Billy Batts
Striker
It is for us.I want us to do well.
We're in the Premier League, we should be spending money.
I'm happy to give Defoe a chance, but it's hardly a King's ransom in PL terms.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is for us.I want us to do well.
We're in the Premier League, we should be spending money.
I'm happy to give Defoe a chance, but it's hardly a King's ransom in PL terms.
It's what you have to do to get players like him, he's what 32 say he's still got it is it unfair to say he will still over something in two years time?, players like Philips shearing ham crouch all offered something at the sort of age Defoe would be near the end of the deal.I wouldn't be happy if we signed Robbie Keane.
Would you?
I made the point earlier that Defoe is a Keane-esque signing, only with marginally deeper pockets. Hence reference to Yorke - a player that achieve success as a stopgap, but was also part of one of our biggest issues in recent years, being saddled with expensive dead wood.
My biggest issue with the reported contract isn't the salary, but the duration. Why would we want Defoe in 3 years time?
Looks at the comparison if you really need to. Bloody hell man.
It's what you have to do to get players like him, he's what 32 say he's still got it is it unfair to say he will still over something in two years time?, players like Philips shearing ham crouch all offered something at the sort of age Defoe would be near the end of the deal.
3.5 years for a 32 year old with a history of injury niggles and whose game relies on bursts of pace?
Embarrassing business by the club.
lol
What history?. Hasn't he played over 500 games for club and country?.3.5 years for a 32 year old with a history of injury niggles and whose game relies on bursts of pace?
Embarrassing business by the club.
lol
It isn't a bad thing mate, it's a no brainer. Dunno what some people's problem with it is tbh.Of course mate. Wasn't wanting an argument, just replying to your opinion. A difference of 30k a week, getting shot of altidore and replacing him with Defoe, just can't be a bad thing.
Hope the cold weather doesn't put him off.defoe is in sunderland to sign a deal
9-12 more than the useless plank we are swapping him for then
Dennis told ya didn't he?defoe is in sunderland to sign a deal
3.5 years for a 32 year old with a history of injury niggles and whose game relies on bursts of pace?
Embarrassing business by the club.
lol
My biggest issue with the reported contract isn't the salary, but the duration. Why would we want Defoe in 3 years time?
Why? He's 32 not 40, if he still has it now he will have it next season.He's a better option than Altidore, but that's hardly the point.
Neither player has a significant value on the open market really, albeit for very different reasons.
The question we should be asking is "is he the answer to our goalscoring issues", because that's why he was signed. I'd suggest that he might be til the end of this season, and definitely isn't beyond that.
He's a better option than Altidore, but that's hardly the point.
Neither player has a significant value on the open market really, albeit for very different reasons.
The question we should be asking is "is he the answer to our goalscoring issues", because that's why he was signed. I'd suggest that he might be til the end of this season, and definitely isn't beyond that.
defoe is in sunderland to sign a deal
Why? He's 32 not 40, if he still has it now he will have it next season.