got 361,000 back.
If you want to blame anyone, blame the Government for not allowing police forces to recover proper amounts from clubs. Or blame Sunderland for having lots of private land and Newcastle having a couple of pavements and a car park