Katie Hopkins

Status
Not open for further replies.


I haven't trawled through all of this thread, is there any substance or is it all just virtue signalling?

I think there's plenty of substance in calling her a spiteful cunt, like.

Don't know if you can call it "virtue signalling" exactly, as those that partake in such would probably object to me calling a woman a cunt.
 
I've worked with charities set up to collect hate crimes. Her publications most definitely fit the bill in terms of what the police recognise as.

Well go and work with real people instead of minorities and find out what the real view of the British people is.
 
She is extremely good at what she does. If people are daft enough to get hoity toity about it then that's what she takes advantage of.
This

The amount of advertising revenue she must bring in is outrageous.

Hideous human being.
And this

Katie Hopkins seeks to use a terrorist attack to deliberately offend people with inflammatory remarks, what a surprise.
Also this

She's just an attention seeking old witch.
Along with this

making a fortune out of people getting outraged over her comments. she must laugh all the way to the bank.
Plus this

It's more often than not the case that when people 'tell it like it is', they are talking absolute shit.

Such statements are normally concluded with 'just saying...'
Or prefixed with " I'm not being funny"

I think she's canny, wad!
You definitely need to visit the vet. Statements like that have convinced me that you and your fuzzy little swingers need to part company.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well go and work with real people instead of minorities and find out what the real view of the British people is.

Those minorities are British people and plenty of what you would describe as proper Brits are reporting these hate crimes too.

Point still stands, this knackers slurs and rants fit the hate crime bill.
 
She is extremely good at what she does. If people are daft enough to get hoity toity about it then that's what she takes advantage of.

Extremely good at what?
Addressing issues in a completely black and white manner with zero nuance or middle ground? Confirming a pre exhististing agenda with no investigation and lies if need be? Being simplistic, inflammatory and popularist on complicated issues?

Virtually anyone could do what she does. Half the idiots on here could if only they hadn't learnt to spell using a Nokia
 
Extremely good at what?
Addressing issues in a completely black and white manner with zero nuance or middle ground? Confirming a pre exhististing agenda with no investigation and lies if need be? Being simplistic, inflammatory and popularist on complicated issues?

Virtually anyone could do what she does. Half the idiots on here could if only they hadn't learnt to spell using a Nokia

It's rubbish to suggest anybody could do it. Well, anywhere near as well as Hopkins does it. There's a reason she's talked about and reposted and clicked through to more than any other.
 
It's rubbish to suggest anybody could do it. Well, anywhere near as well as Hopkins does it. There's a reason she's talked about and reposted and clicked through to more than any other.

There's a reason as she has marketed herself very well as public enemy no1. I'll give her that. But There's no skill in how or what she writes about. It's simple answers to complicated questions confirming pre existing opinions held by dullards
 
There's a reason as she has marketed herself very well as public enemy no1. I'll give her that. But There's no skill in how or what she writes about. It's simple answers to complicated questions confirming pre existing opinions held by dullards

There's skill in how she does it. Of course there is otherwise she wouldn't have such notoriety.
 
There's a reason as she has marketed herself very well as public enemy no1. I'll give her that. But There's no skill in how or what she writes about. It's simple answers to complicated questions confirming pre existing opinions held by dullards

This. Saying nothing different to the John's Smiths of this world. Difference is she has a public platform (f***ing a married man in a field helped with building that in the same Kimmy Fat Arses sex tape helped her).
 
She's basically a more media-friendly version of Tommy Robinson. Horrible individual but plays the part to perfection and the fact that people click on her columns and there are threads about her on the likes of here mean she's going to have the longevity she does not deserve.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top