Dunno but he's just been on the local news" got a really bad comb over ! I shall be seeing Julie tonight at a social event.....will pass on your messages.Which one?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dunno but he's just been on the local news" got a really bad comb over ! I shall be seeing Julie tonight at a social event.....will pass on your messages.Which one?
Aye, so not in sync.No, they are in sync. It's not really measuring the competence of the minor, it's the competence of the adult.
Imagine you place all under 16 inside the 'line' and all adults outside it (as the law does) - we know that there might be some 15's mature about to be outside it, and some 16's who are immature enough to be inside it, but the law isn't really trying to stop minors stepping outside, it's to stop predators stepping inside. The law assumes a responsible adult knows never to step inside that line, regardless of how mature the minor is.
It's no different that the speed limit in that respect. Of course some roads aren't designated correctly and that the numbers are some arbitrary value that differs from country to country - but if you can't stick to the rules, you know there's a potential consequence.
I 100 percent agree. The police wife looks awkward as owt on the telly as well. The arseholes want him to get 10 yr when people do things 5x worse and get less than half that. It's ridiculous really tbh
We can't just react because the press are wanting heads to roll, man. Where would that end?
Anything that's curved and slippery when wet is dangerous!Aye, so not in sync.
While that's true to a point, its the press, politicians, supporters, friends and family of the victim and sponsors. Cant sweep that under the rug.We can't just react because the press are wanting heads to roll, man. Where would that end?
Agree. Although I think the club as an entity has the stink of a corpse about it.
True. They can't sack enough of them for me, but it still wouldn't fix the negativity which will, inevitably, dog us going forward.While that's true to a point, its the press, politicians, supporters, friends and family of the victim and sponsors. Cant sweep that under the rug.
I can't argue with that.I think we are a superb mob, probably the most down to earth and accepting group of fans around.
Because of our gaffers we have allowed ourselves to become what we should never have been, and are now being bitten on the arse for it, there is a shitstorm coming imo.
While that's true to a point, its the press, politicians, supporters, friends and family of the victim and sponsors. Cant sweep that under the rug.
Thing is as fans do we really want silence? Or do we want conclusive proof that our club didn't harbour someone that they could have possibly suspected would go down for this?7 day wonder just ignore they will move on, silence is the best answer.
I have few facts to support this but, let's face it, that doesn't seem to be a requisite for some people on here.
It's starting to appear as if the police initially went to the club in an attempt to pressurise them into hanging Johnson out to dry.
They seem to have divulged much more information than I believe in usual, or are now claiming to have done.
We're they hoping the club would sack him and leave him isolated? That would certainly have made their job easier and removed doubt in the minds of the public and possibly jury. I can't understand why the police are so keen to go to the BBC and, almost exclusively, talk about what the club knew.
Why aren't they, as they usually do, talking about the convicted person, the conviction and how it was achieved?
There's something that just doesn't smell right.
This is thread is like the Alzheimer's Society AGM, now where were we again?
We got away with the Ji case, because it was a different misdemeanour, and the FA were as much at fault as us. It also wasn't her who forgot to send the extra bit of paper.So, she's basically in charge of the club as Ellis lives on a different continent.
How many fuck ups have happened during her watch?
Ji playing while not being signed (got away with that when others have been docked points in the past)
Not realising we'd signed a contract to sign Alverez then f***ing up and being left £7 million out of pocket with no player to show for it.
The way she handled the Johnson case
These are just off the top of my head.
Maggie or any of your representatives, if you're reading this, you're useless, you haven't got a clue how to do your job, get the resignation in you arsehole and then please fuck off.
Bring back David Miliband
I don't think so, but she's a girlSo has Maggie Byrne resigned then? - I mean that is what all this is about isn't it?
We didn't get away with the Ji case, we got fined. We've also been fined and warned over using dodgy agents.We got away with the Ji case, because it was a different misdemeanour, and the FA were as much at fault as us. It also wasn't her who forgot to send the extra bit of paper.
The Alvares case is not final yet, though he has been declared a free agent from both warring clubs. As yet we still owe nothing on that one until a judgement is reached, but don't let that get in the way of you're rant.
It's not quite gin o'clock for me yetthis thread will get interesting when the friday night pisspots get lubricated later