The Other Durham
Striker
He'll be good in the Championship.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
manquillo is better based on what? his handfull of games at liverpool or his few appearances at madrid. what was the point in signing love?The point is if he wanted Yedlin he could have him. He doesn't. There's clearly a reason for that which anyone can see that he has someone else lined up who he thinks is better. If we get Manquilo he is far better player than Yedlin.
It wasn't really. I bet there aren't many teams play with three defensive midfielders to cover for how poor the full backs are.
Yeldin was really poor when he came here. Not much different from Love.That's a different question though mate.
Just because Love is a young 'n and looks poor so far doesn't make Yedlin a good player does it?
He was bang average. This Spanish kid sounds very promising though.
Yedlin is good enough for the lower league vermin up the road but that doesn't mean he's good enough for us.
ill put it another way then the back 4 we had last season is miles better than the back 4 we had against boroIt wasn't really. I bet there aren't many teams play with three defensive midfielders to cover for how poor the full backs are.
PVA and Yedlin should have been back up players no more. The pair of them have a lot to learn before they should be considered shoe ins at any premier league club and as you rightly point out we had to use a couple of midfielders to cover for them. Actually noticed on Saturday Papy made two tackles over the half way line.It wasn't really. I bet there aren't many teams play with three defensive midfielders to cover for how poor the full backs are.
Signing Love has no bearing on signing Yedlin. I'm not sure why you keep mentioning it.manquillo is better based on what? his handfull of games at liverpool or his few appearances at madrid. what was the point in signing love?
If you have nightmares over Love then i suggest you get out moreIf we'd signed someone better I'd agree, unfortunately the one we have signed is the stuff of nightmares.
So?ill put it another way then the back 4 we had last season is miles better than the back 4 we had against boro
Aye agreed.Yeldin was really poor when he came here. Not much different from Love.
Was he not part of the excellent run of 11 unbeaten. With BSA he was more than decent like. Just because we didn't value him at 5m doesn't mean he was shit. I would have preferred us to spend that on him instead of Love and McNair
so pva and yedlin not good enough for sunderland, every player has alot to learn but some have nothing to work with both them have alot to offer and both can improvePVA and Yedlin should have been back up players no more. The pair of them have a lot to learn before they should be considered shoe ins at any premier league club and as you rightly point out we had to use a couple of midfielders to cover for them. Actually noticed on Saturday Papy made two tackles over the half way line.
Signing Love has no bearing on signing Yedlin. I'm not sure why you keep mentioning it.
Nah he wasn't ever really better than decent other than maybe Southampton away. He had a few decent games, very similar to when people on here were happy when we signed Coates after he had a few good games and we stayed up. He isn't good enough. Allardyce evidently didn't want him and now Moyes doesn't.
It wasn't really. I bet there aren't many teams play with three defensive midfielders to cover for how poor the full backs are.
because hes better than what we have any signing that is better than what we have will improve the team. how is manquillo better than yedlin?So?
Why does that mean we should sign Yedlin just because he is available?
So why have we been trying all summer?
Wouldn't pay the 5m. I don't see how McNair is worth that but not Yedlin like.