Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This.if benetiz had kept you up every mag and his dog would be saying only reason we stayed up was because of Rafa, in the end the only reason you went down was because rafa couldnt turn it around, you cant have it both wsys
Did he keep you up?
So he took you down then
Guess that's a yes then.
The answer is no. But you know, context...
So he took you down then
Guess that's a yes then.
The answer is no. But you know, context...
Well so many seem in denial that he played any part in it, so I was just wanting to see if you're as equally deluded and blinded.Ultimately, yes. Did you not already know this or did you just want me to say 'we were relegated under Rafael Benitez'? It's pretty obvious like.
Well so many seem in denial that he played any part in it, so I was just wanting to see if you're as equally deluded and blinded.
Evidently not
Played for a draw at Villa![]()
Well, stop being a lazy Fish and just turn off predictive text/auto-spell.That is accurate. Because the world is complicated and many factors affect eventual outcomes.
It's those rare typos that the auto-spell checks miss. Like "I nit" instead of "in it"or "withe" instead of "with the". It's a war of attrition I can't see me winning.
There's no doubt they had an upturn in results under him but four things are fundamentally true:Played for a draw at Villa![]()
I don't think I've seen anyone suggest that tbf, got a link?
It would be foolish to he's either 0% or 100% to blame for our relegation.
Tell me about this 'played for a draw at Villa'. I don't think it's ever been discussed or covered on here.
There's no doubt they had an upturn in results under him but four things are fundamentally true:
1. Anyone would do better than Tufty. Even John Carver.
2. They failed to beat Norwich, Villa or us, which is what sent them down.
3. He had enough time to do it, as illustrated by Di Canio and Advocaat.
4. Their results probably would've been sufficient in any other year but we had a storming finish under Allardyce.
I agree. It's still funny as fuck thoughThis one isn't mentioned enough tbf, your form under Allardyce at the back end of last season was mental. As such, there was such a clamour for him to stay on the back of it and there was talk of being at least a mid-table side before he left.
By lambasting Benitez for being relegated is taking some shine off Allardyce's achievements. Context.
You're more obsessed than me.This 118 page thread about Newcastle on a Sunderland forum? Some of our fellow fans are obsessed as fuck and I think you might be one of them
Aye I know 'its mostly mags posting in the thread'
Edit: 119 page thread
I don't think I've seen anyone suggest that tbf, got a link?
It would be foolish to he's either 0% or 100% to blame for our relegation.
Tell me about this 'played for a draw at Villa'. I don't think it's ever been discussed or covered on here.
Benitez went to the worst team in the league who had lost about 87 games in a row and set yous up to get a draw.
It cannot be expunged from the record I'm afraid, it is also relevant to the discussion.Oh, that game. No one has mentioned that game before.
Some sense here, eventually. In an otherwise absolute shambles of a thread.There's no doubt they had an upturn in results under him but four things are fundamentally true:
1. Anyone would do better than Tufty. Even John Carver.
2. They failed to beat Norwich, Villa or us, which is what sent them down.
3. He had enough time to do it, as illustrated by Di Canio and Advocaat.
4. Their results probably would've been sufficient in any other year but we had a storming finish under Allardyce.
Fuck off and contract aids, you obsessed obese cunt
That enough of a bite for you?