• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Benitez Future In Doubt Over Failure to Secure Key Signings

Status
Not open for further replies.

geordiedean said:
This whole pre Keegan thing is an absolute joke of an argument really. There are fans now who if born in 1988 and went to their first game in 93 say are now nearly 30 years old are you saying all of them are not as equal a fan or of right mind a fan as someone like me in their 40s

How about the generation of man United fans who from 90 onwards were used to them winning everything in sight are any different

Or are Older Liverpool fans different to newer ones because they were bandwagon jumpers in 70s and 80s yet newer ones aren't

People can't help their date of birth pal
Click to expand...

It's not the age of fans.

A load of blokes who were in their 20's and 30's jumped on the keegan/sky bandwagon. I lived in Scotland at the time and a load of jocks jumped on it also. Most of your armchair fans still believe its that same era.
 
raba said:
Loftus-Cheek has just said he chose Palace over Newcastle. Rafa's struggling to attract talent it seems.
Click to expand...

raba said:
Loftus-Cheek has just said he chose Palace over Newcastle. Rafa's struggling to attract talent it seems.
Click to expand...

The mags simply can't compete with Palace and alikes these days, loftus-cheek now, previously Andros Townsend dumped them for palace. Prior to that Pardew pursuaded Carr to sign Wickham but Ashley would only let them offer £6m, he stayed at Sunderland and eventually Palace offered the going rate. They are in the lower quartile in the premier league when it comes to competing for points or for players. Some of their fans have difficulty accepting this reality.
 
monty79 said:
It's not the age of fans.

A load of blokes who were in their 20's and 30's jumped on the keegan/sky bandwagon. I lived in Scotland at the time and a load of jocks jumped on it also. Most of your armchair fans still believe its that same era.
Click to expand...

You always refer to it as the 92ers though. Of course you're going to get bandwaggon jumpers no matter who you are just look at Chelsea,Man City and even Leicester f***ing ridiculous people posting foxes never die shit on FB. It's the same in any sports even more so here in the US which f***ing infuriates me to no end.

You yourselves have bandwaggon jumpers who will only go when in premier league against certain opposition

You use it as some kind of bait or stick to beat us with and it's utter nonsense because thanks to SKY it happens everywhere now

garyswc said:
The mags simply can't compete with Palace and alikes these days, loftus-cheek now, previously Andros Townsend dumped them for palace. Prior to that Pardew pursuaded Carr to sign Wickham but Ashley would only let them offer £6m, he stayed at Sunderland and eventually Palace offered the going rate. They are in the lower quartile in the premier league when it comes to competing for points or for players. Some of their fans have difficulty accepting this reality.
Click to expand...

It's simply down to the pathetic model and frugal way the owner runs things and also the complete incompetence of having a secretary as your CEO

The amount the club generates and I don't care what people say on here we are still in the top 30 in Europe of richest clubs. If we had any business boys and competent visionaries running the club we could compete
 
Last edited:
geordiedean said:
You always refer to it as the 92ers though. Of course you're going to get bandwaggon jumpers no matter who you are just look at Chelsea,Man City and even Leicester f***ing ridiculous people posting foxes never die shit on FB. It's the same in any sports even more so here in the US which f***ing infuriates me to no end.

You yourselves have bandwaggon jumpers who will only go when in premier league against certain opposition

You use it as some kind of bait or stick to beat us with and it's utter nonsense because thanks to SKY it happens everywhere now



It's simply down to the pathetic model and frugal way the owner runs things and also the complete incompetence of having a secretary as your CEO

The amount the club generates and I don't care what people say on here we are still in the top 30 in Europe of richest clubs. If we had any business boys and competent visionaries running the club we could compete
Click to expand...

Of course it happens to other clubs. But you can't deny you have a large fanbase of deluded fans that still call their pets "Keegan"
 
monty79 said:
Of course it happens to other clubs. But you can't deny you have a large fanbase of deluded fans that still call their pets "Keegan"
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say it was large but I'd say whoever did do that is an idiot. I've never come across anyone that has a kid or pet named Keegan nor would I entertain doing it myself. Bobby would be a better one :lol::lol:
 
geordiedean said:
You always refer to it as the 92ers though. Of course you're going to get bandwaggon jumpers no matter who you are just look at Chelsea,Man City and even Leicester f***ing ridiculous people posting foxes never die shit on FB. It's the same in any sports even more so here in the US which f***ing infuriates me to no end.

You yourselves have bandwaggon jumpers who will only go when in premier league against certain opposition

You use it as some kind of bait or stick to beat us with and it's utter nonsense because thanks to SKY it happens everywhere now



It's simply down to the pathetic model and frugal way the owner runs things and also the complete incompetence of having a secretary as your CEO

The amount the club generates and I don't care what people say on here we are still in the top 30 in Europe of richest clubs. If we had any business boys and competent visionaries running the club we could compete
Click to expand...

I agree fully with what you said in an earlier post. City, Chelsea, Man Utd, Arsenal and now Spurs and Liverpool are light years away from the rest. A lot of other clubs could compete given the right set of circumstances but the money needed to catch up with the top 6 now is just way too much.
 
geordiedean said:
You always refer to it as the 92ers though. Of course you're going to get bandwaggon jumpers no matter who you are just look at Chelsea,Man City and even Leicester f***ing ridiculous people posting foxes never die shit on FB. It's the same in any sports even more so here in the US which f***ing infuriates me to no end.

You yourselves have bandwaggon jumpers who will only go when in premier league against certain opposition

You use it as some kind of bait or stick to beat us with and it's utter nonsense because thanks to SKY it happens everywhere now



It's simply down to the pathetic model and frugal way the owner runs things and also the complete incompetence of having a secretary as your CEO

The amount the club generates and I don't care what people say on here we are still in the top 30 in Europe of richest clubs. If we had any business boys and competent visionaries running the club we could compete
Click to expand...

You are in the top 30 richest clubs by having 5 to 10m more than other premier league teams it means nothing.

Players are choosing palace because they are in London and a better team. Players are seeing you as a club likely to go down
 
The Situation said:
Future "in serious doubt" according to Martin Hardy, who recently wrote a book about Benitez, in today's Independent:

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Not a chance in hell man. 5m a year fhs. He'll end up getting a few in albeit 9th 10 th 11th choices.
 
beaches not breaches said:
Maybe, just maybe its because he's Dutch and possibly grew up watching De Boer, I mean its a massive Trump like leap into fake news but I think maybe this has some legs.
Palace fans on here mind, fuckin' ell, what next eh?
Click to expand...
I thought everyone wanted to play for Rafa though? Riedwald & Loftus-Cheek obviously disagree. Plus all the other players who have turned Newcastle down.
 
garyswc said:
The mags simply can't compete with Palace and alikes these days, loftus-cheek now, previously Andros Townsend dumped them for palace. Prior to that Pardew pursuaded Carr to sign Wickham but Ashley would only let them offer £6m, he stayed at Sunderland and eventually Palace offered the going rate. They are in the lower quartile in the premier league when it comes to competing for points or for players. Some of their fans have difficulty accepting this reality.
Click to expand...

Errrrr we can't compete with Fookin bankrupt Villa, Wolves and half the Fookin pub league

raba said:
I thought everyone wanted to play for Rafa though? Riedwald & Loftus-Cheek obviously disagree. Plus all the other players who have turned Newcastle down.
Click to expand...

You're still a shoite team in Croydon man

geordiedean said:
I'm under no illusions and said previously in this thread that withoit 4 to 5 quality additions we will struggle to stay up
Click to expand...

That just for ya defence?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top