D
Deleted member 40035
Guest
With quantum physics making a break through and leading scientists suggesting atoms are quite empty @ProfessionalMackem have you got any spare free tin foil hats marra?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
is your perception of the world really true...... always a sign of a genious.I'd recommend starting with
Your stupid. I like that.I don't believe you posted this or that you actually exist.
is your perception of the world really true...... always a sign of a genious.
Aliens are really here on earth you only need to do a bit research to see the truth.No idea mate, it isn't something that concerns me. I tend to follow Hume and shape my personal beliefs according to what I consider to be evidence. For better or worse I lack the conviction you tend to show when posting your conspiracy theories.
Aliens are really here on earth you only need to do a bit research to see the truth.
is your perception of the world really true...... always a sign of a genious.
Your stupid. I like that.
What do you make of Peter Power saying it was a drill?I'll pass on that if you don't mind, I watched the "Ripple Effect" nonsense you posted yesterday.
What do you mean by that mod?You're, doh.
Nevermind about that but it did get my attention but the Aliens are defo here like.I'll pass on that if you don't mind, I watched the "Ripple Effect" nonsense you posted yesterday.
What do you mean by that mod?
Nice one marraStill digging, I like that.
suggesting atoms are quite empty
Actually, that's wrong. Sorry to burst the bubble. It's a lazy description of what an atom is. It's not your fault. I see/hear Physicists give this description all the time on pop-sci TV shows and in books and it's 100% bullshit. It's laziness.It's been known for a long time that atoms are mostly empty space
I was more saying that to point out that it's not some recent breakthrough by top scientists. Electron positions are more a description of probability than an actual physical location around a nucleus. It's weird, and confusing, and I love it.Actually, that's wrong. Sorry to burst the bubble. It's a lazy description of what an atom is. It's not your fault. I see/hear Physicists give this description all the time on pop-sci TV shows and in books and it's 100% bullshit. It's laziness.
The electrons inside an atom exist as a probability distribution, basically a cloud. The entire atom is full of energy. The Bohr idea of an atom looks like this..
Logon or register to see this image
But that's wrong, an atom actually looks more like this...
It actually looks like neither, but the latter is closer to the truth. It's literally impossible to describe or understand Quantum Physics without knowing abstract mathematics. But anyway, no part of an atom is empty.
As for OP's original question...
Right now what do you see? The screen, right? Nope. You're actually looking at the back of your eyeball. The light hitting your eye is both colourless and invisible, like sound (bad analogy but I'll carry on..). The brain collects the various wavelenghts of light, then creates an image based on the electrical impulses recieved. Your brain is what creates the colour you're seeing right now.
So what we see, by definition, is not real.
I was more saying that to point out that it's not some recent breakthrough by top scientists. Electron positions are more a description of probability than an actual physical location around a nucleus. It's weird, and confusing, and I love it.
You tend to find that anyone who acts like they have a total grasp of quantum mechanics is talking bollocks
Logon or register to see this image
Plus even leaving aside the visual mechanics it's a past event by the time it is perceived and relies on appraisal coloured by old experience and huge gap bridging by the brain to create an experiental narrative.Actually, that's wrong. Sorry to burst the bubble. It's a lazy description of what an atom is. It's not your fault. I see/hear Physicists give this description all the time on pop-sci TV shows and in books and it's 100% bullshit. It's laziness.
The electrons inside an atom exist as a probability distribution, basically a cloud. The entire atom is full of energy. The Bohr idea of an atom looks like this..
Logon or register to see this image
But that's wrong, an atom actually looks more like this...
Logon or register to see this image
It actually looks like neither, but the latter is closer to the truth. It's literally impossible to describe or understand Quantum Physics without knowing abstract mathematics. But anyway, no part of an atom is empty.
As for OP's original question...
Right now what do you see? The screen, right? Nope. You're actually looking at the back of your eyeball. The light hitting your eye is both colourless and invisible, like sound (bad analogy but I'll carry on..). The brain collects the various wavelenghts of light, then creates an image based on the electrical impulses recieved. Your brain is what creates the colour you're seeing right now.
So what we see, by definition, is not real.
Poetic.Plus even leaving aside the visual mechanics it's a past event by the time it is perceived and relies on appraisal coloured by old experience and huge gap bridging by the brain to create an experiental narrative.
If you can know the true complete experience of one breath from impulse, to its arising, it's complete abiding and passing away, you will become enlightened. You never will, try it, your mind will interrupt.
How can there be truth when contact is run through such an unpredictable monitor.
With quantum physics making a break through and leading scientists suggesting atoms are quite empty @ProfessionalMackem have you got any spare free tin foil hats marra?