Steak Pie
Striker
On this we agree. This all seems to be a further move to take as much of the nuance and variations out of the game as possible, to maximumise the camera time for the cheerleaders.
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
100 ball cricket!!!!
- Thread starter Mrjardine
- Start date
- Status
On this we agree. This all seems to be a further move to take as much of the nuance and variations out of the game as possible, to maximumise the camera time for the cheerleaders.
Twisted
Striker
This is the new breed of fan ftecb are desperate to get in? Count me out
Voice of fair play
Striker
Well yeah that is something I have always agreed with tbh.
The focus should be solely on what’s going on, on the field
My point has always been that the actual cricket on show is very good to watch and it is nothing new that people want to watch big shots as I believe that has always been the case.
Even in local club cricket well before T20,local people came to watch more when the overseas professional was playing,and that was not to see him beat the bat while bowling it was to watch big shots,and I also think a lot of fans prefer the game been more in favour of the batsman.
However like I say I fully agree this new idea is going to far in that favour.
S
stephen cartwright
Guest
Those 8 county grounds being used, will get the pick of the other tens best players and whilst those players are performing for the franchises, I think it's very naive to think that one or two, will not be tempted to sign on for the teams who play at these 8 select grounds
We've seen it already with Jennings, onions, borthwick, stoneman and coughlin going to the club's where these franchises are to be based.
Imo, it will lead clearly to these eight creating a monopoly of talent.
Just want to add, I'm all in favour of cricket in any form, but I'm totally against this rush to only eight grounds in the country, having it
All in or none in, is my view
Twisted
Striker
I have to agree. Whilst I'm not a fan of this 100 ball idea, I dont see hoe it makes things simpler if anything seems more a faff with 15 overs and a random 10 balls, but that doesn't bother us like the unnecessaryness of having a separate competition with new teams instead of just using the existing structure and teams.
How does ostracising existing teams and fans help generate goodwill and new fans?
Dougal
Striker
The lunatics have taken over the asylum just about sums it up, but there's some class comments in there
TwasOnTheFifthOfMay
Striker
Well because bowlers need to get off their fat arses, apart from Anderson and Broad, and learn how to f***ing bowl, rather that the pitch doing the work.
Simples.
The cheerleaders? The sooner we get the barmies out of the game the better.
Last edited:
Twisted
Striker
just a thought here but with this random 10 ball over, duckworth lewis calculations will become even more farcical won't they?
Last edited:
J
jackpunch
Guest
Telegraph stating 3 bowlers for the 10 ball over. What a f***ing farce
Twisted
Striker
how the fuck does that even make sense? surely two 5 ballers would be simpler if this is the case.
honestly how they think it simplifies things to have some overs being longer than other is beyond us. at least if every over is 6 balls it is consistent.
doesn't seem too confusing for the ipl and big bash which ftecb are so desperately scrabling to copy.
this is a shambolic embarrassment from start to finish like
J
jackpunch
Guest
how the fuck does that even make sense? surely two 5 ballers would be simpler if this is the case.
honestly how they think it simplifies things to have some overs being longer than other is beyond us. at least if every over is 6 balls it is consistent.
doesn't seem too confusing for the ipl and big bash which ftecb are so desperately scrabling to copy.
this is a shambolic embarrassment from start to finish like
Fuck knows. Hopefully someone will see sense and scrap the whole idea.
Steak Pie
Striker
how the fuck does that even make sense? surely two 5 ballers would be simpler if this is the case.
honestly how they think it simplifies things to have some overs being longer than other is beyond us. at least if every over is 6 balls it is consistent.
doesn't seem too confusing for the ipl and big bash which ftecb are so desperately scrabling to copy.
this is a shambolic embarrassment from start to finish like
Having given this a couple of seconds of thought.....
If they are going to do 100 balls then just do away with overs and let 5 bowlers do 20 balls each, and let them bowl through or stop at any point. Would add another element of tactics to the game, seeing as we couldn't give a shit about the sanctity of the game anymore.
So there you go, I gave that exactly 5 seconds of thought and came up with something better than the ECB.
Liverpool Beachball
Striker
This becoming more of a joke by the day, can’t see it being anything over than a huge failure
S
stephen cartwright
Guest
As has been said, dls will be nigh on impossible for the pros to work out, never mind the mythical new fans
Twisted
Striker
Dougal
Striker
I don't think FTECB remembered that they'd need to include provision of rules for the game. They were too busy counting their coins in their counting house!
just a thought here but with this random 10 ball over, duckworth lewis calculations will become even more farcical won't they?
Not saying I want it, I don't, but is it only me who sees some logic in it?
Countdown from 100 balls makes sense for those non cricket followers. People are saying it will be confusing with the 10 ball over etc, but essentially it doesn't matter if the main theme is counting down from 10
I get the logic in it
I just don't see the need, we have a good 20/20 tournament that just needs pushing and backing
Countdown from 100 balls makes sense for those non cricket followers. People are saying it will be confusing with the 10 ball over etc, but essentially it doesn't matter if the main theme is counting down from 10
I get the logic in it
I just don't see the need, we have a good 20/20 tournament that just needs pushing and backing
A
Ageing trundler
Guest
Club cricketers knew all about T20 before the counties started playing it and could identify with the format. This new idea has been dreamt up from cloud cuckoo land and doesn't resemble anything we know.
Twisted
Striker
The new fans will be real though.
There's a group of people on here that think that cos T20 crowds have recently increased from two men and a dog to three men and a dog it's a booming tournament, when it isn't.
I think this is a horrible bastardisation of cricket but equally I think that the 'new ECB' will market it well and generate a lot of interest in the game.
- Status
