• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Pearson Consortium

Status
Not open for further replies.
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Have you ever thought about shutting the hell up and just allowing a person to have his or her view without grief and aggro? I am 100% correct with the view I have. I am 100% allowed it. All I wish for, as I have said twice already, is just somewhere where I can get a good, authentic, reliable, trustworthy bit of info about Mr Pearson and his group and where we are at.
Click to expand...

You won't find that here mate, I don't think his group has ever been mentioned anywhere , only him.
 

ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Have you ever thought about shutting the hell up and just allowing a person to have his or her view without grief and aggro? I am 100% correct with the view I have. I am 100% allowed it. All I wish for, as I have said twice already, is just somewhere where I can get a good, authentic, reliable, trustworthy bit of info about Mr Pearson and his group and where we are at.
Click to expand...
I'm afraid you're not going to get that anywhere until SAFC.com confirm a takeover has taken place
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
So where the heck are we with this takeover business then? When I want news I want it to be 100% accurate and positive with a very good source I know to exist and be true.

I don't want it to be from a forum member who happen to be friends of neighbours whose uncle's nephew's best friend from school is part of a business that is a supplier to the catering of Sunderland AFC.

I don't want someone on a forum who happens to be from a general financial company not connected to the club or Mr Pearson who leaves people in a daze over complex financial waffle.

I don't want it to be from some social media account.

I don't want it to be from some rag who is widely known for not having accuracy in their articles and having a reliable network of reputable contacts.

I want it to be from a place the world and his wife could tell me is a very good place for reliable, accurate info and can give me assurances of past truths said.

Problem is regarding Mr Person one person is saying one thing and another person something else totally contradictory. Who is more truthful? The one who says Mr Pearson isn't taking over or the one who says he is taking over?
Click to expand...


You need The Daily Mail, mate; I like to think of it as a quality newspaper.
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
So where the heck are we with this takeover business then? When I want news I want it to be 100% accurate and positive with a very good source I know to exist and be true.

I don't want it to be from a forum member who happen to be friends of neighbours whose uncle's nephew's best friend from school is part of a business that is a supplier to the catering of Sunderland AFC.

I don't want someone on a forum who happens to be from a general financial company not connected to the club or Mr Pearson who leaves people in a daze over complex financial waffle.

I don't want it to be from some social media account.

I don't want it to be from some rag who is widely known for not having accuracy in their articles and having a reliable network of reputable contacts.

I want it to be from a place the world and his wife could tell me is a very good place for reliable, accurate info and can give me assurances of past truths said.

Problem is regarding Mr Person one person is saying one thing and another person something else totally contradictory. Who is more truthful? The one who says Mr Pearson isn't taking over or the one who says he is taking over?
Click to expand...

if you don't want any of that, don't log into forums. don't turn on the television or radio.

Don't talk to anybody about football.

In fact don't talk to anybody.

Go into a dark room and just lie down.

Need to get real SBC. This is the real world where things may be about to happen and for some reason they don't.

we can always get everything we want in life and sometimes life is just not so easy.
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Have you ever thought about shutting the hell up and just allowing a person to have his or her view without grief and aggro? I am 100% correct with the view I have. I am 100% allowed it. All I wish for, as I have said twice already, is just somewhere where I can get a good, authentic, reliable, trustworthy bit of info about Mr Pearson and his group and where we are at.
Click to expand...

You can find all of this just past the end of the pier. You'll need a good run up though otherwise you'll not see it.
 
Agent Black Cat said:
I would love to know more about @KittensMitten’s information but he/she is keeping it close to their chest. Any update @KittenMittens?
Click to expand...

None. I am hoping that by not leaking anything specific that in turn outs the whole process, I'll be given more access when things progress. My guess now is that despite their % being very. very high about where the deal is at, it's actually got to still get over a number of hurdles. The way Bain spoke yesterday indicated that he hadn't let anyone get in front of Short as yet. That's the only thing I've subtly asked as I don't want to be constantly asking for information.

admwil said:
You mean mad bob/Kaz?
Click to expand...

Logon or register to see this image
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Have you ever thought about shutting the hell up and just allowing a person to have his or her view without grief and aggro? I am 100% correct with the view I have. I am 100% allowed it. All I wish for, as I have said twice already, is just somewhere where I can get a good, authentic, reliable, trustworthy bit of info about Mr Pearson and his group and where we are at.
Click to expand...

You are 100% allowed your view but how can it ever be 100% correct when it is exactly that, your view?
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Did you not read all the post? Or just the bits that fit your narrow minded view of me? I said categorically all I wanted is to read news from a place everyone knows is a very good source of info with a very good and renowned, known list of equally reliable contacts. Nothing else, which I state above, gives me any hope or assurance that what is being said is true. Not some forum member who has some friend whose neighbour's uncle's nephew's school friend from years back supplies the lager to the bar. Not some vague guess on some social media account. Just a place we all know is 1000% reliable with a 1000% reliable contact with the absolute gospel.
Click to expand...
We're SAFC fans on a footy forum ffs, what you're expecting is just ridiculous. All you're going to get is speculation and rumour on here. Someone might be right today, but then it changes and they're wrong tomorrow for all we know. If all you want is 100% accuracy and fact, then log off and wait till SAFC announce it, whenever that is.
 
John J Rambo said:
We're SAFC fans on a footy forum ffs, what you're expecting is just ridiculous. All you're going to get is speculation and rumour on here. Someone might be right today, but then it changes and they're wrong tomorrow for all we know. If all you want is 100% accuracy and fact, then log off and wait till SAFC announce it, whenever that is.
Click to expand...
Exactly
 
ShieldsBlackCat2015 said:
Have you ever thought about shutting the hell up and just allowing a person to have his or her view without grief and aggro? I am 100% correct with the view I have. I am 100% allowed it. All I wish for, as I have said twice already, is just somewhere where I can get a good, authentic, reliable, trustworthy bit of info about Mr Pearson and his group and where we are at.
Click to expand...
Not grief or aggro (which is what you have tried to give me) but a football forum is the wrong place to find what you are looking for.
 
GinoBartali said:
I do work for a fund manager, we place capital for the likes of Blackrock, Ardent Capital, Topland, Legal & General and Triplepoint. About 70% of the capital we place is for the acquisition of operational companies. I can guarantee you that the loan provider will endeavour to make sure that the full amount of the debt remains serviceable not only by the legal entity with whom the loan sits but also with the shareholders. There are precedents in property law and company law that ensure this is the case. It’s entirely standard that a loan agreement will have a section dealing with the event of assignment of a loan to a third party. In this case, a third party would be a prospective purchaser and new owner.

An ordinary deal would be done on the basis of “cash out debt out” where none of this would apply. This won’t be, as every conversation to date has alluded to transferring the debt to new owners. That and the fact that I don’t see sufficient assets within the business to satisfy the debt in full anyway, meaning ES must be carrying a personal guarantee.
Click to expand...

There are two debts, the SBC loan, and a loan from Drumaville Linited, in essence , Short. It's this second loan that's being talked about as transferred. The charge document for the loan can be found here
You must be logged on to see external links
.Have fun.
 
thecloughywobble said:
Of course, why didn't I think of that?! Owner/ keeper combo. What could possibly gan wrang? We might even escape from D1 via several victories
Click to expand...
The size of Stallone these days he wouldn't have to move to block the goal :lol: Gotta be minted because of all the Rocky films he owns the rights to, as well as all the other films. :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top